Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

apollokauai · Apollo Kauai

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 44
  • Category: Energy
  • Founded: Nov 10, 2006
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 415 - 444 of 454   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#415 From: "vshewywsa" <vshewywsa@...>
Date: Tue Jul 8, 2008 8:46 am
Subject: Your profile has been added to my personal space!
vshewywsa
Send Email Send Email
 
Your profile has been added to my personal space! Check my space here:
http://cnrewfs.zoomshare.com/files/sugar2008.htm

#416 From: "Clark Dodge" <clark@...>
Date: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:41 pm
Subject: I wish all voters would understand this]
kauaipower
Send Email Send Email
 

Was watching this on TV and then read this.  This is the best write up yet, as it does not come from either side so maybe we can get some solar and wind power projects going.  I was reading some of my contact websites for kits to install solar hot water heating.  The kits cost about $1500 to $2500 depending on what you want.  They are easy to install, to bad they make you use certain contractors.

 

 

 

 

Now for the actual FACTS from a reputable news agency rather than a right-wing fat wallet blogger.
.
Middle-class families get tax cuts that are three times larger from Obama than from McCain, and the McCain plan gives nearly one-quarter of its benefits to households making more than $2.8 million annually - the top 0.1%.


What they'll do to your tax bill

McCain and Obama want to change the bottom-line effects of the tax code. Here's a dollars-and-cents breakdown of what their plans could mean for you.


BREAKING DOWN THE NUMBERS

Here's how the average tax bill could change in 2009 if either John McCain's or Barack Obama's tax proposals were fully in place.

 

MCCAIN

OBAMA

Income

Avg. tax bill change

Avg. tax bill change

 

THE RICH WIN

 

Over $2.9M

-$269,364  

+$701,885

$603K and up

-$45,361    

+$115,974

$227K-$603K

-$7,871

+$12

$161K-$227K

-$4,380

-$2,789

$112K-$161K

-$2,614

-$2,204    

 

 

MIDDLE CLASS WINS

$66K-$112K

-$1,009

-$1,290   

$38K-$66K

-$319

-$1,042  

$19K-$38K

-$113

-$892

Under $19K

-$19

-$567

Source:The Tax Policy Center

 

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- John McCain and Barack Obama have starkly different philosophies about tax policy - how to raise the revenue needed to support government programs, spur growth and ensure economic fairness.

But voters really want to know one thing: How would the presidential candidates' views trickle down to their tax bills? A report released Wednesday by a nonpartisan policy group in Washington, D.C., takes a big first step toward answering that question.

According to the Tax Policy Center's findings, the common assumptions most people make about the plans of McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, and Obama, the Democrats' pick, are not wildly off-base.

McCain: The average taxpayer in every income group would see a lower tax bill, but high-income taxpayers would benefit more than everyone else.

Obama: High-income taxpayers would pay more in taxes, while everyone else's tax bill would be reduced. Those who benefit the most - in terms of reducing their taxes as a percentage of after-tax income - are in the lowest income groups.

Under both plans, all American taxpayers could pay a price for their tax cuts: a bigger deficit. The Tax Policy Center estimates that over 10 years, McCain's tax proposals could increase the national debt by as much as $4.5 trillion with interest, while Obama's could add as much as $3.3 trillion.

The reason: neither plan would raise the amount of revenue expected under current tax policy - which assumes all the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts expire by 2011. And neither plan would raise enough to cover expected government costs during those 10 years.

"Distributionally, they're markedly different. But in terms of their impact on revenue, the two plans are not terribly different," said Roberton Williams, principal research associate at the Tax Policy Center and the former deputy assistant director for tax analysis at the Congressional Budget Office.

A closer look

In addition to making the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts permanent, McCain says he would double the exemption for dependents, lower the corporate tax rate, make expensing rules more generous for small businesses and lessen the bite of the estate tax and Alternative Minimum tax.

The net result: compared with their tax bill today, taxpayers on average would see their tax bill cut by nearly $1,200. That means their after-tax income would rise by 2%.

But those in the lowest income groups would only see their after-tax income rise by less than 1% (or between $19 and $319). By contrast, the highest-income households - those with incomes of at least $603,000 - would see a boost in after-tax income of 3.4%, or more than $40,000.

Obama's plan would keep the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts in place for everyone except those making more than roughly $250,000, and he would increase the capital gains tax.

Obama would also introduce new tax breaks for lower and middle-income groups. Such breaks include expanding the earned income tax credit, giving those making less than $150,000 a $500 tax credit per person on the first $8,100 in income, giving those making under $75,000 a 50% federal match on the first $1,000 of savings, and exempting seniors making less than $50,000 from having to pay income tax.

Like McCain, Obama would lessen the bite of the estate tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax, but to a lesser degree.

The net result: compared with their tax bill today, taxpayers on average would see their tax bill cut by nearly $160 under Obama's plan. That means their after-tax income would rise by 0.3%.

But those in the lowest-income groups would enjoy the biggest after-tax income rise as a percentage of income - between 2.4% and 5.5% (worth between $567 and $1,042). By contrast, the highest-income households - those with at least $603,000 in income - would see a dramatic decline in their after-tax income - a drop of 8.7%, or $116,000.

The campaigns respond

Jason Furman, a newly appointed senior economic adviser to Obama, said his preliminary response is that the report's findings bear out what Obama's campaign has been saying: that he's for the middle class.

 


#417 From: "matchduffriends" <matchduffriends@...>
Date: Wed Aug 6, 2008 5:47 am
Subject: I wanna get to know you!
matchduffriends
Send Email Send Email
 
You're really cute. I wanna get to know you. Here's my profile with many photos
Reach me here.
http://mhgjyrhd.topcities.com/photos.htm

#418 From: "gon2top2" <james.r.hall5@...>
Date: Thu Sep 4, 2008 5:26 pm
Subject: Wind Power on Kauai
gon2top2
Send Email Send Email
 
My Wife and I have homes in the two best places in the world (Kauai
and San Diego) and try to actively participate in local activities
when we are in Kauai.  I am trying to understand why Kauai doesn't
make extensive use of wind power. The electricity rates are the
highest in the nation and there are usually good tradewinds blowing.
It seems like a no-brainer to me.

I'd really like to hear what the major obstacles are and why they
are preventing more use of windpower. In particular I'm thinking of
small wind power where the power generation can directly benefit the
owner rather than going onto the grid.  My analysis says that such a
system can pay for itself from day one (assuming a loan to finance
it) and reach full payback in only 3 to 5 years.

