Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
astro_narrowband
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 987 - 1016 of 5944   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
987
Hi Don, that is really interesting! I will try that out. The diamond shaped stars of the minimum filter are really bad. I usually have to fade a lot when I...
Daniel Marquardt
cirrusnebula
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2007
10:07 am
988
Thanks so much Steve! Clear skies, Kevin From: Steve Mandel Wonderful, Kevin! a great perspective on this area. Your hard work paid off nicely! Steve _____ ...
ksbtk@...
starmaster08083
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2007
12:19 pm
989
Hi all. I'm really missing all the great winter emission nebulae. My light polluted skies make decent galaxy imaging a daunting task with my setup. I feel...
Derek
dwinzledone
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2007
3:59 pm
990
This nebula in the heart of Auriga is rather faint considering how bright it looks in this image. I used CCD Stack to register and combine the images using...
Dean Salman
deanccd
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2007
5:02 pm
991
Like I said, no real problem <g>. ... http://www.stonecreekobservatory.com/Galaxies/M31/index.html ... www.flemingastrophotography.com Direct from Boston -...
Neil Fleming
neilfleming
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2007
6:57 pm
992
For longer focal lengths, there are some spring-time planetaries. Here is my Jones-Emberson 1 in Ha, I think it's still around for a few hours each night: ...
Michael Hernandez
darkfire_obs...
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2007
7:10 pm
993
I shot some frames of the owl nebula two nights ago in narrowband 16" LX200R Fork Mount, STL-6303, Astrodon Narrowband Filter, externally guided 80 min each...
Michael Downing
astroden2003
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2007
7:12 pm
994
Here's a link to a chart of some springtime planetaries: http://www.blackskies.org/seasonbst2.html Kl_22, Abell36, and of course, the Owl, look like...
Michael Hernandez
darkfire_obs...
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2007
10:07 pm
995
Terry over on the SBIG group suggested I try a different Palette for my narrowband image and it did produce a more traditional looking narrowband image Seen...
Michael Downing
astroden2003
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2007
11:24 pm
996
Thanks Michael. That's a nice list of PNs. And what a fantastic image of Jones-Emberson 1. Derek ... Here ... nebulae. My ... with ... ...
Derek
dwinzledone
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2007
11:47 pm
997
Both look great. I prefer the CFHT version. APOD time! ... http://www.astroden.com/stl6303/lx200r/Owl_Nebula_CFHT.jpg ... ...
Neil Fleming
neilfleming
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2007
1:50 am
998
Looks good, Michael. I was getting desperate. ... http://www.darkfireastro.com/images/JonesEmberson1_Ha.html ... www.flemingastrophotography.com Direct from...
Neil Fleming
neilfleming
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2007
1:54 am
999
Yes, I've resorted to, gulp, galaxies. But, around 3-4am some narrowband targets are starting to come up. Phil ... [Non-text portions of this message have been...
Philip Good
philipgood
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2007
2:03 am
1000
Very nice, Dean! ... www.flemingastrophotography.com Direct from Boston - brilliant diamonds in pea soup...
Neil Fleming
neilfleming
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2007
7:36 pm
1001
What a grand perspective. Nicely done, Kevin. Don Goldman www.astrodon.com ... utilizing an SBIG ST8-XME equipped with a Nikon 180mm lens and an...
Don Goldman
donclearview
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2007
3:54 pm
1002
Dean, this is faint! Your brought it out nicely and still kept it subtle. Don Goldman www.astrodon.com ... combine. ... the...
Don Goldman
donclearview
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2007
3:55 pm
1003
I'm glad I waited to comment. Either version is terrific, but this version does show the structural differences better. Good work, Michael. Don Goldman ...
Don Goldman
donclearview
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2007
3:56 pm
1004
Thanks so much Don. Clear skies, Kevin ... From: "Don Goldman" <donclearview@...> What a grand perspective. Nicely done, Kevin. Don Goldman ...
ksbtk@...
starmaster08083
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2007
5:31 pm
1005
Hello All! I am off this week, and that is when the weather decides to go sour. I haven't been out with my scope for about 5 days. However, I am still imaging....
stevenorlando
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2007
3:19 am
1006
Hi, can someone help about where to find a procedure to create a Hubble palette image with just Ha and OIII images? I think this procedure could be placed in...
frodil620206
Online Now Send Email
Apr 6, 2007
8:48 pm
1007
That will be a tough job, Florencio. The Hubble palette uses Ha for the Green channel - the channel normally synthesized by most folks when supplied with only...
Neil Fleming
neilfleming
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2007
11:22 pm
1008
Hi Everyone! I am looking at new cameras and would like to see some relatively short halpha exposures (approximately 5 hours)from someone who is using an STL...
astroimage2002
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2007
7:07 pm
1009
My total exposures are usually longer than that, but here are a few with the FSQ and 6303 chip, Brian: http://www.flemingastrophotography.com/nebulae.html ... ...
Neil Fleming
neilfleming
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2007
7:46 pm
1010
Neil, Thank you for the link. When you went from an ST-2000 to the STL-6303 did you notice a lose in detail because of the larger pixel size? Did you do any...
astroimage2002
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2007
8:44 pm
1011
There is a slight increase in undersampling...I believe something like 2.88asp to 3.51asp. Hard to really SEE the difference, though. The big difference is in...
Neil Fleming
neilfleming
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2007
9:35 pm
1012
Neil, Quick clarification: the 16803 chips have 9-micron pixels as well. You might be referring to the 16000M chip, which is the one with 7.4 micron pixels....
eja24601
Offline Send Email
Apr 8, 2007
2:30 am
1013
Hi Brian, you are right, the pixels of the 11000 are a bit too large for a widefield refractor like the FSQ. But I am really impressed what nice details this...
Daniel Marquardt
cirrusnebula
Offline Send Email
Apr 8, 2007
10:26 am
1014
Hi Daniel, I love the field of view! Did you "downsize" the image before you posted it? Brian ... nice ... it ... system....
astroimage2002
Offline Send Email
Apr 8, 2007
2:32 pm
1015
ALL the cameras have pixels too big for our FSQs <g>. Even the outstanding ST-10 results in 2.64 asp. That works fine if you have seeing in the range of 8.7...
Neil Fleming
neilfleming
Offline Send Email
Apr 8, 2007
5:41 pm
1016
Hello All! Happy Easter to All!!! I got a chance to image one of my favorite southern targets, NGC 2070, The Tarantula Nebula. It is an HaRGB, but the Ha image...
stevenorlando
Offline Send Email
Apr 8, 2007
10:55 pm
Messages 987 - 1016 of 5944   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help