Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
bigdob · Big dobsonian telescope users.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 5282 - 5311 of 19605   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
5282
Thanks for your input everyone, I think I'm beginning to see where I have to go on this. Happy New Year! - Craig...
Craig Levine <clevine...
clevinecan
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
1:26 pm
5283
... time ... Glenn, This is part of an article I am writting for Amateur Astronomy hope this helps. Michael The size of your clear aperture is determined by a...
starstructure02 <zamb...
starstructure02
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
2:43 pm
5284
Hi, Where did the 57.3 value come from? Thanks, Peter ... From: mailto:starstructure02 <zambianco@... To: bigdob@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday,...
Peter
maxima00ca
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
3:32 pm
5285
1 radian = 57.3 degrees. For small angles (measured in radians), the Sine or Tan of that angle equals approximately the value of the angle. 0.1 radians equals...
karpftj@...
karpftj
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
3:41 pm
5286
Hi. I'm planning to have a truss scope built using either of the above mirrors from Discovery. I like the f/4.1 because it is more compact (I'm not a big guy...
dopderbeck <dopderbec...
dopderbeck
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
3:52 pm
5287
the main thing I would look at is the central obstruction.views can be noticably improved if you can keep it at or below 20 percent. of course ...
john kagey
john_the_tel...
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
4:10 pm
5288
I personally would not go with anything less than 4.5 and recently bought my Obsession 20 over the 18 because it was an f5 and not an f4.5. Collimation gets to...
Gary Myers <GMYERS2@....
garyk9rx
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
5:53 pm
5289
... angle equals ... about ... radians makes ... doing your ... That pretty much answers that question Thanks Michael...
starstructure02 <zamb...
starstructure02
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
6:14 pm
5290
... <zambianco@n...> wrote: It is a week now since you posted and you still haven't gotten any answers, so we would like to hear what you think. MY guess would...
g2baraff <g2baraff@...>
g2baraff
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
7:15 pm
5291
Hi, As you probably suspected, the f/5 will be much easier to collimate than the f/4.1. I forget the numbers (look for Nils Olaf Carlin's web site on...
steve_of_ar <steve_of...
steve_of_ar
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
7:15 pm
5292
<<<Hi, As you probably suspected, the f/5 will be much easier to collimate than the f/4.1.>>> I hear a lot of people say that but that is not really true. ive...
john kagey
john_the_tel...
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
7:40 pm
5293
Hi "dopderbeck <dopderbeck@...>" I've got a 17.5" f5, while a buddy of mine has an (older) f4.1 Discovery mirror in his home built dob. I can give...
Robert Leyland
r_leyland
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
8:07 pm
5294
... Gene Baraff First I need to make it clear that I am NOT trashing Niles idea. If fact I think it's a good idea for those that can't get the grasp of the...
starstructure02 <zamb...
starstructure02
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
9:25 pm
5295
... ratios) then I think that's the point though, the tolerances double between f/4 and f/5, with f/5 a single pass of collimation is probably good enough, ...
steve_of_ar <steve_of...
steve_of_ar
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2003
11:54 pm
5296
I was speaking from my experences more then anything else. the 10" F3.95 I built with swayzie optics. when I use the tectron tools the collimation comes out...
john kagey
john_the_tel...
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
3:02 am
5297
... I have directly compared the collimation of my Obsession 15" via the Barlowed Laser (after Tectron sight tube centering of the 2dary and placement of the...
Stephen M. Truitt
stephmac20016
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
3:32 am
5298
I find it interesting that folks seem to be comparing the differences between the many different methods and devices, but no one has done the most important...
Bob Bunge
bungerob
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
3:55 am
5299
... differences ... the ... test ... To be very honest, I live in central Florida and in the five years I've been in this hobby (last 3 I have a pretty good...
starstructure02 <zamb...
starstructure02
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
4:11 am
5300
... the ... Was the Barlow and laser you used also 2"? And where can I get a Catseye Chesire. Michael...
starstructure02 <zamb...
starstructure02
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
4:17 am
5301
... From: <zambianco@...> To: <bigdob@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 10:17 PM Subject: [bigdob] Re: The Barlowed Laser ... ...
Jim & Pat Fly
jafly1
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
4:25 am
5302
... From: "Bob Bunge" <bbunge@...> To: <bigdob@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 9:54 PM Subject: Re: [bigdob] Re: The Barlowed...
William Byrd
web0178213
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
5:04 am
5303
All, If you have clear skies, check out Saturn and the Crab Neb. Looks real cool!! So pretty with my 15" with the 17MM Nag. Bob Z. Tucson, AZ...
tucson1955 <zawadab@....
tucson1955
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
5:37 am
5304
You may have to have this made by a machine shop. Take your scope preferably to someone who owns a machine shop and is into astronomy and it will make it...
william rowland
Ludwigvan_Be...
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
7:51 am
5305
Michael, Bob Bunge makes a good point that there's not much value to increased collimation accuracy beyond what makes a discernable difference at the eyepiece....
Frank Bov
frankbov
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
12:09 pm
5306
... Since there is no difference in the collimation "picture" yielded by the BL and the Catseye Cheshire, I do not see how to answer your question. Steve...
Stephen Truitt
stephmac20016
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
5:08 pm
5307
Barlow was TV 2x, 1.25", laser also 1.25"...
Stephen Truitt
stephmac20016
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
5:17 pm
5308
... Hi, I'm recently back from traveling, and haven't been able to comment before. If the cheshire's peephole is centered in the focuser, and the Barlow is not...
nilsolofcarlin <nilso...
nilsolofcarlin
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
9:01 pm
5309
Attn: big dob users/owners: My local astronomy club is working on acquiring a 30" class Dob for the club's use. At a meeting of the task force recently, we...
drclarkjr <drclarkjr@...
drclarkjr
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
10:21 pm
5310
... I guess you have a case of confusion over secondary offset. No matter what you do, something will be offset, but you have the choice of what. Do you refer...
Nils Olof Carlin
nilsolofcarlin
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
11:06 pm
5311
... <nilsolof.carlin@t...> wrote: Hi Nils Olof, and everyone who replied - I sicerely appreciate your great responses! A fellow club member has a 12.5" dob,...
Craig Levine <clevine...
clevinecan
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2003
12:26 am
Messages 5282 - 5311 of 19605   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help