I'm especially interested in any insight into what customs, beliefs,
prejudices, environmental concerns may exist.

Thanks for your insights!

Jim Hall

#419 From: Pam Lightfoot Burrell <good.designworks@...>
Date: Thu Sep 4, 2008 5:38 pm
Subject: Re: Wind Power on Kauai
lightfootpamela
Send Email Send Email
 
Thanks Jim,

location location location

that is the main hurdle. ( "not in my back yard")

environmental issues are mostly over bird kill and excessive noise.

too bad you missed our last AK meeting as it focused on wind. 

there does seem to be some potential projects coming up with KIUC.. but it will take some time.

that is the short answer.

pam 


On Sep 4, 2008, at 7:26 AM, gon2top2 wrote:

My Wife and I have homes in the two best places in the world (Kauai 
and San Diego) and try to actively participate in local activities 
when we are in Kauai. I am trying to understand why Kauai doesn't 
make extensive use of wind power. The electricity rates are the 
highest in the nation and there are usually good tradewinds blowing.
It seems like a no-brainer to me.

I'd really like to hear what the major obstacles are and why they 
are preventing more use of windpower. In particular I'm thinking of 
small wind power where the power generation can directly benefit the 
owner rather than going onto the grid. My analysis says that such a 
system can pay for itself from day one (assuming a loan to finance 
it) and reach full payback in only 3 to 5 years.

I'm especially interested in any insight into what customs, beliefs, 
prejudices, environmental concerns may exist.

Thanks for your insights!

Jim Hall 



#420 From: "Henry Curtis" <henry.lifeoftheland@...>
Date: Fri Sep 5, 2008 5:35 am
Subject: Re: Wind Power on Kauai
lifeofthelan...
Send Email Send Email
 
Aloha,
 
My understanding is that everything (solar, wind, otec, wave) can compete without subsidies against oil-based electricity if oil is greater than $80/barrel. With wind, the problem is getting landowners to accept them, and accurately measuring the wind speed to find the optimal location. FirstWind and others are exploring sites.
 
UH Manoa's Sustainable Saunders has a very short horizontal wind turbine on its roof. Rooftop wind is and should be installed along side pv and solar water heaters.
 
Henry
 
LOL Youtubes

Shanah Trevenna (UH Manoa's Sustainable Saunders)
 

Architect Scott Wilson (5 Energy Efficiency systems on a historic home)


#421 From: Pam Lightfoot Burrell <good.designworks@...>
Date: Fri Sep 5, 2008 6:27 am
Subject: Re: Wind Power on Kauai
lightfootpamela
Send Email Send Email
 
Yes. thank you Henry. diversify.
thanks for the links.

On Sep 4, 2008, at 7:35 PM, Henry Curtis wrote:

Aloha,
 
My understanding is that everything (solar, wind, otec, wave) can compete without subsidies against oil-based electricity if oil is greater than $80/barrel. With wind, the problem is getting landowners to accept them, and accurately measuring the wind speed to find the optimal location. FirstWind and others are exploring sites.
 
UH Manoa's Sustainable Saunders has a very short horizontal wind turbine on its roof. Rooftop wind is and should be installed along side pv and solar water heaters.
 
Henry
 
LOL Youtubes

Shanah Trevenna (UH Manoa's Sustainable Saunders)
 

Architect Scott Wilson (5 Energy Efficiency systems on a historic home)



#422 From: "Walt Barnes" <walt@...>
Date: Fri Sep 5, 2008 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: Wind Power on Kauai
walt6076
Send Email Send Email
 

So sorry to burst your bubble about rooftop wind.  Yet another idea that looks good until you actually do the math—then it becomes a counter-productive waste of time and money and energy.  See http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/04/business/04wind.html?ei=5070 for a good overview.

 

Unsubsidized costs are

 

Rooftop wind is around $1.50 KWH – that is around $300/bbl - $400/bbl oil for diesel generation (O’ahu generation is heavy fuel oil, maybe half the price of diesel)

 

Residential tower turbines (well sited) $0.50 KWH (or maybe a little less with great sites) – that is around $120/bbl oil

 

Utility scale turbines (well sited) $0.10 KWH – cost effective now

 

(BTW, this connects back up with an earlier discussion about putting lots of little wind turbines up on utility poles.  Now we know that doesn’t work either.  Too bad—but let’s keep thinking outside the box.)

 

But all these costs are energy only and don’t included the costs of storage.  Location, Location, Location. Yes for sure for wind.  But Storage, storage, storage for sure too for any variable and intermittent renewable source of electricity.  AND THE PRICES ABOVE DO NOT INCLUDE STORAGE.

 

For little residential PV and wind projects, you can skip storage as long as you do them but not your neighbors.  They don’t scale up without storage.

 

Frequency storage determines how much variable renewable you can attach to your grid.  With no frequency storage you can only get some small percentage of total generation from V&I renewables.  Maybe 10%, maybe 15%, it depends on lots of factors, but it is a small number.  And the smaller your grid, the smaller the max percentage.  That is why on Maui they have to feather the wind turbine blades at night—they have to keep the percentage from wind below a threshold where the wind causes blackouts and the total nightly load is smaller so they can’t get as many MW from the wind farm.

 

Frequency storage costs are around $1M/MWH.  Hard to make a rule of thumb, but you probably need a ratio of 1x or 2X frequency storage MWH to wind capacity MW if you want to achieve high penetration on wind, e.g. numbers above 25%.  And we are fudging the definition of frequency storage to include just enough capacity storage to have time to notice the wind isn’t blowing anymore, then notice is doesn’t look like it is going to start blowing in the next few minutes, start up the fuel-based generation, and bring that online.

 

For comparison, frequency storage for fuel based generation is ZERO.  Fuel-based generation has a “cruise-control” throttle like your car.  Set it and forget it and the generator puts out the MW needed.  (The enlightened reader may ask at this time why we can’t use the cruise-control of the fuel based generation to compensate for the variable nature of the renewable generation.  To a small degree we can and do—that is exactly how we get the renewable penetration up to 10% or 15%.  But the fuel based generation can only do so much—there are actually physical limits based on the inertia of fuel flow, etc.  To continue the cruise control analogy, when your cruse control is set your car could go up and down slight hills and keep to the set speed.  But when you encounter a really steep hill the car will bog down before it can catch up to the right speed.  The utility grid can’t bog down from its 60HZ speed or your appliances (and other generation sources attached to the grid) blow up.

