| |
Subject |
Author |
Date |
| 7102 |
RE: [altnetconf] ALT.NET Summit action items
... mentioned and discussed on this list just in the past few days. Phil Haack and others were discussing the MVC framework and the [ControllerAction] attribute. IMHO, and I think many others will agree, in many (but not all!!!) cases the use of attributes in a framework can be ... |
Charlie Poole
charlie@...
cpoole98370
|
Dec 11, 2007
4:38 am |
| 7037 |
Re: [altnetconf] [ControllerAction] attribute
... Wilson <dotnetguy@... wrote: DevDiv definitely has a "code defensively" mentality, and it shows in everything they do, not just [ControllerAction]. Have you noticed that "New Class" creates a class which is internal by default, not public? Why isn't anybody complaining about ... |
Ayende Rahien
Ayende@...
ayende123
|
Dec 11, 2007
1:53 am |
| 7035 |
Re: [altnetconf] [ControllerAction] attribute
... Wilson <dotnetguy@... wrote: DevDiv definitely has a "code defensively" mentality, and it shows in everything they do, not just [ControllerAction]. Have you noticed that "New Class" creates a class which is internal by default, not public? Why isn't anybody complaining about ... |
Josh Flanagan
joshuaflanagan@...
joshuaflanagan
|
Dec 11, 2007
1:52 am |
| 6965 |
Re: [altnetconf] [ControllerAction] attribute
... Wilson <dotnetguy@... wrote: DevDiv definitely has a "code defensively" mentality, and it shows in everything they do, not just [ControllerAction]. Have you noticed that "New Class" creates a class which is internal by default, not public? Why isn't anybody complaining about ... |
Kevin Miller
scoundrel@...
millerkj
|
Dec 10, 2007
8:56 pm |
| 6948 |
Re: [ControllerAction] attribute
... Wilson" <dotnetguy@...> wrote: DevDiv definitely has a "code defensively" mentality, and it shows in everything they do, not just [ControllerAction]. Have you noticed that "New Class" creates a class which is internal by default, not public? Why isn't anybody complaining about ... |
Peter Ritchie
yahoo.ritchiep1@...
peterritchie
|
Dec 10, 2007
6:40 pm |
| 6947 |
Re: [altnetconf] [ControllerAction] attribute
... around C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\Common7\IDE\ItemTemplates\CSharp\Code\1033 Re: the attribute... Dropping the controlleraction attribute would go against existing patterns, like WebMethod and ScriptMethod. I think the ControllerAction attribute fits nicely ... |
Sergio Pereira
sergioafp@...
tjokerbr
|
Dec 10, 2007
6:40 pm |
| 6946 |
Re: [altnetconf] [ControllerAction] attribute
This is also part of the framework guidelines, FWIW. I had a discussion with Gred about this at DevTeach, we agreed that about the only thing in the framework that should be internal is: *MethodImplOptions<http://www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet/Default.aspx ... |
Ayende Rahien
Ayende@...
ayende123
|
Dec 10, 2007
6:38 pm |
| 6945 |
Re: [altnetconf] [ControllerAction] attribute
On Dec 10, 2007 10:20 AM, Ayende Rahien <Ayende@... wrote: Brad, You don't read my blog, I see. Guilty. That code defensively approach is annoying. Won't get any arguments from me on that front. I wasn't justifying, just saying that they're at least ... |
Brad Wilson
dotnetguy@...
bradw_64
|
Dec 10, 2007
6:35 pm |
| 6943 |
Re: [altnetconf] [ControllerAction] attribute
... Wilson <dotnetguy@... wrote: DevDiv definitely has a "code defensively" mentality, and it shows in everything they do, not just [ControllerAction]. Have you noticed that "New Class" creates a class which is internal by default, not public? Why isn't anybody complaining about ... |
Ayende Rahien
Ayende@...
ayende123
|
Dec 10, 2007
6:20 pm |
| 6941 |
Re: [altnetconf] [ControllerAction] attribute
That thought was how the reasoning it was presented. On 12/10/07, Damien Guard <damien@... wrote: I originally thought this attribute was a good idea as it meant writing methods in the controller were not immediately exposed and therefore secure by ... |
Ayende Rahien
Ayende@...
ayende123
|
Dec 10, 2007
6:03 pm |
