Hi Sue,

Have you tried rebooting, or shutting down entirely and restarting?
Sometimes uploading new systems addles the brains!

Best,
Naomi


On 11/26/09 4:26 AM, "Sue Lightfoot" <slightfoot@...> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
> I have just installed Snow Leopard on my iMac using OS X. All seems
> well so far, except that when using Cindex with two indexes open I
> can no longer move between the record windows.
>
> When I have two indexes open side by side with a record window open
> in each, I used to be able to use the keyboard shortcut 'Command ~
> (tilde)' to move from one record window to the other. Now the
> shortcut just gets me from one main window to the other. This means
> that I have to reach for the mouse each time, which is annoying.
>
> Can anyone help, please?
>
> Sue



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I have just installed Snow Leopard on my iMac using OS X. All seems
well so far, except that when using Cindex with two indexes open I
can no longer move between the record windows.

When I have two indexes open side by side with a record window open
in each, I used to be able to use the keyboard shortcut 'Command ~
(tilde)' to move from one record window to the other. Now the
shortcut just gets me from one main window to the other. This means
that I have to reach for the mouse each time, which is annoying.

Can anyone help, please?

Sue

--
Sue Lightfoot - Accredited Indexer; Proofreader
Polperro, Cornwall
<slightfoot@...>

Absolutely!  There are Mac versions of word processing programs that will
open Word files, but if I were doing embedded indexing in Word I'd certainly
purchase the latest version of Office/Word for Mac. It works exactly like
Word for Windows. (I have both.)

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:42 AM, John Sampson <jrs.idx@...> wrote:

>
>
> I do embedded indexing on Word files sent to me by my clients. Can they
> be handled
> without Windows?
>
> Regards
>
> _John Sampson_
>
> Bonnie Hanks wrote:
> > When I switched to Mac I put Parallels and Windows on it so I could
> > continue using Sky. I did not like Parallels as I found it did slow
> > things down. Mostly I did not like it because their support is not
> > good. Sometimes I had problems moving files from one OS to another or
> > printing and, as I said, their support was not good. It's also an
> > expense because as they upgrade you have to upgrade your windows. I
> > finally bailed and got Cindex for Mac. It was a big switch but I'm
> > done with Windows.
> >
> >
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4631 (20091123) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I do embedded indexing on Word files sent to me by my clients. Can they
be handled
without Windows?

Regards

_John Sampson_

Bonnie Hanks wrote:
> When I switched to Mac I put Parallels and Windows on it so I could
> continue using Sky. I did not like Parallels as I found it did slow
> things down. Mostly I did not like it because their support is not
> good. Sometimes I had problems moving files from one OS to another or
> printing and, as I said, their support was not good.  It's also an
> expense because as they upgrade you have to upgrade your windows. I
> finally bailed and got Cindex for Mac. It was a big switch but I'm
> done with Windows.
>
>



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4631 (20091123) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

When I switched to Mac I put Parallels and Windows on it so I could
continue using Sky. I did not like Parallels as I found it did slow
things down. Mostly I did not like it because their support is not
good. Sometimes I had problems moving files from one OS to another or
printing and, as I said, their support was not good.  It's also an
expense because as they upgrade you have to upgrade your windows. I
finally bailed and got Cindex for Mac. It was a big switch but I'm
done with Windows.

I can't compare Cindex for PC and Cindex for Mac, obviously.

Good luck,
Bonnie


On Nov 21, 2009, at 12:47 PM, kennyhassman wrote:

> I'm at the crossroads of needing a new computer and find the new
> Mac with the 27" monitor very appealing. I have only ever used
> Windows-based computers. My questions are aimed at those using Macs
> and even more at those who either were Windows-based PC users and
> made the switch and/or those who use both meaning you have different
> computers-one with Windows and one Mac.
>
> Does anyone here have a Mac on which they run Parallels with a
> Windows operating system and then use Cindex and/or Word on it?
> If so what is your experience with the performance. I'm interested
> to know if adding a level of the computer's interactivity (by adding
> Parallels and a different operating system) has an effect on the
> performance of the Mac - does it slow the system down.
>
> Also how about using Cindex for Mac - for those who have used both
> Cdx for Mac and Cdx for Windows-how do they compare?
>
> Thank you!!
>
> Ken
>
>
>