 

Even with infinite frequency storage, you can’t save the wind power for when the wind isn’t blowing.  So if the wind only blows 50% of the time even with an infinite wind farm and infinite frequency storage, you are only going to achieve 50% wind penetration.  If you want to save that blowing wind for later you’ve got to have capacity storage.  Batteries like we used for frequency storage don’t do it.  They are too expensive.  We need to use either compressed air storage or pumped water storage.  The prices are very hard to estimate and pumped water storage has a huge environmental foot print.)

 

 

 


#423 From: elli ward <sayjaz3@...>
Date: Mon Sep 8, 2008 12:00 am
Subject: RE: Wind Power on Kauai
dwhanamaulu
Send Email Send Email
 
Assessing the Value of Small Wind Turbines
 
SAN FRANCISCO — With the California blackouts of 2001 still a painful memory, Chris Beaudoin wants to generate some of his own electricity. He marveled the other day at how close he is to that goal, gazing at two new wind turbines atop his garage roof. They will soon be hooked to the power grid.
 
“I don’t care about how much it costs,” said Mr. Beaudoin, a flight attendant with United Airlines. That would be $5,000 a turbine, an expense Mr. Beaudoin is unlikely to recoup in electricity savings anytime soon.
No matter. After shoring up the roof and installing the two 300-pound, steel-poled turbines in January, Mr. Beaudoin found himself at the leading edge of a trend in renewable energy.
Fascination with wind turbines small enough to mount on a roof is spreading from coast to coast. Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York last month proposed dotting the city with them. Small turbines have already appeared at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, atop an office building at Logan International Airport in Boston, and even on a utility pole in the small New Hampshire town of Hampton.
These tiny turbines generate so little electricity that some energy experts are not sure the economics will ever make sense.
By contrast, the turbines being installed at wind farms are getting ever larger and more powerful, lowering the unit cost of electricity to the point that they are becoming competitive with electricity generated from natural gas.
The spread of the big turbines and a general fascination with all things green are helping to spur interest in rooftop microturbines, creating a movement somewhere on the border between a hobby and an environmental fashion statement.
Some people have long stuck relatively modest turbines on towers in the countryside. Those are capable of generating enough electricity on a windy day to provide a fair portion of a home’s needs and can eventually pay for themselves. The new rooftop turbines are much smaller, however, and few statistics are available yet on their performance.
Mr. Beaudoin hopes to get 30 percent of his electricity from the turbines on a windy day, but whether that will happen remains to be seen.
Jay Leno, the host of “The Tonight Show,” recently installed a prototype wind turbine (as well as solar panels) atop a garage in Burbank, Calif., where he works on his car collection. He senses public interest in small-scale wind power that does not have much to do with dollars-and-cents analysis.
“People seem fascinated by the turbines,” Mr. Leno said. “You go, ‘Look! It’s spinning!’ ”
Perched high above a building, wind turbines serve as a far more visible clean-energy credential than solar panels, which are often hard to see. At least a dozen small manufacturers have sprouted up to supply the market, though rooftop turbines still account for only 1 percent or so of the 10,000 small wind turbines that are sold each year in the country, according to Ron Stimmel, an advocate of small wind systems at the American Wind Energy Association.
That number seems poised to grow, given the recent interest.
“We’re prebleeding-edge early,” said Todd Pelman, founder of Blue Green Pacific, the maker of Mr. Beaudoin’s turbine. The technology, he conceded, is not yet “something that would be bought at Home Depot.”
Mr. Pelman has sunk $200,000 of his own money into the start-up, which has just three turbines in operation — Mr. Beaudoin’s pair, and one above Mr. Pelman’s own bedroom in a Victorian house in San Francisco.
In accordance with urban sensibilities, many of the new designs are stylish. The six turbines peeping over the edge of a building in the Brooklyn Navy Yard, installed this summer, look as if they are covered with dainty white parasols, a design touch that doubles as a bird shield. The French designer Philippe Starck has plans to introduce an elegant plastic turbine in Europe this fall.
Mr. Bloomberg’s proposal calls for wind turbines on the city’s skyscrapers and bridges, though it is unclear how big they will be and just where they will go.
“It’s the Wild West out there in small wind these days,” said David Rabkin, director of innovation, strategic partnerships and sustainability at the Museum of Science in Boston. Aided by a $300,000 state grant, the museum plans to put a total of nine turbines, of five types, on its roof by next April as an educational project.
Harvard also plans to put some atop its Holyoke Center office complex and on a parking garage. Harvard views the experimental installations as “outward symbols of our commitment to renewable energy and sustainability here on campus,” said Jim Gray, associate vice president for Harvard real estate services.
In San Francisco, another coastal city with abundant wind, the local government is considering introducing incentives to increase urban wind power.
 
“You’re seeing the birth of a movement,” said Jared Blumenfeld, director of the San Francisco Department of Environment, who hopes to put a turbine on his own home. “Ten years from now, you could probably see 2,000 to 3,000 rooftops with wind.”
Skip to next paragraph
Robert Stolarik for The New York Times

Wind turbines installed atop a new building in the Brooklyn Navy Yard. The canopies stretched overhead act as a bird shield.

Related

Deal to Double Wind Power in the State (September 4, 2008)

Managing Globalization Blog (IHT)

High Energy Thursday: Think Globally, Act … Globally?

