Hi Randolf, If you are going to claim you have done hours and hours of research, you might want to get your facts straight. Did you know that the SSTV came...
While I doubt that this is sufficient prrof for the most diehard of HBs, I can imagine that a few of them will be feeling a little foolish right now. The...
Even better when the higher resolution pictures arrive. You are right, the diehards will have problems with the truth even when it slaps them in the face. ...
I'm just sitting here, listening to the Apollo 11 real-time streaming from NASA. The last time I listened was on July 20, 1969. I was 9 at the time so it's all...
Regarding the lack of a blast crater, I read somewhere that NASA expected the dust on the moon surface to be quite deep, due to the fact that there is no wind...
... Certainly some scientists were suggesting that, but by the time of Apollo, several unmanned probes, both Russian and US, had already landed and shown the...
... All right then, how do you determine if ANY photo from any source is legit, if everyone's as capable of faking as anyone else? The point is not whether it...
Who exactly is this "they" you are talking about? The hundreds to thousands of people employed in and around NASA? You mean to tell me that NASA sent out a...
Who's telling everyone the deal was a fake? That wouldn't make any sense to tell everyone the real deal. It wouldn't be so hard to give the majorety of NASA...
The post I responded to gave me the impression that the new photos were eveidence that the moon landings were real. I'm saying that photos released by NASA...
They should simply emulate the very successful Apollo program and get there sooner. What, they want to travel more in style this time? Maybe they're afraid...
... thousands of people employed in and around NASA? You mean to tell me that NASA sent out a memo to all of them saying "we are gonna fake some photos so...
... Why not? They show objects sitting on the lunar surface right where there should be landers. Unless you can prove they are fraudulent, we have no basis to...
... EVen if you break it down to the bare minimumof people who had to know it was fake, that still leaves an impossibly large number who would have had to keep...
... No they shouldn't. They want to go back for *long periods*, spending months or more on the Moon at a time. The Apollo system just is not up to that task....
It's not just the hardware that shows up in these photos, it's details of the lunar landscape. Already on more specialist forums, people are looking at these...
Apollo was successful largely because of the amount of money that was spent. Today we are trying to enlarge that lost capability with a much smaller budget. At...
... I don't really need to tell people here that this was a fake, right? I have never been employed by NASA or any other organisation connected with the Moon...
The whole "the Russians would have exposed us" is the biggest crock I've ever heard. 1. This would be an act of war, which they did not want. It would...
... This must be one of the dumbest claims of the hoax proponents. Why would the Russians launch lunar and planetary probes from 1958 onwards if they couldn't...
Odd then that the USSR had no problem in blowing the cover on U2 flights over the Soviet Union in the 1960s. Regardless, your claim that the USSR could not...
So, now they got water (some form of it) on the moon surface! We walked on the moon 40 years ago, we brought back all the samples from moon surface and we...
... How predictable that this discovery should bring out all the HBs baying about the dryness of Apollo samples. No, we could not be certain. Water is...
... For instance, I have a copy of NASA EP-101 "On the Moon with Apollo 17" which I purchased in 1972. It was written before the Apollo 17 mission to describe...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
