Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
bytesforall_readers · Bytes for All Readers & Supporters Forum
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
National Assembly NA body for transparent cyber laws - Pakistan   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #13640 of 13932 |
http://www.dawnnews.tv/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/sci-tech/1\
6-a-body-for-transparent-cyber-laws-hs-06


ISLAMABAD: The National Assembly Standing Committee on Information
Technology and Telecommu-nications has called for transparency,
stricter laws and thorough investigation to protect users’ data in
‘Prevention of Electronic Crimes Ordinance (PECO) 2008’.

The committee which met here at the National Assembly Secretariat
endorsed the dissent note by Anusha Rehman Khan and Marvi Memon on the
ordinance.

Ms Rehman told the NA body that the PECO in its current form violated
the fundamental rights of the people.

She said the cyber law had wide ranging, unchecked investigatory
powers, search and seizure of personal and corporate data, adding that
it could take years to prove the offence.

She said under the current law search and seizure could take place
anytime and anywhere on any number of IT systems.

The legislator said an accused had no legal guarantees that the
computers taken into custody would not be implanted with false
evidence or the data in computers would not be lost or damaged.

Regarding Article 10, the first provision to the Section 25 of PECO,
she told the body that the government could devise the procedure for
investigation and prosecution of offences under the Cyber Law 2008.

Ms Rehman pointed out that the PECO created fictional category of
additional ‘electronic offences’ that would lead effectively to double
punishment for the same offences like forgery, cheating, causing
damage to an IT system. Thus, a person could be charged both under
relevant sections and under the PECO.

The ordinance also did not provide any protection to the property
rights, she said, adding that no principles for compensations for such
property loss were stated in the law.

Ms Rehman said the sophisticated IT equipment and technical training
programmes were required for investigation agencies. “A law is only
required to cover two to three offences that are not covered elsewhere
e.g. spamming, spoofing,” she added.

--

Regards.
--------------------------
Fouad Bajwa
@skBajwa
Answering all your technology questions
http://www.askbajwa.com
http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa



Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:43 am

fouadbajwa
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #13640 of 13932 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

http://www.dawnnews.tv/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/sci-tech/16-a-body-for-transparent-cyber-laws-hs-06 ISLAMABAD: The National Assembly...
Fouad Bajwa
fouadbajwa
Offline Send Email
Jul 10, 2009
11:44 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help