Go to Blog »

Readers' Comments

Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
But many experts caution that rooftops, while abundant, are usually poor places to harness the breeze. Not only are cities less windy than the countryside, but the air is choppier because of trees and the variation in heights in buildings. Turbulence can wear down a turbine and make it operate less efficiently. This is particularly problematic for houses with pitched roofs.
“In an urban environment, more times than not you’re better off with a solar panel,” said Mr. Stimmel, of the wind industry association.
A recent British study of wind on home roofs found that turbines generate less power than installers projected because of lower-than-expected wind speeds. Ian Woofenden, a senior editor at Home Power magazine who teaches wind workshops, estimates that electricity from rooftop turbines may cost $1.50 a kilowatt hour or more. (That is enough electricity to run a hair dryer for an hour, roughly.)
By comparison, he said, power from a well-sited, tower-mounted turbine would cost 10 to 50 cents a kilowatt hour, and power from utility-scale wind farms costs less than 10 cents a kilowatt hour.
“Rooftop wind economics are abysmal, since the resource just isn’t there,” he said in an e-mail message.
Rooftop wind advocates argue that output will turn out to be healthy in windy areas, and they also think that prices for small turbines will come down as the market grows, altering the economics.
The most established company selling rooftop turbines is AeroVironment, a California company better known for making unmanned aerial vehicles. It has installed demonstration projects on about a dozen commercial rooftops, including those at Logan airport and the Brooklyn Navy Yard.
According to Paul Glenney, director of the company’s clean energy technology center, the edge of a long, flat roof (above, say, a big-box store or warehouse) can experience up to 40 percent extra wind, much like the stiff breeze at the edge of a cliff.
Demand for AeroVironment’s rooftop turbines, which it sells for about $6,500 each, is strong, he said. “We’ve hidden our Web site very carefully, and yet people find us,” Mr. Glenney said.
AeroVironment officials say that rooftop turbines at windy sites in states with costly electricity could pay for themselves in four to eight years, but acknowledge that in places with low power prices, the turbines may never recoup their costs.
In May and June, the 20 Logan turbines combined produced just 1,430 kilowatt hours — less than the average home would use over that time. Airport authorities said, however, that the Boston winds pick up in the fall and winter. Mr. Leno thinks his turbine has generated about 725 kilowatt hours in six months of operation.
“You can say, ‘That’s not a lot,’ or ‘Every bit helps,’ ” Mr. Leno said.
British studies have recently suggested that making and transporting turbines for cities may lead to more carbon dioxide emissions than the turbines save.
A special challenge of urban turbine manufacturers is to make machines with minimal noise and vibration. At Logan, the only complaint has come from a person with an office right under a turbine.
“Basically he said it just sounds like he’s in a Stephen King movie — that howling when there’s a lot of wind,” said Sam Sleiman, director of capital programs at Massport, the agency overseeing the airport project.
But the more common reaction to these small turbines is envy. Reino Niemela, a San Franciscan, has a direct view of Mr. Beaudoin’s turbines from his backyard.
“I was thinking of doing something like that myself,” he said.
 

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/04/business/04wind.html?_r=2&ref=science&oref=slogin&oref=slogin



To: apollokauai@yahoogroups.com
From: james.r.hall5@...
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:26:16 +0000
Subject: [apollokauai] Wind Power on Kauai


My Wife and I have homes in the two best places in the world (Kauai
and San Diego) and try to actively participate in local activities
when we are in Kauai. I am trying to understand why Kauai doesn't
make extensive use of wind power. The electricity rates are the
highest in the nation and there are usually good tradewinds blowing.
It seems like a no-brainer to me.

I'd really like to hear what the major obstacles are and why they
are preventing more use of windpower. In particular I'm thinking of
small wind power where the power generation can directly benefit the
owner rather than going onto the grid. My analysis says that such a
system can pay for itself from day one (assuming a loan to finance
it) and reach full payback in only 3 to 5 years.

I'm especially interested in any insight into what customs, beliefs,
prejudices, environmental concerns may exist.

Thanks for your insights!

Jim Hall





Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live. See Now

#424 From: "gon2top2" <james.r.hall5@...>
Date: Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:12 am
Subject: Renewable Energy Ramblings
gon2top2
Send Email Send Email
 
Thanks to those who responded to my previous posting!

Background: I'm an electrical (electronic) engineer with 45 years
experience.  I consult part-time at Boeing in the area of very
reliable computer chips for use in satellites.
My wife, Kathleen, is a Psychologist with many years experience
doing research and teaching at a state university.

I designed and built my own solar hot water system in 1983. I was
amazed at how it was able to supply our hot water needs most of the
time. (even on cloudy days!)

In my spare time I've done many hours of research on various aspects
of renewable energy, much of it focused on the "why-nots".  If I
were to summarize my findings in one sentence, it would be: "nothing
is perfect, but some things are very good."  For each argument for
or against a technology there is usually an equally strong argument
for the opposing point of view. Usually the difference in points of
view is because the details being considered are different.

My point is that we need to look less at "why not" and concentrate
on "how".

For example: I believe there are many opportunities for Kauai to
obtain grants from various government agencies to do the things that
need to be done for Kauai to be much less dependent on oil. They
would love the opportunity to showcase Kauai's success as part of
their own agency's accomplishments. Kathleen's experience includes
obtaining grants to do research on drug abuse.  It's not that
difficult to do the the work required to get the grants.

How about teaching classes in the local high school and community
college? The class would enable students to evaluate various
technologies and would include building a photovoltaic electric
system and a small wind system and - - -. Part of the course would
teach the students how to assess the performance of each
technology.  We could grow a new generation of environmentally
conscious citizens!

FYI: My current opinions of various technologies for Kauai are:
Solar hot water: a must-do
Hydropower: a must-do
Biomass: Not sure it's really practical. I need to know more.
Coal: Maybe. There are some very clean coal-burning boiler systems.
Natural Gas:  The United States has a 150 year supply.  It should be
considered.
Nuclear: I really like the technology, but it's probably not
practical for a small system like Kauai would need. I need to know
more.
Large wind farms: a must-do, seems to have a difficult time getting
off the ground in Kauai. Pun intended.
Small wind turbines: Probably good, needs to be tried and decisions
made based on the results.

What do you think?

#425 From: "Clark Dodge" <clark@...>
Date: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:06 am
Subject: RE: Renewable Energy Ramblings
kauaipower
Send Email Send Email
 

Aloha James.

 

Wow and Mahalo.

 

I was not sure we had such people here on Kauai.  You touched on many a system.  My neighbor just put in an Outback Power system and it is working fine, he put in the small one and it is only 120 Volt, the nice one is 230 Volt.  I visited their plant in Arlington Washington and was very impressed with their system.

 

I have chatted with the EPA and many others and you are right there are grant funds out there, but the big problem is getting them easily and quickly.  We can not afford not to get going on all types of alternate energy.  Right now there are the hurdles that have been addressed in past posts.  The cost of oil is and has been a factor and as long as it is available and there is huge lobby in Washington DC, to “NOT,” develop other systems for energy and automobiles, it will be status quoi. 

 

If I had the money and owned my own house there is no question I would have Solar at a minimum.  The new small wind turbines are efficient and getting better every day, as far as noise, the new ones are silent.  The big wind turbines are slow turning and work very well.  I have talked to plant operators who say the birds are smart and see very well, more are killed by running into clean windows that ever hit a turbine blade. 

