Cliff et al. I added this transition in the latest draft of Add-135-2010an, which I have just uploaded. -K-...
109
bacnet-mstpwg@yahoogr...
May 15, 2012 2:50 pm
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the bacnet-mstpwg group. File :...
108
cliffcopass
Apr 24, 2012 3:29 pm
One of our people pointed out that the Idle state (clause 9.5.6.2) transition "BroadcastDataNeedingReply" added by addendum 135-2004 b part 9 was not added to...
107
Clifford.H.Copass@...
cliffcopass
Dec 15, 2011 2:09 pm
I believe that auto baud rate on MS/TP (or IP) is considered to be a local matter, much like off-line detection. Tests need to allow for it since it is...
106
Coleman Brumley
cbrumley
Dec 15, 2011 2:06 pm
Giri, The auto-baud algorithm used in a device is left entirely up to the vendor. Regards, Coleman From: bacnet-mstpwg@yahoogroups.com...
105
girig123
Dec 15, 2011 3:29 am
hi from the BTL test casses i found that test casses accomodate devices that can do auto baud rate, but BAcnet 135-2010 standard doesn't mention any details...
104
Kerry Lynn
kerlyn2001
Oct 11, 2011 3:55 am
Greetings, Just a reminder that the advisory public review period on Addendum an (MS/TP Extended Frames) ends next week. The proposal can be found at...
103
Kerry Lynn
kerlyn2001
Jul 6, 2011 11:45 pm
Greetings, The Internet Draft for the "IPv6 over MS/TP" has been uploaded to the IETF and is available at: ...
102
bacnet-mstpwg@yahoogr...
Jun 26, 2011 8:13 pm
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the bacnet-mstpwg group. File :...
101
bacnet-mstpwg@yahoogr...
Jun 24, 2011 5:44 pm
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the bacnet-mstpwg group. File :...
100
bacnet-mstpwg@yahoogr...
Jun 23, 2011 2:43 am
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the bacnet-mstpwg group. File :...
99
Clifford.H.Copass@...
cliffcopass
Jun 16, 2011 4:14 pm
I think the main difference is the 135-2008ad, part 8 proposal would work with existing routers and has no known conflicts with existing devices that would not...
98
Kerry Lynn
kerlyn2001
Jun 16, 2011 4:05 pm
Cliff, Is there a need in practice to send datagrams larger than 1497 octets over MS/TP? I ask because there *is* a proposal in the pipeline for sending large...
97
cliffcopass
Jun 16, 2011 3:33 pm
After the first public review of 135-2008ad, part 8 was removed due to a single comment suggesting that an alternate mechanism could be used to accomplish the...
96
bacnet-mstpwg@yahoogr...
Jun 11, 2011 2:42 pm
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the bacnet-mstpwg group. File :...
95
bacnet-mstpwg@yahoogr...
Jun 11, 2011 2:40 pm
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the bacnet-mstpwg group. File :...
94
bacnet-mstpwg@yahoogr...
May 3, 2011 7:29 am
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the bacnet-mstpwg group. File :...
93
Kerry Lynn
kerlyn2001
May 2, 2011 4:38 pm
Actually, it's attached, but I'll move it up to the yahoo group when I arrive in SF. This document explains the need for a larger (32-bit) data CRC with large...
92
bacnet-mstpwg@yahoogr...
May 2, 2011 4:18 pm
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the bacnet-mstpwg group. File :...
91
David Fisher
polars15213
Feb 17, 2011 3:55 pm
Kerry, ... When I revise this doc we'll include clarifying language about that ... frames is ... I don't think that the upper layer should know or need to know...
90
kerlyn2001
Feb 16, 2011 10:57 pm
Sorry for the delayed response. I think there are two issues (but I'd like to get other opinions). The first is that Clause 9 seems to be contradictory in...
89
Clifford.H.Copass@...
cliffcopass
Feb 11, 2011 3:37 pm
Actually I don't think this issue has anything at all to do with the physical location/connector on the board necessarily. If a client device is trying to...
88
Coleman Brumley
cbrumley
Feb 11, 2011 3:04 pm
Cliff, I've been mulling this over since we talked about it in Vegas. How would you be able to make a logical connection/relationship from the NPO on the wire...
87
Clifford.H.Copass@...
cliffcopass
Feb 11, 2011 2:15 pm
I think this is yet another reason why the Network Port Object proposal needs a way to find the Network Port Object for the port you are communicating through...
86
carlneilson
Feb 10, 2011 11:43 pm
Note that broadcasts are already an issue that developers need to consider as there is no guarantee that devices are capable of receiving the maximum frame ...
85
David Fisher
polars15213
Feb 10, 2011 1:44 pm
Kerry, If and when we reach some agreement about the concept of a large frame type, which is the MSTP-WG purview, then we can make additional consideration and...
84
Coleman Brumley
cbrumley
Feb 10, 2011 5:41 am
Old devices would simply drop the broadcasted large frames. From: bacnet-mstpwg@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bacnet-mstpwg@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of kerlyn2001 ...
83
kerlyn2001
Feb 10, 2011 1:59 am
What about broadcasts on segments that contain both old and new devices? Do you agree that old devices should reject large broadcast frames, or should we...
82
kerlyn2001
Feb 10, 2011 1:57 am
The service primitives DL-UNITDATA.request and DL-UNITDATA.indication are described in clause 9.1.1 and 9.1.2, respectively. These are based on the ISO 8802-2...
81
carlneilson
Feb 10, 2011 1:29 am
1 - I think that the only appropriate methods for determining large versus small would be via the Max_APDU_Length_Accepted property in the device or the...
