By default, AMF will only encode the binary equivelent of an XML file. Just for fun, try writing that ObjectProxy out to the hard drive and open it up with a text editor to see for yourself. Flash will try to the flash.net.getClassByAlias method to identify this structure as a native Class. If that method does not return a Class, it will default to using ObjectProxy because it doesn't have any way to make the connection to the VO on the client side.
From: cairngorm-documentation@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cairngorm-documentation@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jeremysavoy
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 2:59 PM
To: cairngorm-documentation@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cairngorm-documentation] Re: Cannot assign arraycollection[i] value to VO variable due to ObjectProxy
I forgot to add, here is how I'm creating the AC:
__model.myAC = new ArrayCollection(
--- In cairngorm-documenta
<jeremysavoy@
>
> I have an array collection that is a collection of ContactVO items.
> When I debug and look at the ArrayCollection, each item, [0], [1], etc
> is of type ObjectProxy, and insed each of these there is an "object"
> that then contains the ContactVO fields. I'm assuming they are
> ObjectProxy because I implemented the fix outlined at the bottom of
> this page:
>
>
http://livedocs.
>
> The problem, is that when I try to assign a ContactVO directly to an
> item in the ArrayCollection, as here:
>
> for (var i:int = 0, i < __model.myAC.
> if (__model.myAC[
> __model.contact = __model.myAC[
> }
> }
>
> I then get the following error on the assignment line number (last
> line of code above).
>
> TypeError: Error #1034: Type Coercion failed: cannot convert
> mx.utils::ObjectPro
>
> If I assign each individual field from __model.myAC[
> __model.contact.
> and extra work - I suppose I would just implement a function to do this.
>
> Is there any better solution? I have tried the following but got a
> similar but maybe different error:
>
> __model.contact = __model.myAC[
>