Hi, Jasonfan.
Sadly this list is virtually inactive so far, but I agree that it is a
fascinating subject and that physical and expression simmilarities are
found among people that share important positions in the natal chart. I
was surprised when I realized in a portrait of M. Thatcher (an ugly
woman) how much she resembles my mother (a rather beautiful woman): I
checked their charts an voilá: they share 2 major placements: Asc. and
Sun/Moon (my Mom's Moon is right o Thatcher's Libra Sun).
I could continue like that for centuries. In fact what most made me
believe that Astrology is actually meaningful in my times of doubts was
the shocking conncetion Solar sign - appearence that is not universal
but sufficiently visible to persuade me. At least in my family Taureans
are stocky, Gemini are small rather slim and Aquareans are elongated and
bony... of course it's not so simple but the obvioustendencies helped me
to develope interest in Astrology.
I do think that the three traits mentioned are very relevant but that
aspects to them, specially Asc. are also very relevant. For instance you
gent quite Plutonian looks (inverted V eyebrows, for instance) among
people whose Asc. is conj. or aspected by Pluto. A good excercise is
maybe to compare one chart with a series of photos of which only one is
right... playing this game, I've realized that aspects to the Asc are
most important determining appearence, something that is not reflected
in the Astrofaces series.
Btw, I'm the (only) Leo-Can-Ari guy (though that pic is rather old).
Enjoy,
Luis.
astrofaces@yahoogroups.com escribió:
> Astrofaces Research (www.astrofaces.com)
>
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJlcTZ0cXU3BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzEzNTkwMj\
M3BGdycHNwSWQDMTYwMDA4MjY3MgRzZWMDaGRyBHNsawNocGgEc3RpbWUDMTE0OTYwNDIxNQ--;_ylg=\
1/SIG=11d05m41u/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/group/astrofaces>
>
>
>
> Messages In This Digest (1 Message)
>
> 1.
> Re: further research <#1> From: jasonfan2003
>
> View All Topics
>
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJnNm4zNnVzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzEzNTkwMj\
M3BGdycHNwSWQDMTYwMDA4MjY3MgRzZWMDZG1zZwRzbGsDYXRwYwRzdGltZQMxMTQ5NjA0MjE1;_ylg=\
1/SIG=12c4o0gat/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/group/astrofaces/messages%3fxm=1%26m\
=p%26tidx=1>
> | Create New Topic
>
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJncHZmbXVoBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzEzNTkwMj\
M3BGdycHNwSWQDMTYwMDA4MjY3MgRzZWMDZG1zZwRzbGsDbnRwYwRzdGltZQMxMTQ5NjA0MjE1;_ylg=\
1/SIG=11i5i4fid/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/group/astrofaces/post>
>
>
>
> Message
>
> 1.
>
>
> Re: further research
>
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJwaGl2ZXFsBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzEzNTkwMj\
M3BGdycHNwSWQDMTYwMDA4MjY3MgRtc2dJZAMzMARzZWMDZG1zZwRzbGsDdm1zZwRzdGltZQMxMTQ5Nj\
A0MjE1;_ylg=1/SIG=11oe1g09b/**http%3a//groups.yahoo.com/group/astrofaces/message\
/30>
>
>
>
> Posted by: "jasonfan2003" jasonfan2003@...
>
<mailto:jasonfan2003@...?Subject=%20Re:%20further%20research>
> jasonfan2003 <http://profiles.yahoo.com/jasonfan2003>
>
>
> Tue Jun 6, 2006 12:28 am (PST)
>
> Very impressive web site! I really want to discuss with you about
> this whole project.
>
> Throughout the years, I've been doing researches on astrology
> myself. One of the most interesting topic is how the natal chart can
> reflect our appearances. What I want to say for the moment is that
> the way to find this out would not be as simple as your assumptions,
> i.e. Sun Sign + Moon Sign + Ascendant Sign.
>
> There're couple of astrologers putting efforts on similar researchs
> like your in human history. One of the best books on this topic
> is "Astrological body types" written by Judith Hill. Although the
> book has given a lot of valuable information on this topic, none of
> them can be repeatedly duplicated in real life cases. You results
> will probably come out like hers. 3 or 4 of 10 cases are strangely
> outstanding. The rest 6 or 7 cases does not work. I believe the
> method used (such as Sun Sign + Moon Sign + Ascendant Sign) is not
> correct or too simple.
>
> Until I was able to buy the out-of-print book "Recent Advances in
> Astrology" by Geoffrey Dean, I have some idea how should the method
> to be applied. The book has mentioned about the successful works of
> Edith Wangemann. But, I'm very disappointed that the information is
> not detail enough. The only thing I know is that there are some co-
> relations found between the cusps of Koch House system and Human
> faces. The problem is that I can read German and I would not be able
> to reach further information about Edith Wangemann's work.
>
> Althought she has just passed away, I was wonder if you will be able
> to find the further information of her works.
>
> Regards,
> Jason Fan (From Hong Kong)
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]