Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
amastro · Amateur Astronomy Mailing List
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 21341 - 21370 of 22656   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
21341
Hi Kent, as Matthias already said I tried the galaxy last year with my 16" under very good alpine skies (SQM 21,6 with milky way). I could see the galaxy...
Uwe Glahn
uwe_glahn
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2008
8:29 am
21342
Dear Kent, I was unable to see the ring of Hoag's object, first around 1985 with a 14" and later with a 20" under good conditions. Has anyone tried the othe...
Wolfgang Steinicke
steinicke02
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2008
11:51 am
21343
Hi Uwe, You are right. Like Howard, you saw a disk not a ring. I guess seeing Hoag's object as a ring with a bright center is a challenge for the big scopes....
Kent Wallace
kwwallace@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2008
4:57 pm
21344
Hi Wolfgang, Thanks, for your negitve observations of the ring of Hoag's Object. I haven't tried your other Hoags but since I'm running out of PNe to observe I...
Kent Wallace
kwwallace@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2008
5:06 pm
21345
... I heard and it and was very interesting to see how an observatory program works. Even the professionals get tired. Ron...
astroron77
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2008
6:30 pm
21346
... It was nicely done. I enjoyed hearing the Rebecca Elson readings. Thomas...
nofs2003
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2008
2:35 am
21347
Answer is yes it would be easier if it were mag 6 rather than mag 3.5. While the Airy disk would be exactly the same size regardless of magnitude, (The Airy...
Zarenski, Edward R
edzaren
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2008
12:17 pm
21348
I've seen the core with a 10-inch. I've never seen the ring with anything. - Sue ... From: amastro@yahoogroups.com [mailto:amastro@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf...
Sue French
susancfrench
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2008
7:58 pm
21349
Hi Sue, That's a really good observation for a 10" scope since it wasn't easy in my 20" scope. Thanks, Kent ... From: Sue French To: amastro@yahoogroups.com ...
Kent Wallace
kwwallace@...
Send Email
Jun 3, 2008
12:35 am
21350
Last month three of us saw the ring of Hoag's in Jimi Lowrey's 48" at Fort Davis, Texas. Transparency was about 8 of 10, seeing was about 4 of 10. The bright...
Jim Chandler
jimcchandler
Offline Send Email
Jun 3, 2008
10:52 pm
21351
I'm sure no one would be more amused at the interest in this galaxy than Art Hoag. He used to be the director at Lowell (mid-1970s to mid-80s), though Hoag's...
Brian Skiff
bas@...
Send Email
Jun 3, 2008
11:35 pm
21352
Hi Jim, Thanks for your observation. It is nice to know that the ring can be seen, even if you have to use a 48" scope to see it. Good luck on observing the...
Kent Wallace
kwwallace@...
Send Email
Jun 4, 2008
2:58 am
21353
update on Hoag's Ring. We saw the ring in Jim Chandlers 30 inch last night here at TSP. My grandson Ben, myself, Faith Jorden from the UK, and others. Barbara...
Barbara Wilson
barbarawilson2
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2008
5:24 pm
21354
Hi Barbara, Thanks for the update on Hoag's Ring. I have a friend with a 30" scope. Maybe I can convience him to give it a try. Clear skies! Kent ... From:...
Kent Wallace
kwwallace@...
Send Email
Jun 6, 2008
8:16 pm
21355
For those of you that have a copy of the SECGPN, I just found out the possible PN 19W96 listed in Table 2 is the same object as Bl 3-4, listed as a rejected...
Kent Wallace
kwwallace@...
Send Email
Jun 10, 2008
4:29 pm
21356
There's a fellow on another astronomy forum who says he is able to see M51 and M101 naked-eye. I've heard anyone else ever make this claim. Neither object is...
davejm28
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
6:18 am
21357
The NED database shows the following total V magnitudes for three bright northern galaxies/pairs: M81 6.94 +/- 0.03 M101 7.86 +/- 0.10 NGC 5194...
Brian Skiff
bas@...
Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
7:14 am
21358
I would add to Brian's comments that claiming to have seen something does not automatically make it a fact...although some seem willing to consider it that way...
cnj999
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
3:26 pm
21359
John, et al; I agree that a wide variety of claims get made and few get refuted it seems. The Internet seems to propel these claims as if they were accepted....
Steve Coe
stevecoeaz2001
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
4:24 pm
21360
Most of us here have seen the limits of detectability pushed forward first hand. There was a time when nobody would believe that you could see the jet in M87,...
Greg Crinklaw
theskyhound
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
5:29 pm
21361
Greg; My point was that if an observer, myself included, is going to claim to see a faint or otherwise difficult object then they should have a confirmation to...
Steve Coe
stevecoeaz2001
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
6:30 pm
21362
Hi Steve, ... And it is a point well taken. I was making an entirely different point... Clear skies, Greg -- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer ...
Greg Crinklaw
theskyhound
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
6:36 pm
21363
Having confirmation from another experienced observer as Steve suggests is certainly a plus in assuring that the first observation was valid. But what if there...
Chuck Dethloff
chuck_dethloff
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
7:20 pm
21364
Steve, ... . but if this is all about eyesight and visual acuity (and I think it is), and knowing that only very few poeple are capable of detecting those very...
Sebastian Otero
varsao
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
7:22 pm
21365
http://tech.ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/amastro/photos/browse/4ba3 <http://tech.ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/amastro/photos/browse/4ba3> TSP 2008 had some of the...
Barbara Wilson
barbarawilson2
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
8:26 pm
21366
The use of non-optical observing aid would also help. A?cardboard tube and black cloth might make it possible to a keen eyed observer who knew where to look. ...
geoffcin@...
geodude_11801
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
8:37 pm
21367
Notwithstanding the "imagination nebula" (commonly seen on a late night at the Grand Canyon Star Party), my best naked-eye observation does include M33. I was...
George Barber
astro_george31
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
8:37 pm
21368
I once saw the "imagination nebula" in my telescope! "Steve Coe" <stevecoe@... rg> To Sent by:...
George Barber
astro_george31
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
8:37 pm
21369
... Indeed it was good, and we appreciate all the hard work you, Buster, Steve & Amelia, Dave & Valerie, Ann, John, Larry, Jim and all the other staff & ...
Len Philpot
lphilpot01
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
10:37 pm
21370
Barbara, That luck! Beautiful photo of the Milky Way on the group of observers and fantastic observation with the 49”, a luxury. Congratulations. Rodolfo. ...
Rodolfo Ferraiuolo
nocherito2006
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2008
11:00 pm
Messages 21341 - 21370 of 22656   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help