http://www.pacia.org.au/_uploaditems/docs/3.mercury.pdf


--- In alchemy2@yahoogroups.com, "Eduardo Esteves" <edueste@...> wrote:
>
> You are not understanding me. May be itīs my poor english.
> I mentioned the symbols because of your terms that seemed out of the
> traditional meanings.
> About the bits: Any text is composed with bits.
> About the "dew to be water": Dew is not only water! And its use in
> alchemical works is just because of its different qualities in
rellation to
> water. We obtain condensed water from vapour.
> About "caught to the symbol": Itīs the first time I hear somebody
says that
> "a thousand words worth more than an image".
> You seem to be talking about another Alchemy instead that from the
group.
> Are you talking about inner alchemy(qigong) or spiritual alchemy?
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>