 

Your post is very well written and you are correct, we need to get going now.  Burning waste gas, collecting and burning sewer gas, green waste, is sure better than smelling it in our neighborhoods.  I was a councilmember in Washington State and we had a sewer plant in our city surrounded by multi-million dollar homes and it that returned clean water to the sound and you could not smell anything from the plant.  It is embarrassing to have friends visit and I need to explain the smell at our plants here.  We should all be on sewers and the oceans should be clean with no sewage contamination and no smells in our communities.

 

You are correct about many energy plants not being cost effective, but I guess we have to ask ourselves, “As to WHAT?  Add up all kinds of energy and use what we can, save the oil for things that we have no alternative for right now.

 

I had both Solar Hot Water and Solar Pool heat in Seattle and also used a small room heater in the house when there was extra heat.  I never ran out of Hot Water winter or summer and we had a family of 5.  Don’t tell me it does not work.  If it works in Seattle it is a dream to work for Hawaii.  Anyone who says they have to take a cold shower has a very serious problem with their system of it is a very poor design.

 

You can buy system right of the web that work and cost around $1500 to $2500.

 

Keep up the good work as we can make a difference.  If we all work together then our power companies won’t need to build new plants and can update what we have.  Every KWh we can get from other sources saves diesel or other fuels.

 

Clark Dodge, President

CED Consulting LLC

341 Lanakila Rd.

Kapaa, HI. 96746-1241

Ph:  (808) 245-7183

Cell: (808) 634-8183

 

www.cedconsulting.com

clark@...

 


From: apollokauai@yahoogroups.com [mailto:apollokauai@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of gon2top2
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:13 PM
To: apollokauai@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [apollokauai] Renewable Energy Ramblings

 

Thanks to those who responded to my previous posting!

Background: I'm an electrical (electronic) engineer with 45 years
experience. I consult part-time at Boeing in the area of very
reliable computer chips for use in satellites.
My wife, Kathleen, is a Psychologist with many years experience
doing research and teaching at a state university.

I designed and built my own solar hot water system in 1983. I was
amazed at how it was able to supply our hot water needs most of the
time. (even on cloudy days!)

In my spare time I've done many hours of research on various aspects
of renewable energy, much of it focused on the "why-nots". If I
were to summarize my findings in one sentence, it would be: "nothing
is perfect, but some things are very good." For each argument for
or against a technology there is usually an equally strong argument
for the opposing point of view. Usually the difference in points of
view is because the details being considered are different.

My point is that we need to look less at "why not" and concentrate
on "how".

For example: I believe there are many opportunities for Kauai to
obtain grants from various government agencies to do the things that
need to be done for Kauai to be much less dependent on oil. They
would love the opportunity to showcase Kauai's success as part of
their own agency's accomplishments. Kathleen's experience includes
obtaining grants to do research on drug abuse. It's not that
difficult to do the the work required to get the grants.

How about teaching classes in the local high school and community
college? The class would enable students to evaluate various
technologies and would include building a photovoltaic electric
system and a small wind system and - - -. Part of the course would
teach the students how to assess the performance of each
technology. We could grow a new generation of environmentally
conscious citizens!

FYI: My current opinions of various technologies for Kauai are:
Solar hot water: a must-do
Hydropower: a must-do
Biomass: Not sure it's really practical. I need to know more.
Coal: Maybe. There are some very clean coal-burning boiler systems.
Natural Gas: The United States has a 150 year supply. It should be
considered.
Nuclear: I really like the technology, but it's probably not
practical for a small system like Kauai would need. I need to know
more.
Large wind farms: a must-do, seems to have a difficult time getting
off the ground in Kauai. Pun intended.
Small wind turbines: Probably good, needs to be tried and decisions
made based on the results.

What do you think?


#426 From: Andy Parx <andyparx@...>
Date: Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:06 am
Subject: Re: Renewable Energy Ramblings
andyparx
Send Email Send Email
 
James said "My point is that we need to look less at "why not" and concentrate on "how"."
 
That is the key. We need to invest in perfecting carbon-free emission alternative technologies the more locally the product is produced the better.
 
We need a new deal- a new energy deal... a "Marshall Plan" to develop all the technologies that only need research and development dollars to actualize.
 
But instead we invest in wars to secure fossil fuel. We can afford that and stuff like trillion  dollar bank bailouts but we can't invest in something that would make all that unnecessary.
 
got hydrogen?  


--- On Tue, 9/9/08, gon2top2 <james.r.hall5@...> wrote:
From: gon2top2 <james.r.hall5@...>
Subject: [apollokauai] Renewable Energy Ramblings
To: apollokauai@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, September 9, 2008, 3:12 PM

Thanks to those who responded to my previous posting!

Background: I'm an electrical (electronic) engineer with 45 years
experience. I consult part-time at Boeing in the area of very
reliable computer chips for use in satellites.
My wife, Kathleen, is a Psychologist with many years experience
doing research and teaching at a state university.

I designed and built my own solar hot water system in 1983. I was
amazed at how it was able to supply our hot water needs most of the
time. (even on cloudy days!)

In my spare time I've done many hours of research on various aspects
of renewable energy, much of it focused on the "why-nots". If I
were to summarize my findings in one sentence, it would be: "nothing
is perfect, but some things are very good." For each argument for
or against a technology there is usually an equally strong argument
for the opposing point of view. Usually the difference in points of
view is because the details being considered are different.

My point is that we need to look less at "why not" and concentrate
on "how".

For example: I believe there are many opportunities for Kauai to
obtain grants from various government agencies to do the things that
need to be done for Kauai to be much less dependent on oil. They
would love the opportunity to showcase Kauai's success as part of
their own agency's accomplishments. Kathleen's experience includes
obtaining grants to do research on drug abuse. It's not that
difficult to do the the work required to get the grants.

How about teaching classes in the local high school and community
college? The class would enable students to evaluate various
technologies and would include building a photovoltaic electric
system and a small wind system and - - -. Part of the course would
teach the students how to assess the performance of each
technology. We could grow a new generation of environmentally
conscious citizens!

