Hugh
There are several companies..or people who believe that they have solved what they perceive as a solution, the dynamics of RF still have the best developers in a tizzy....it is not a secure format...too many intangibles which can interfere, climatic conditions, and environmental obstructions.
and then there is the problem...is the tag going to be active...or in-active, if it is active what will be the power source, and if it is in-active...what kind of authentication will be performed by the pylons, it can still only operates on an 8 bit format. That is why the tags are still several years from final development. Contact tags will have better information storage, but RF antenna tags are limited.
Bill
hughandrew2003 <hughandrew@...> wrote:
hughandrew2003 <hughandrew@...> wrote:
I am not sure who "we" are. Are you a representative of the RFID
industry? In any event, security and identity theft are the major
concerns that I know of and there doesn't appear to a resolution
yet. I have e-mailed Howard Moster to learn what he presented to
ASIS.
In industry there is product pull and product push. I get the
impression that in the case of RFID and in some desparation to
resolve certain throughput issues that we are facing "push" and that
we will see a questionably adequate "security and privacy" product
that will be marketed with the expectation that, once market share
is gained, the improvements will exist.
Hugh
--- In cansecurity@yahoogroups.com, "Romeo Marsico" <romeo@n...>
wrote:
> Bill / Fergus,
>
>
>
> I believe that what we got will do both 100% of the time.
>
> Inventory and security control.
>
>
>
>
>
> Romeo Marsico
>
> Nasa Technologies Inc.
>
> (514)977-7230
>
> www.nasa.ca
>
> _____
>
> From: cansecurity@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:cansecurity@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Bill
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:15 AM
> To: cansecurity@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [cansecurity] Re: RFID & The Security Industry
>
>
>
> The major players are investing in the tags...not for
security..but for
> inventory control....if it works the Wal-Marts of the world will
be able to
> reduce their staff by about 40%. The most time consuming task is
taking
> inventory, replenishment is usually done in the evenings..... the
security
> factor is a small bonus......but to be abale to locate and
invintory the
> product via rf...is cost saving
>
>
>
> Bill
>
> "Fergus V. Keyes" <fergusk35@y...> wrote:
>
> Bill; I agree that it is not 100% at this point. But it would seem
> that there are a lot of companies (i.e Wal Mart) that are
investing
> time and money on improving RFID . I know you have a great deal
more
> experience in retail security than I have, but it would seem to me
> that when products go missing, there are only a few possible
causes.
> Internal or External theft; or Poor paperwork and/or poor
inventory
> control. It would appear that RFID will be able to at least
> determine the cause of shrinkage for a specific item. The system
> should be able to determine if the product arrived at the
warehouse;
> if it was transferred to the retail location, and when, or if, it
> was sold. This information (if it is reasonably accurate), could
> help direct Security resources to an actual problem. Was it
stolden
> or just misplaced?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In cansecurity@yahoogroups.com, Bill <wdtcan@y...> wrote:
> > The technology is not 100% secure...it has a lot of down falls
> which are inherent in tags, but as a control tag, it has a lot of
> good dimensions. The applications will be what sells the
> concept...but to secure an item...it is only 40 to 60 % effective
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > hughandrew2003 <hughandrew@c...> wrote:
> > --- In cansecurity@yahoogroups.com, "Fergus V. Keyes"
> <fergusk35@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > Although RFID has been designed for Inventory Control, does
> anyone
> > > have any opinion on how this technolgy will affect the
Security
> > > Business?
> >
> > This is an interesting topic over which there is considerable
> debate.
> > I note that Howard Moster of Edmonton was to give a presentation
> at
> > the ASIS show on this last week. Howards e-mail is
> > hmoster@p...
> >
> > I'd like to hear views and experiences on this as well.
> >
> > Hugh
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > Computer internet security Computer business Securities industry
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> > Visit your group "cansecurity" on the web.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > cansecurity-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>
> * Visit your group "HYPERLINK
> "http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cansecurity"cansecurity" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> HYPERLINK
> "mailto:cansecurity-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
subject=Unsubscribe"cansecur
> ity-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the HYPERLINK
> "http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/"Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/106 - Release Date:
19/9/2005
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/106 - Release Date:
19/9/2005