Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
bigdob · Big dobsonian telescope users.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 17508 - 17537 of 19601   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
17508
I have a 24" f/3.3 For me the coma is not a problem at all with the paracorr. Maybe I'm not very sensitive to it ? ;-) Collimation is sensitive but not...
Raphaël GUINAMARD
rguinamard
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2007
4:59 pm
17509
Thanks for all your replies. I decided to take the leap and signed up with a great optician to make a mirror. Last night I received the latest issue of ATT...
j_kammlade
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2007
9:12 pm
17510
Hello to all! My name is Mike, and I just found this new group and joined up! I uploaded one photo of my 20" f/3.6 to get things going. While not 100% a "Dob"...
Mike Linnolt
startestisbest
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
3:58 am
17511
Care to post a pic? <g> ... www.flemingastrophotography.com Direct from Boston - brilliant diamonds in pea soup...
Neil Fleming
neilfleming
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
4:00 am
17512
This has been bothering me for awhile and I can't find an answer... While doing some naked eye star gazing one night last winter, I noticed that Regulus was...
tsulmer1
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
3:03 pm
17513
Almost always, stars will twinkle and planets will not. The simplest reason is because stars are pinpoint light sources, where planets (and satellites) are...
Scott Kranz
stripe1966
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
3:19 pm
17514
Oh, I was going to add that there have been nights with EXTREMELY TERRIBLE seeing that I've seen planets not so much twinkle, but instead jiggle around a...
Scott Kranz
stripe1966
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
3:23 pm
17515
Tim, What you observed is because planets and satilites have "size" and stars are one dimential objects. Generaly stars have no size and are only single points...
mforeman@...
mikeforeman42
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
3:32 pm
17516
Thanks for the responses. That is the explanation I've always heard too. And in telescopes, stars are definately point sources with no resolvable disc...
tsulmer1
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
3:43 pm
17517
Even if the eye can't resolve them, the planets do have diameter - they don't have a single source point - whereas stars are single points. Bob Bunge...
Bob Bunge
bungerob
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
4:03 pm
17518
OK. So, how far out does an object have to be to be considered a point source vs. extended object. Stars are also extended objects with diameter - our sun is...
tsulmer1
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
4:10 pm
17519
This seems to beg the point. Stars obviously have much larger diameters than planets. I suppose given the distances they subtend an angle of effectively zero. ...
Stephen Truitt
stephmac20016
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
4:57 pm
17520
To be clear, I should have said diameters in arc seconds. I don't know know of any stars other than the Sun that has a measurable diameter as seen from a...
Bob Bunge
bungerob
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
5:12 pm
17521
This is probably all academic, but would asteroids twinkle. Or is the combination of their size and distance enough to render them a point source? ... know ...
tsulmer1
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
5:18 pm
17522
I suppose it would matter on how big and how far away they are. It would all depend on the seeing as well. Planets can twinkle too if it's bad enough. There...
Scott Kranz
stripe1966
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
6:47 pm
17523
Planets are large enough to be larger than points of light. Therefore the atmosphere doesn't tend to blur them (twinkle) as much as a point source. The best...
Jack Estes
jackestes
Offline Send Email
Oct 6, 2007
3:15 am
17524
Yes this has been know for centuries at least since the days of Tycho Brahe, who did not use telescopes to observe. ... From: "Jack Estes" To:...
william rowland
Ludwigvan_Be...
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2007
3:11 am
17525
Thanks for all the responses. So, the concensus is that planets don't twinkle because they are close enough (and thus big enough) that there are enough light...
tsulmer1
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2007
4:02 am
17526
Hi, Does anyone have a spreadsheet listing all NGC objects along with their magnitude, angular size, and type of object? I've found several resources on the...
tsulmer1
Offline Send Email
Oct 8, 2007
5:35 pm
17527
Gottlieb's NGC/IC website is probably the best and most accurate and up-to-date http://www.ngcic.org/ Mike...
Mike Linnolt
startestisbest
Offline Send Email
Oct 8, 2007
10:02 pm
17528
Take a look at the revised NGC list I just down loaded to the files section. Hope it has what you want. No folder. Bill Friebus...
Bill Friebus
pwpanther
Offline Send Email
Oct 8, 2007
11:40 pm
17529
If you have SkyTools software, you can download one. I have it on my computer. Jack Estes Cell phone 512-657-9062 Home phone 512-418-1790 Austin, TX 78759 ...
Jack Estes
jackestes
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2007
12:01 am
17530
Is Sky Tools updated with info from the NGC/IC site? If not, going directly to http://www.ngcic.org/public_HCNGC/HCNGC.htm and downloading the spreadsheet is...
pensack1
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2007
3:57 am
17531
I would highly recommend the Saguaro Astronomy Club's database (version 7.7). http://www.saguaroastro.org/content/downloads.htm [Non-text portions of this...
Peter Argenziano
pargenz
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2007
2:21 pm
17532
Thanks to everyone who replied. I now have 3 very good NGC lists on spreadsheets - each is very good. Thanks again! P.S. Why is there no magnitude data on...
tsulmer1
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2007
9:13 pm
17533
Thanks to everyone. I've downloaded the 3 lists suggested and now have 3 very good NGC spreadsheet lists. Thanks! P.S. Why is there no magnitude data on...
tsulmer1
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2007
9:15 pm
17534
Argo Navis has kazillions of Washington double stars but I'll tell you if you look at 'em you're not going to find a whole lot of interest, near as I can see....
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2007
9:25 pm
17535
Tim, If you're interested, I (in fact a macro that is not anymore in the file) have also added the chart number for each object for Sky atlas 2000, urano...
Raphaël GUINAMARD
rguinamard
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2007
10:05 pm
17536
Raphael, Thanks muchly! I've very much appreciate a copy of your file. You can email it to me at starenergy@.... Thank you so much! Tim ... file) have...
tsulmer1
Offline Send Email
Oct 10, 2007
4:48 am
17537
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the bigdob group. File :...
bigdob@yahoogroups.com
Send Email
Oct 10, 2007
1:06 pm
Messages 17508 - 17537 of 19601   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help