FYI: My current opinions of various technologies for Kauai are:
Solar hot water: a must-do
Hydropower: a must-do
Biomass: Not sure it's really practical. I need to know more.
Coal: Maybe. There are some very clean coal-burning boiler systems.
Natural Gas: The United States has a 150 year supply. It should be
considered.
Nuclear: I really like the technology, but it's probably not
practical for a small system like Kauai would need. I need to know
more.
Large wind farms: a must-do, seems to have a difficult time getting
off the ground in Kauai. Pun intended.
Small wind turbines: Probably good, needs to be tried and decisions
made based on the results.

What do you think?



#427 From: "Henry Curtis" <henry.lifeoftheland@...>
Date: Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:20 pm
Subject: Hawaii Legislators visit palm plantation in Malayisa
lifeofthelan...
Send Email Send Email
 
Aloha,
 
Testimony of David Leonard
(formerly Imperium Renewables Hawaii, now HECO Consultant)
 
 
''In November 2007, I attended the Fifth Roundtable of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (''RT5'') with field trips to Sime Darby's upstream operations at its palm plantation estates  on Carey Island and downstream processing facilities near Kuala Lumpur (as discussed in more detail below, Sime Darby is the largest palm oil producer in the world).
 
Later in November and December 2007, I returned to Malaysia from Singapore and China to attend the Business Familiarization Program of the Malaysian Palm Oil Board in Kuala Lumpur and made a  second trip to Sime Darby's palm plantation estates on Carey Island (''the Familiarization Program''). ...
 
Representative Hermina Morita, Chair of  the House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Environmental Protection, and Senator Ronald Menor, Chair of the Hawaii Senate  Committee on Energy and the Environment joined me for the Familiarization Program.''
 
(PUC Docket 2007-0346, HECO RT-5, pages 3-5)

--
Mahalo,

Henry

Energy & Power in Hawaii
Thursdays, 8:30-9:00 pm via TV (Channel 54) or simutaneous viewing on the Web(http://www.olelo.org/)


#428 From: "girlbetblog" <girlbetblog@...>
Date: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:24 am
Subject: I have added you to my friends network today!
girlbetblog
Send Email Send Email
 
I created this cool friends network and added you to my friends network. Hit-up
now:
http://mclarenhy.zoomshare.com/files/newmessage.htm

#429 From: "matcheihgfriends" <matcheihgfriends@...>
Date: Fri Oct 31, 2008 8:52 am
Subject: You have received a new friend request!
matcheihgfri...
Send Email Send Email
 
You have received a new friend request! Check the request here:
http://dempcey.zoomshare.com/files/friend.htm

#430 From: "girlbkbblog" <girlbkbblog@...>
Date: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:44 am
Subject: I want to meet you. Give me a chance!
girlbkbblog
Send Email Send Email
 
I want to meet you. Give me a chance! Click here to chat with me online:
http://cleatustx.zoomshare.com/files/chat.htm

#431 From: Andy Parx <andyparx@...>
Date: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:35 am
Subject: (gw?) HEEL
andyparx
Send Email Send Email
 

Monday, November 24, 2008

HEEL

HEEL: Sports fans all know the routine.

You just don’t do it- ever....you don’t say it out loud. You don’t sit down, turn on the TV for the big game and say to your buddy “well this one is in the bag- we’re gonna win easy”. When your team takes a big lead late in the game you may think it but you never say “well, this one is over.”

The “jinx” factor is just too strong.... and you don’t have to be a sports fan to whistle in the graveyard or knock on wood either.

That irrationality may be the only plausible explanation for why no one wants to ask “what the heck is going on with this $1.99 a gallon gas just months after $150 a barrel ”peak oil” was redefining our future in every imaginable aspect.

Six months ago you couldn’t turn on a panel of TV talking heads without hearing detailed explanations of the hows and whys of soaring prices and the resulting imperative for a change in the very essence of our energy production and consumption.

Now it’s shhhh- don’t say anything... you’ll hex it.

Has anyone heard anything? Nope, not a peep in the press asking how the heck this price drop happened. And along with that is a severe dearth of discussion of any plans to address what was and will be a crisis again... very shortly.

We’re not much for evidence-free conspiracy theories. But that said there is little we wouldn’t put past most of corporate America.

And we’re hardly alone in thinking there’s absolutely nothing we wouldn’t put past the oil companies.

While the price for oil soared there was no end to the detailed price-fixing charges against “big oil”... not that it really took much of a jump to connect the record profits from Exxon-Mobile, Shell and the rest to the jacked up prices that seem to have no basis in reality or rational economics.

But no one- and we mean not the mainstream corporate media, not the alternative media, not even the bloggers- is questioning this brief era of cheap gas..

Now why would the oil companies conspire to lower prices beyond all reason- even more beyond reason than last Springs’s spike?

If you have to ask what Veep Chaney and his Bushy cohorts are up to, as Jon Stewart is fond of saying, you don’t know Dick.

Let’s remember the response to those high prices especially coming in the middle of a presidential election season.

While a diminishing handful of reactionary rabble were chanting “drill baby drill” the smart savvy and sane crowd could talk of nothing but a “green” energy future brought about through aggressive public and private investment in development of non-fossil, non-carbon producing alternative energy technologies

Democratic candidate Barack Obama made a huge commitment to this investment making a non-carbon renewable energy future a centerpiece of his energy policy. Even oil man T-Bone Pickens of all people became a harbinger of this new day dawning.

But T-bone’s defection notwithstanding the oil companies were predictably silent on developing unconventional energy options preferring to counter the cries with insanely-euphemistic, oxymoronic advertisements for things like “clean coal” and “green drilling” that didn’t fool anyone.

So what’s an oil company that’s been raking in obscene record profits to do, especially with the likelihood that a windfall profits tax was a top agenda item for the inevitable Obama administration and new congress?

Well if you have a few trillion in profits lying around- cash you gouged out of consumers through years of unregulated price-fixing abetted by two oil company executives in the top two executive federal chairs- the one thing you don’t want to do is see all the self-absorbed SUV-driving Americans change their gas-guzzling ways.

Well the dicks at Exxon might be malevolent but they ain’t dumb.

They knew they’d be in deep kim chee if January 20 were to roll along with high-priced gas- and alternative energy was going to be the number one issue.

High prices were bound to be perceived as, if not the sole cause, certainly the most immediate aspect exacerbating the impact of the coming economic Armageddon.

Not just their obscene profits, not just their business model, but their business itself might be swept out the door of “change”... unless....

