I updated RL002 as suggested in our Germantown meeting with inclusion of a NAT-Unicast BVLL and wording changes to J.7. See you in Quebec City. Roland Laird ...
So in going through my notes from Germantown, the direction on the NAT was to incorporate a BVLL into the RL-002 proposal because there were situations from a...
Dear IP-WG: At our meeting in Germantown it was briefly mentioned that you could not have two FD's behind a NAT router - for example in a hotel. I don't...
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.dcom.xdsl/browse_thread/thread/e881c5df56aac338/775e1a7e86410edb?lnk=st&q=BFSR41+NAT&rnum=3&hl=en#775e1a7e86410edb This is...
The Google URL is: http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&hl=en&q=BFSR41+NAT&btnG=Google+Search If URL above is...
I just want to re-iterate that with the addition of a "NAT-Unicast" message with the same format at the "Forwarded-NPDU", RL-002 becomes extremely robust...
In the NAT discussion, we've touched on the topic of whether or not I-Am's should be globally broadcast, locally broadcast, or unicast. I have a task before me...
Dear IP-WG Attached is RL-002-4. I've modified a bit of wording throughout and have added points 4 and 8 from RL-002-DM-1 to the NAT configuration items. ...
Bill, RL-001-4 is the latest revision of the IP Functionality Tests. This proposal was voted to be submitted to the SSPC by the IP-WG in Chicago. Please add it...
I have found out how to implement RL-002 in such a way that it does not have the varying B/IP address problem, AND it also does not have some of the foreign...
I want to retract proposal DCM-003 for two reasons: 1) Nobody responded to it 2) It has a nit-picky problem WRT foreign devices. I need to be able to support...
Dear IP-WG: I spent a couple of hours on this sunny Saturday looking into the complications caused to B/IP by dynamic NAT and PAT. Here are the conclusions I...
Dear BACnet/IP Working Group Members: I'd like to share with the group the email exchange I had with Dean Matsen which raises the problems caused by Port...
I only received one correction to the minutes sent out earlier. This corrected version includes the suggestion to remove the PTP port from the Network Port...
All, I was pondering this question last night and I started putting some pieces together that I thought I would share. Here are my pieces: 1) DHCP would...
Here is an updated version of SGD-004 with some additional use cases and resolving some issues that those brought up. I realize that we don't have a lot of...
Dear IP-WG BACneteers, I had this very informative email exchange with Buddy last week and want to share it with the group. It raises the issues of Dynamic NAT...
Attached are the minutes from the IP-WG meeting in Chicago as well as corrected Norfolk minutes. Comments and corrections are welcome. Roland Laird <<Minutes...
Dear BACnet/IP working group, At our recent meeting in Norfolk, I was tasked with fixing test 14.6.3 and related issues in Annex J of the BACnet standard. See...
The attached documents are the minutes from the Norfolk meeting. For those that attended please let me know of any corrections needed. Thanks, Roland Laird ...
At the meeting last week in Norfolk, the BACnet/IP working group discussed JB-016-1, a document that outlines some usage scenarios and requirements for a new...
Hi all, Attached is a document we will review in Norfolk next week. <<RL-001-1.doc>> Roland Laird VP, Research & Development Reliable Controls Corporation...
