Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
bigdob · Big dobsonian telescope users.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 5845 - 5874 of 18770   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
5845
His website says that he is still taking orders for the small and large chairs. He is not accepting orders for finished chairs, just unfinished. I've had one...
Ken Coates
kennethecoates
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2003
12:28 am
5846
I have just ordered a 15"F5 PDHQ from discovery. Discovery - I think - places the secondary aprox 62.5" from the face of the primary. My question now is on the...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 4, 2003
1:02 pm
5847
... I had a 17.5 inch dob that was optically excellent. Changing the secondary mirror to 3.1 inch from 3.5 inch clearly produced better sharpness on star...
William Blakeslee
williebluestar
Offline Send Email
Apr 4, 2003
7:08 pm
5848
The 15" f/4.5 Obsession, and the 14.5" f/4.3 Starmaster both use a 2.6" secondary mirror. I just got a 2.6" secondary for my 14" f/4.5 PDHQ (it has a 3.1"). I...
m51john
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
12:07 am
5849
... use ... f/4.5 ... John: Let me know how this works out. I also would like to know how you like the optics. I just ordered the 15"pdhq. I haved moved into...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
3:19 am
5850
I have just ordered a 15" F5 PDHQ from discovery. In trying to decide on a 2.6 vs 3.1" minor axis secondary, I am struck by the fact that while discovery uses...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
3:39 am
5851
Isn't the minimum height of the focuser also a factor? Don Clement Running Springs, California http:www.clementfocuser.com ... fact ... size...
Donald Clement
donald_clement
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
2:18 pm
5852
... Of course it is, A low profile focuser allows you to get away with an increaesed primary to secondary distance (equivalently, less distance from secondary...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
4:17 pm
5853
... Of course it is, A low profile focuser allows you to get away with an increaesed primary to secondary distance (equivalently, less distance from secondary...
Neil Carroll
zzamia2003
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
4:50 pm
5854
... actually ... f5 ... real ... NEWT. NEWT is a free design software available here. ... http://home.att.net/~dale.keller/atm/newtonians/newtsoft/newtsoft.htm...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
6:29 pm
5855
... I already have the numbers crunched for off axis light fall-off with both a 2.6 and a 3.1", and my numbers concur with both the newt program and Mel...
Neil Carroll
zzamia2003
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
6:57 pm
5856
I do appreciate the mechanical notes you provide, but what I am trying to find out is if the smaller secondary on the Obsession and Starmaster is facilitated ...
Neil Carroll
zzamia2003
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
7:07 pm
5857
... Wow! I must be using very ambiguous language, I guess I should have majored in english instead of physics... Of course you cant do better than 100%. I am...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
8:20 pm
5858
Wow! I must be using very ambiguous language, I guess I should have majored in english instead of physics... If you majored in physics why are you asking?...
Neil Carroll
zzamia2003
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
9:35 pm
5859
Joe, I want to address this line by line also....so here is another post. Lets speak more precisely: Forget for the moment about tubes, low profile focusers,...
Neil Carroll
zzamia2003
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
9:56 pm
5860
... - ... like ... secondaries ... To Big Dob Group: Please excuse any obnoxiousness on my part. I have perhaps been too long-winded, and therefore unclear. ...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
9:56 pm
5861
Neil, I still think we are at cross purposes: In essence I think that you feel that I am oversimplifying. What I am trying to determine,is the comprimise...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
10:32 pm
5862
Neil, I still think we are at cross purposes: In essence I think that you feel that I am oversimplifying. What I am trying to determine,is the comprimise...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
10:33 pm
5863
Joe, The information you have requested regarding Obsession scopes is not commonly known, nor have I seen it published on any web site. Ditto for Starmaster,...
Charlie Starks
cstarsnc
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
10:35 pm
5864
Joe Have you considered just calling the manufacturers and asking them? jtm ... From: "Joe Cannavo" <jpcannavo@...> To: <bigdob@yahoogroups.com> Sent:...
Jim Miller
jtmiller95746
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
10:48 pm
5865
p.s. (I cant resist) saying that primary diameter x f ratio is a "more precise" equality to focal length is kind of (but not exactly) like saying that 5 x 15...
Neil Carroll
zzamia2003
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
11:08 pm
5866
... In-depth questions and quest for answers ... That's what this forum is for ...right? ... Neil, Absolutly! My best bet might be to go with the 3.1 (21%...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2003
11:17 pm
5867
I finally got the answere I needed from an obsession owner at sci.astro.amateur on google. As I suspectd, obsession uses as slightly shorter secondary to focal...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2003
1:23 pm
5868
... With a given newtonian paraboloid, the size of the secondary and the position of its placement along the optical path (i.e. distance from primary), in a...
Nils Olof Carlin
nilsolofcarlin
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2003
2:53 pm
5869
Hi group, I have been developing this Big Dob Finder/Travel scope combination and wanted to get some feed back from the folks who use large sized dobs. I have...
Neil Carroll
zzamia2003
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2003
3:36 pm
5870
... you ... Thanks Nils: the .25" & .8" fields at focal plane agree with the .19 and .six-three (the numbers on this keyboard are messing up!)degree, fully ...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2003
4:54 pm
5871
... you ... Thanks Nils: the .25" & .8" fields at focal plane agree with the .19 and .six-three (the numbers on this keyboard are messing up!)degree, fully ...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2003
4:54 pm
5872
... you ... Thanks Nils: the .25" & .8" fields at focal plane agree with the .19 and .six-three (the numbers on this keyboard are messing up!)degree, fully ...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2003
4:54 pm
5873
The lousy keybord in our library at work somehow triple posted... Yet it cant type numbers...my apologies Joe...
Joe Cannavo
jpcannavo
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2003
4:57 pm
5874
neil what's the name of the folder and is it in the files or photos area? tnx jtm ... From: "Neil Carroll" <ncarz@...> To: <bigdob@yahoogroups.com> ...
Jim Miller
jtmiller95746
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2003
5:37 pm
Messages 5845 - 5874 of 18770   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help