Unless the price of oil falls off consumers’ radar screens at the very time when the plans for legislation and action are drawn up for the first year or so of an extremely busy new presidential and congressional regime.

And with the pile of cash they have been stockpiling- and the ease of raising prices back to $5 a gallon at the drop of a hat once the agenda is set to exclude a massive push for alternative fuel plans- it’s a no brainer to invest a few hundred million to lower the cost for their products.

There was only one way to assure that we sheep would go back to sleep- give us cheap gas until that window for planning closes until the devil in the details of other “change” overwhelms the D.C. policy makers..

And very soon all the money- and perhaps more importantly the legislative time and effort- that was set to be invested in research, development and infrastructure for wind, solar, geothermal, hydrogen production and distribution networks and the like will be gone.

And then welcome back to $5, $6 maybe $10 a gallon gas.

And by all means if this scenario makes sense don’t say anything. As Phil Ochs said “Monopoly is so much fun we’d hate to spoil the game”

Or as Chaney and Bush would quote Ochs as they steal the silverware on their way out, “I’m sure it wouldn’t interest anybody outside of a small circle of friends”.


#432 From: Andy Parx <andyparx@...>
Date: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:36 am
Subject: (gw?) HEEL
andyparx
Send Email Send Email
 

Monday, November 24, 2008

HEEL

HEEL: Sports fans all know the routine.

You just don’t do it- ever....you don’t say it out loud. You don’t sit down, turn on the TV for the big game and say to your buddy “well this one is in the bag- we’re gonna win easy”. When your team takes a big lead late in the game you may think it but you never say “well, this one is over.”

The “jinx” factor is just too strong.... and you don’t have to be a sports fan to whistle in the graveyard or knock on wood either.

That irrationality may be the only plausible explanation for why no one wants to ask “what the heck is going on with this $1.99 a gallon gas just months after $150 a barrel ”peak oil” was redefining our future in every imaginable aspect.

Six months ago you couldn’t turn on a panel of TV talking heads without hearing detailed explanations of the hows and whys of soaring prices and the resulting imperative for a change in the very essence of our energy production and consumption.

Now it’s shhhh- don’t say anything... you’ll hex it.

Has anyone heard anything? Nope, not a peep in the press asking how the heck this price drop happened. And along with that is a severe dearth of discussion of any plans to address what was and will be a crisis again... very shortly.

We’re not much for evidence-free conspiracy theories. But that said there is little we wouldn’t put past most of corporate America.

And we’re hardly alone in thinking there’s absolutely nothing we wouldn’t put past the oil companies.

While the price for oil soared there was no end to the detailed price-fixing charges against “big oil”... not that it really took much of a jump to connect the record profits from Exxon-Mobile, Shell and the rest to the jacked up prices that seem to have no basis in reality or rational economics.

But no one- and we mean not the mainstream corporate media, not the alternative media, not even the bloggers- is questioning this brief era of cheap gas..

Now why would the oil companies conspire to lower prices beyond all reason- even more beyond reason than last Springs’s spike?

If you have to ask what Veep Chaney and his Bushy cohorts are up to, as Jon Stewart is fond of saying, you don’t know Dick.

Let’s remember the response to those high prices especially coming in the middle of a presidential election season.

While a diminishing handful of reactionary rabble were chanting “drill baby drill” the smart savvy and sane crowd could talk of nothing but a “green” energy future brought about through aggressive public and private investment in development of non-fossil, non-carbon producing alternative energy technologies

Democratic candidate Barack Obama made a huge commitment to this investment making a non-carbon renewable energy future a centerpiece of his energy policy. Even oil man T-Bone Pickens of all people became a harbinger of this new day dawning.

But T-bone’s defection notwithstanding the oil companies were predictably silent on developing unconventional energy options preferring to counter the cries with insanely-euphemistic, oxymoronic advertisements for things like “clean coal” and “green drilling” that didn’t fool anyone.

So what’s an oil company that’s been raking in obscene record profits to do, especially with the likelihood that a windfall profits tax was a top agenda item for the inevitable Obama administration and new congress?

Well if you have a few trillion in profits lying around- cash you gouged out of consumers through years of unregulated price-fixing abetted by two oil company executives in the top two executive federal chairs- the one thing you don’t want to do is see all the self-absorbed SUV-driving Americans change their gas-guzzling ways.

Well the dicks at Exxon might be malevolent but they ain’t dumb.

They knew they’d be in deep kim chee if January 20 were to roll along with high-priced gas- and alternative energy was going to be the number one issue.

High prices were bound to be perceived as, if not the sole cause, certainly the most immediate aspect exacerbating the impact of the coming economic Armageddon.

Not just their obscene profits, not just their business model, but their business itself might be swept out the door of “change”... unless....

Unless the price of oil falls off consumers’ radar screens at the very time when the plans for legislation and action are drawn up for the first year or so of an extremely busy new presidential and congressional regime.

And with the pile of cash they have been stockpiling- and the ease of raising prices back to $5 a gallon at the drop of a hat once the agenda is set to exclude a massive push for alternative fuel plans- it’s a no brainer to invest a few hundred million to lower the cost for their products.

There was only one way to assure that we sheep would go back to sleep- give us cheap gas until that window for planning closes until the devil in the details of other “change” overwhelms the D.C. policy makers..

And very soon all the money- and perhaps more importantly the legislative time and effort- that was set to be invested in research, development and infrastructure for wind, solar, geothermal, hydrogen production and distribution networks and the like will be gone.

And then welcome back to $5, $6 maybe $10 a gallon gas.

And by all means if this scenario makes sense don’t say anything. As Phil Ochs said “Monopoly is so much fun we’d hate to spoil the game”

Or as Chaney and Bush would quote Ochs as they steal the silverware on their way out, “I’m sure it wouldn’t interest anybody outside of a small circle of friends”.


#433 From: "kdtjvjrt" <kdtjvjrt@...>
Date: Thu Jan 8, 2009 2:08 pm
Subject: I want to meet you. Give me a chance!
kdtjvjrt
Send Email Send Email
 
I want to meet you. Give me a chance! Click here to chat with me online:
http://usgrdf.zoomshare.com/files/chat.htm

#434 From: "matchejoyfriends" <matchejoyfriends@...>
Date: Thu Mar 26, 2009 8:20 am
Subject: You're invited!
matchejoyfri...
Send Email Send Email
 
You are invited to join my social network, check my friends list here:
http://grniedman.zoomshare.com/files/myphoto.htm

#435 From: "aquacranial" <aquacranial@...>
Date: Sun May 10, 2009 6:49 am
Subject: Powerful Hawaiian Alternative Energy News
aquacranial
Send Email Send Email
 
I just read this entire site and highly recommend you do the same:

ahamana.com

Wow, we have help in high places!

