Luis,

I think you have confused the cases yourself. First,
you mother's birthtime is uncertain or around an hour.
Thus, her chart should not be compared with Thatcher's
chart for finding out a valid scheme on astroface
project. Otherwise, you'll not be able to clarify what
factors causing what features. And, you will
complicate the cases yourself like what I've done 10
years ago.

Secondly, you should not start your research based on
inaccurate data. I suggest you to buy a CD from
astrodatabank instead. That's a good place to start
with. Professional astrologers usually do their
research on this system.

I guess you're not professional astrologer either. I
would suggest this web site to get more research
documents from official astrological institutes like
AFA, AA and Faculties of Astrological studies, etc.
Otherwise, it will finally end up like a discussion
around amateur's gossip. There's no harm of doing this
but the project will not be end in success.

Cheers,
Jason




--- luis_aldamiz <lialdamiz@...> »¡¡G

> I said in previous mail that they share Scorpio Asc.
> apparently - yet
> the birthtime of my mother is uncertain for an hour
> or so... I had it
> corrected to that position of Scorpio on my own
> amateur logic but it
> could be even Saggitarius actually. All I know is
> that, assuming that
> my homy correction is ok, they seem could be conj.
> by a reasonable
> orb, same as Moon-Sun which must be conj. by 6?
>
> Not a very close connection maybe but enough to make
> two people
> resemble at some age and in some specific portraits.
>
> My mother's Asc does not have the heavy presence of
> Saturn that
> definitively conditions a lot Mrs. Thatcher's aspect
> (Sat is conj. to
> her Asc. less than 2?. My Mother's Asc. (if
> correct) seems strangely
> unaspected instead.
>
> Note: let it be. The more I think about it, the more
> I'm prone to give
> my mother a Sagg. rising. Scorpio Ascs. are so
> marked!
>
> Another case of my own experience is a person, whose
> young pics
> resembled the Swedish series charachter Pippi
> Langstrum (an actress
> called Nilsson). Checking the BD of the actress and
> my acquintance's
> chart it happened that this latters' Asc is conj. by
> less than 1?to
> Nilsson's (Pippi's) Sun.
>
> There's a crossed connection: it's not just "Sun
> defines this, Moon
> defines that, etc." Moon and Sun or Sun and Asc,
> when in the same
> area, may give two people some simmilar appearence,
> at least in some
> period of life or specific expression.
>
> But people definitively resemble by those
> conjunctions. I have enough
> in-family connections of that type: Taurus father
> and son born just
> one day apart with Moons in trine in earth signs,
> for instance.
>
> Even Moon signs can be felt but I think the Moon is
> less obvious than
> Sun+Asc in the appearence.
>
> Luis.
>
> --- In astrofaces@yahoogroups.com, Jason Fan
> <jasonfan2003@...> wrote:
> >
> > Lius,
> >
> > Thank you for you message.
> >
> > Have you ever checked with the hard aspects of
> > Thatcher's Asc and your mom's Asc? How similar
> they
> > are?
> >
> > I believe...if you tell me there're no hard
> aspects on
> > Asc of your mom, that will make a great
> differences.
> > Now, I'd like to tell you that the bony face
> features
> > of Thatcher should be explained by the
> conjunctions of
> > her Asc with Saturn. I don't know whether the same
> > happened to your mom's natal chart.
> > This aspect can override the influences of the
> > combination of Sun sign + Moon Sign + Rising Sign.
> > Please refers to my latest message posted on
> > astroface.com for detail.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jason
>
>
>
>
>


_______________________________________
YM - Â÷½u°T®§

´Nºâ§A¨S¦³¤Wºô¡A§AªºªB¤Í¤´¥i¥H¯d¤U°T®§µ¹§A¡A·í§A¤Wºô®É´N¯à¥ß§Y¬Ý¨ì¡A¥ô¦ó»¡¸Ü³£ÉN\
¨«¥¢¡C
http://messenger.yahoo.com.hk