Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
astrofaces · Astrofaces Research (www.astrofaces.com)
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
great rightbrain site!   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #17 of 117 |
Re: [astrofaces] great rightbrain site!

Hello Mark,

Thanks for your kind words. It's always nice to get mail from people who enjoy
the project.

The planets periods was phrased that way because, when asked, most people say
that the outer planets spend more time in a sign. It's just a simple
misconception, so we phrased the question in that way. When people think about
it for a while, they understand that the planets move just as you pointed out.
That isn't a research effort, just an observation that the planets periods seem
quite exactly equal . This may have implications on finding the positions of
quantum particles. It may be that the equality only appears when measured in
the astrological signs, these may be the seams of the shape of time.

All the best,
Moshe for the Astrofaces project





mshulgasser <mshulgas@...> wrote: hi friends -
Love the Faces project and hope to contribute.
but I'm confused about the question of the planets timein a sign. You begin:
*****
*****
****Which planet spends the most time in any sign? If we look at any
single period of time, it would seem to be the furthest planet from
the sun.
*****
*****

Each planet necessarily spends one twelfth ( 1 / 12 ) or 8.25% of its time in
each sign. Planets farther from the sun will move more slowly and take many
human years to exhibit this regularity. Fast moving Planets without
retrogradation show it directly (ie the sun and moon). A lifetime is relatively
short. A generation even shorter.
Maybe a kind of higher octave resonances of Jupiter/Saturn/Uranus could
exhibit itself in relation to your question. Maybe something like this
generates the transplutonian planets of Witte's Hamburg School. As it stands I
find your research question meaningless, if not unclear. (Assuming a universe
for practical purposes eternal.)

But Ilove the Faces project because it is so totally right-brained, which
astrology is basically -- a right brain activity with pseudoleft brain aspects.

The Time in Sign project is too left brained for you. Don't waste your energy
on it (forgive me for unasked for advise from a pushy leo)You seemto have the
talent and fortitude to use the internet to develop a very vital project.

Bravo, whoever you are. I look forward to reading your site more closely
soon.. and send you some pictures
Mark Shulgasser





---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "astrofaces" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
astrofaces-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------






---------------------------------
Yahoo! Photos
Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays,
whatever.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Sun Jan 1, 2006 1:20 pm

mosheberlin
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #17 of 117 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

hi friends - Love the Faces project and hope to contribute. but I'm confused about the question of the planets time in a sign. You begin: ***** ***** ****Which...
mshulgasser
Offline Send Email
Dec 31, 2005
6:00 pm

Hello Mark, Thanks for your kind words. It's always nice to get mail from people who enjoy the project. The planets periods was phrased that way because, when...
Moshe Berlin
mosheberlin
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2006
1:20 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help