> > > I've never tried x86 code with vbcc, but it's supposed to
> > > have the x86 option. For that matter, I've never written any
> > > x86 assembler.
> > >
> > > I just checked Volker Barthelmann's web site and it says that
> > > vbcc "backends (with different degree of maturity) exist for
> > > the following architectures:" 680x0 (used by me), Coldfile,
> > > PowerPC (used by me), 80x86(386 and above), Alpha, C16x/ST10,
> > > 68hc12, z-machine. Host systems include Windows and
> > > Unix/Linux system.
> > >
> > > I was hoping there'd be an AmigaOS version that would compile
> > > x86, but I haven't found it yet.
> >
> > None of the GG tools ? :)
> >
> > I'm setting up an cross compiler setup.
> > Should do the trick I hope.
>
> Hiho,
>
> i have done this also and it was no problem to make full
> working binutils with that.
>
> But i run into problems while make of cross compiled gcc
> 2.95.3 because for that you need a static x86 glibc.
>
> So i downloaded glibc and found out that with my linux
> compiler setup i was not able to compile that stuff..
>
> Please let me know how far you get it working or not, maybe i
> can help you a bit and we can make at the end some howto readme for
> ppl who will do the same.
>
> Let us discuss this by email or on amithlondev mailing list
> so that we do not anoy others here with that technical gcc horror :)

Oki, here my idea.

Fully working stable cross compiling enviroment.

Here what I have so far:

1. Working Amithlon setup
(BX based mainboard, sound and NIC working)

2. Red hat box (www.clarkconnect.net)

I'm looking into Martins excelent page:

http://www.lysator.liu.se/~lcs/files/gg-cross/

(Seems down now?)

Before I begin..

[root@c /]# gcc --version
2.96

Is this level to high ?

Docs/readme states "2.95.3"

Please bear with me :)

--
Ulf