You can define the segmentation rules in most CAT tools, but this only
defines, where the sentences are splitted.
But the punctation mark is part of the sentence, so you will get fuzzies,
when you use differentt punctations

Mit freundlichen Grüßen /Kind regards

Judy Ann Schoen

Dipl. Phys. Judy Ann Schoen
EDV & Seminare - Neue DVX und Office-Seminartermine ab August
**Atril's Certified Training Partner**
Tölzer Str. 12
83661 Lenggries
Tel. 08042 973197
Fax. 08042 973198
www.edv-und-seminare.de
mailto:info@...


> -----Original Message-----
> From: catmt@yahoogroups.com [mailto:catmt@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> johnrkohl
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 2:30 PM
> To: catmt@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [catmt] Does punctuation within segments affect exact matches in
> TM?
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm a technical editor for a software company, and I'm working on
> style guidelines to facilitate efficient translation. I hope that
> subscribers to this list can help me by responding to a couple of
> similar questions.
>
> Case 1:
>
> I'd like to know whether it is important for us to standardize which
> punctuation mark we use in cases where any one of multiple
> punctuation marks might be considered acceptable.
>
> In the following sentence, either an em dash or a colon could be
> used. Some of our writers even use double hyphens (ugh!) in place of
> an em dash.
>
> a) Every form has a current lock state—either locked or unlocked.
> b) Every form has a current lock state: either locked or unlocked.
> c) Every form has a current lock state -- either locked or unlocked.
>
> Would the difference in internal punctuation cause these to be fuzzy
> matches instead of exact matches in TM?
>
> I suppose that em dashes, colons, or double hyphens -could- be
> specified as segment boundaries, but would that typically be the
> case?
>
>
> Case 2:
>
> In this case, the only difference between the sentences is that the
> 2nd sentence contains a comma before "such as":
>
> a) JAR is a cross-platform file format that aggregates the files that
> are associated with Java applets such as webEIS documents.
> b) JAR is a cross-platform file format that aggregates the files that
> are associated with Java applets, such as webEIS documents.
>
> Would the comma cause these to be fuzzy matches instead of exact
> matches?
>
> In this case, I would hope so, because the comma affects the
> interpretation (and hence should affect the translation--in some
> languages, at least). The first sentence implies that webEIS
> documents are an example of Java applets, which is false. The second
> implies that webEIS documents are an example of "the files that are
> associated with Java applets," which is correct.
>
> Thanks.
>
> John Kohl
> Senior Technical Editor
> SAS Institute, Inc.
> Cary, North Carolina
> john.kohl@...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Send messages for the list to catmt@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe with a message to catmt-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>