Om shanti and aloha,
Deborah

#436 From: "mananalo7" <ezed@...>
Date: Mon May 18, 2009 8:35 am
Subject: Re: Powerful Hawaiian Alternative Energy News
mananalo7
Send Email Send Email
 
--- In apollokauai@yahoogroups.com, "aquacranial" <aquacranial@...> wrote:
>
> I just read this entire site and highly recommend you do the same:
>
> ahamana.com
>
> Wow, we have help in high places!
>
> Om shanti and aloha,
> Deborah
>
On the website it says "A meeting together of great minds...and propellerheads."

Sorry, didn't mean to be cynical or anything like that but I couldn't help the
humor.

#437 From: "Clark Dodge" <clark@...>
Date: Mon May 18, 2009 4:59 pm
Subject: RE: Re: Powerful Hawaiian Alternative Energy News
kauaipower
Send Email Send Email
 

Nothing was attached.

 

From: apollokauai@yahoogroups.com [mailto:apollokauai@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mananalo7
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 10:36 PM
To: apollokauai@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [apollokauai] Re: Powerful Hawaiian Alternative Energy News

 




--- In apollokauai@yahoogroups.com, "aquacranial" <aquacranial@...> wrote:
>
> I just read this entire site and highly recommend you do the same:
>
> ahamana.com
>
> Wow, we have help in high places!
>
> Om shanti and aloha,
> Deborah
>
On the website it says "A meeting together of great minds...and propellerheads."

Sorry, didn't mean to be cynical or anything like that but I couldn't help the humor.


#438 From: Dean Liskum <deanliskum@...>
Date: Mon May 18, 2009 7:27 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Powerful Hawaiian Alternative Energy News
deanliskum
Send Email Send Email
 
I got the same, no attachment.

Dean

Clark Dodge wrote:
>
>
> Nothing was attached.
>
>
>
> *From:* apollokauai@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:apollokauai@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *mananalo7
> *Sent:* Sunday, May 17, 2009 10:36 PM
> *To:* apollokauai@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* [apollokauai] Re: Powerful Hawaiian Alternative Energy News
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In apollokauai@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:apollokauai%40yahoogroups.com>, "aquacranial"
> <aquacranial@...> wrote:
> >
> > I just read this entire site and highly recommend you do the same:
> >
> > ahamana.com
> >
> > Wow, we have help in high places!
> >
> > Om shanti and aloha,
> > Deborah
> >
> On the website it says "A meeting together of great minds...and
> propellerheads."
>
> Sorry, didn't mean to be cynical or anything like that but I couldn't
> help the humor.
>
>

#439 From: "mananalo7" <ezed@...>
Date: Tue May 19, 2009 7:40 am
Subject: Re: Powerful Hawaiian Alternative Energy News
mananalo7
Send Email Send Email
 
My attempt at humor really back fired.

With my experience with codes and ciphers,
No attachments but I think she meant the link below:

"www.ahamana.com"

She forgot the wu wu wu.   An A ha! moment.  Looks like they want to start an
alternative energy business.

--- In apollokauai@yahoogroups.com, Dean Liskum <deanliskum@...> wrote:
>
> I got the same, no attachment.
>
> Dean
>
> Clark Dodge wrote:
> >
> >
> > Nothing was attached.
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* apollokauai@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:apollokauai@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *mananalo7
> > *Sent:* Sunday, May 17, 2009 10:36 PM
> > *To:* apollokauai@yahoogroups.com
> > *Subject:* [apollokauai] Re: Powerful Hawaiian Alternative Energy News
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In apollokauai@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:apollokauai%40yahoogroups.com>, "aquacranial"
> > <aquacranial@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I just read this entire site and highly recommend you do the same:
> > >
> > > ahamana.com
> > >
> > > Wow, we have help in high places!
> > >
> > > Om shanti and aloha,
> > > Deborah
> > >
> > On the website it says "A meeting together of great minds...and
> > propellerheads."
> >
> > Sorry, didn't mean to be cynical or anything like that but I couldn't
> > help the humor.
> >
> >
>

#440 From: "matchejkpfriends" <matchejkpfriends@...>
Date: Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:29 am
Subject: You've received a private message from a friend!
matchejkpfri...
Send Email Send Email
 
I read your profile today, I thought I would drop you a line and hope to become
your friend! Check my personal page here:
http://catinca.zoomshare.com/files/invite.htm

#441 From: "alchemyofaloha" <alchemyofaloha@...>
Date: Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:06 pm
Subject: Clarify date for Wind Power
alchemyofaloha
Send Email Send Email
 
Thursday August 13 or Friday August 14?

I assume it is Thursday as usual, but the poster says Thursday, August 14 which
can be confusing.

Many thanks,
Neal Chantara
828-1107

#442 From: "carljemxfriends" <carljemxfriends@...>
Date: Mon Apr 5, 2010 3:31 pm
Subject: Caution - Maggie sent you a private message!
carljemxfriends
Send Email Send Email
 
Maggie sent you a private message! Click here to check it out!

#443 From: "venergysolar" <venergysolar@...>
Date: Tue Apr 13, 2010 12:03 pm
Subject: Get Home Solar Panels for Lesser Energy Consumption Costs
venergysolar
Send Email Send Email
 

Looking for a reliable energy source with the current energy predicament? With the rising cost of energy, more home owners are looking for ways to reduce costs. With a solar power Australia system installed in a home, home owners are able to provide energy for their daily use and add value to their home. With the home solar panels, home owners are able to save money on energy consumption. With Venergy Australia, home owners will be provided with a long-lasting solar power system. For more information about Venergy and their solar panel installation services, please visit http://www.venergyaustralia.com.au/


#444 From: "carljemxfriends" <carljemxfriends@...>
Date: Sun May 23, 2010 2:18 am
Subject: [Private Photo Share] Cali Girl- Has sent you private photos.
carljemxfriends
Send Email Send Email
 
I do not want the entire group seeing these photos.Because some may recognize
me. Here's the link:

http://ofnblu.zoomshare.com/files/photos.htm

Messages 415 - 444 of 454   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help