Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ccd-newastro · The New CCD Astronomy
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 51050 - 51079 of 66203   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
51050
... Hello, On the above mentioned page you can read: 0.67 without any filters in path 0.63 with older filters and seperate 2mm IR Blocker (3mm total glass) ...
rolf
tinbook4711
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
8:55 am
51051
Thanks, Bud. It's an easy, photogenic pair of objects- It's nice to do something off the beaten path. The HII regions of the Cocoon Galaxies are surprisingly...
sc02492
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
10:53 am
51052
Thanks, Neil. It's an interesting pair of interacting spiral galaxies. A lot is known about it- it would be an even nicer target for a long focal length set...
sc02492
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
10:56 am
51053
What type of modification was made? Is it an Ha notch filter, or does it pass everything (including IR)? I believe the gradient is caused by a hot zone in the...
Dave Weaver
theweaveastro
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
12:10 pm
51054
... I opened your image in Photoshop CS and adjusted the color balance to remove the red cast. The adjustments were: Red, -40; Green +15; Blue +15. This was a...
Mike Dodd
doddm2001
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
12:14 pm
51055
Dave: The modification to the off-the-shelf Canon EOS 10D is the removal of the IR filter. Other that placing a Hutech LPS filter in the imaging chain, there...
mandellgl
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
2:43 pm
51056
Thank you Mike. I have pre-ordered Ron's book and look forward to its delivery. In the mean time I am expecting Photoshop Astronomy by R. Scott Ireland to...
mandellgl
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
2:49 pm
51057
I have been using FWHM for focus for a while but just as a focus aid. I keep reading about it used as a measurement of seeing. I assume you just multiply your...
Iver
iverriise
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
4:12 pm
51058
Tom, Jim, Steve, Wane,Neil, and Mike, Thanks for all the comments and suggestions. I will take them to heart and I plan on doing some "serious" reasoning with...
Don Waid
donwaid
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
4:33 pm
51059
Bob, Sorry I left you out of my previous post. I appreciate you comments and suggestions as well. This light pollution thing is a real problem, not only to...
Don Waid
donwaid
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
4:39 pm
51060
My long wait for an AP mount will soon come to a happy ending, which means it's time to start the CCD-camera selection process. This inquiry is about the...
elraeburn
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
4:57 pm
51061
Not entirely impractical...although an ST8 or 10 would give you better results. If you want to primarily do narrowband imaging, then head to the 8 or 10. If...
Neil Fleming
neilfleming
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
5:04 pm
51062
Warren: You and others are so fantastic - unraveling these CCD mysteries. I am just plunging into the mix of hobby/obsession/science/fun/art... After only 8...
Robert Kesler
rekesle
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
5:07 pm
51063
... Sounds good. But you should receive something that lets you download Ron's book NOW, so you can read it right away. Mike -- Mike Dodd Montpelier, VA (37...
Mike Dodd
doddm2001
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
5:20 pm
51064
Hello Don: No problem. I have learned so much from my association with these astro related newsgroups and saved a lot of money. Maybe I should take that...
Bob Runyan
runrob68876
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
5:49 pm
51065
Hi, Yes, if you multiply your FWHM reading (in pixels) by your image scale, that will produce an FWHM reading in arcseconds. Does this equate to actual seeing?...
Randy Nulman
randy_nulman
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
6:29 pm
51066
I agree with Neil. Ha/narrowband imaging _can_ be done with an ST2000 or similar "interline" chip camera, but the individual and total exposure times will...
Randy Nulman
randy_nulman
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
6:37 pm
51067
what version of photoshop do you recomend for post processing?...
firebirdthart
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
6:39 pm
51068
... CS2. CS because it handles 16-bit images in most of the processing steps, and CS2 because it has added a noise-reduction filter. Mike -- Mike Dodd ...
Mike Dodd
doddm2001
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
6:50 pm
51069
Photoshop CS which is version 8. Bob firebirdthart <thart40@...> wrote: what version of photoshop do you recomend for post processing? ... YAHOO! GROUPS...
Bob Birket
bobsccdimaging
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
6:55 pm
51070
Hi firebirdthart (?), At least Version 8. (PS_CS) This version allows 16 bit images in layers. This is a very big advantage of version 7 and earlier. Version...
Don Waid
donwaid
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
6:55 pm
51071
That's true; anyone who bought the new book, and does not know how to access the online preliminary edition, should contact me privately at support @ newastro2...
Wodaski - Yahoo
rwodaski
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
7:05 pm
51072
Quick focus exposures being less than 0.5 sec? George ... -- George Hall 12" LX200GPS ST-8XME, AO-7 Supercharge # 3777-2012 Dallas, Texas USA george2003 "at"...
George Hall
georgedhall2002
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
7:34 pm
51073
Yes, based on my experience this would be more than adequate...frankly, even 1 second exposures on an appropriate star...then averaged out, should do the job. ...
Randy Nulman
randy_nulman
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
7:43 pm
51074
To really capture the seeing accurately, you need: * Exposures 10ms or less (0.01 second) * An aperture of 10" or greater * The star must not be saturating in...
Wodaski - Yahoo
rwodaski
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
9:16 pm
51075
Hi Eric, I would like to offer up some other brands of cameras for your selection. SBIG uses Kodak chip based cameras that are both interline and full. Two...
skybud10
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
9:31 pm
51076
Ron, Have you ever seen a chart of the minimum seeing that can be accurately measured vs apeture and pixel size? I wonder how many people who complain of poor...
George Hall
georgedhall2002
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
9:56 pm
51077
I have seen such information, but don't have it at my finder tips. it is probably related to such things as Dawes' limit. I recall that you need about a 10"...
Wodaski - Yahoo
rwodaski
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2006
10:33 pm
51078
This is interesting, it seems counter intuitive to me. I would have guessed that measuring a longer exposure would be the way to measure seeing, ie. if the sky...
Iver
iverriise
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2006
1:39 am
51079
In order to measure seeing directly, you need exposures of 10ms or shorter. You will find that, typically, the longer the exposure, the greater the FWHM. If a...
Wodaski - Yahoo
rwodaski
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2006
1:57 am
Messages 51050 - 51079 of 66203   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help