Bonnie Hanks

Hanks Indexing
2049 Middlebranch Dr.
North Garden, VA 22959
434-960-6805
bhanks@...
http://www.hanksindexing.com/







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I have a number of pc's and one Mac Mini.  I felt I did not need the
big Mac (pun intended) as I already had a big screen monitor (26").  I
bought the Cindex for Mac as I did not parallel the mini.   But for
those who believe that the mac is perfect - let me assure it is not.
It still freezes - however not nearly as often as my Vista laptop
crashed.  Maybe it is because it is a mini or 'cause I only have 2 gig
of ram instead of 4, but I still have problems with freeze.  Come
January I will be updating everything   I have never used macros with
anything I ever did except in Word Perfect 5.0 so I don't miss having
them.  But when I start indexing a journal that has been published
since 1944. I bet they would come in handy.

Because I was broke - I decided not to buy Office for Mac.  Getting
used to OpenOffice and Iwork is not as easy as I had hoped.  I guess
my MS Office is too ingrained in my brain, so allow plenty of time for
learning the differences, if you do not purchase Office for Mac.  (Or
do not do as I did and not pay attention to the beginning tutorials LOL)

When I did my index in Cindex for Mac, I used PDF's and was able to
have both open next to each other on the wide screen monitor - no
paper needed.  I could also make the fonts big enough that I could
read both sides of the screen easily.  Plus the PDF let me highlight
words/names plus write notes on the document.  That was so great!


All the best with whatever you decide to purchase.  The ONLY thing I
can truly recommend is the big screen monitor


On Nov 21, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Laurie Winship wrote:

I'm at the same point--but I'm so tired of Windows updates and
antivirus updates, that slow everything down, I'm switching to a Mac
with no regrets. My old PC is still running so I'm keeping it
(offline) just for Cindex until it totally dies--then I'll get the Mac
version of Cindex--which you do get at a reduced rate if you have the
PC version.


Jacqueline Wilson
jawpub@...

"wilssearch - your service of choice for the indexing challenged
genealogist."







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I'm at the same point--but I'm so tired of Windows updates and antivirus
updates, that slow everything down, I'm switching to a Mac with no regrets.  My
old PC is still running so I'm keeping it (offline) just for Cindex until it
totally dies--then I'll get the Mac version of Cindex--which you do get at a
reduced rate if you have the PC version.

Frances told me she runs Cindex on her Mac with Parallels for demonstration
purposes and it works fine. But as I understand it you still need to load
Windows onto your Mac--and will still have to update it, etc.

Switching to a new Cindex version makes me a little nervous too--but I think the
tradeoffs will be more than worth it when the time comes.

Good luck--Laurie
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: kennyhassman
   To: cindexusers@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 12:47 PM
   Subject: [cindexusers] Cindex on Mac with Parallels (or comparable program)



   I'm at the crossroads of needing a new computer and find the new
   Mac with the 27" monitor very appealing. I have only ever used Windows-based
computers. My questions are aimed at those using Macs and even more at those who
either were Windows-based PC users and made the switch and/or those who use both
meaning you have different computers-one with Windows and one Mac.

   Does anyone here have a Mac on which they run Parallels with a
   Windows operating system and then use Cindex and/or Word on it?
   If so what is your experience with the performance. I'm interested to know if
adding a level of the computer's interactivity (by adding Parallels and a
different operating system) has an effect on the performance of the Mac - does
it slow the system down.

   Also how about using Cindex for Mac - for those who have used both Cdx for Mac
and Cdx for Windows-how do they compare?

   Thank you!!

   Ken






------------------------------------------------------------------------------



   No virus found in this incoming message.
   Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
   Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.75/2516 - Release Date: 11/20/09
19:43:00


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I'm in same situation right now and will be interested in reading the
responses.  My husband just made the switch to an iMac because he was
tired of his old computer crashing and I'm thinking of following.  He
has been using a  program called CrossOver Mac ( $40 and free trial).
So far, he has had no trouble running his old Windows programs using
it.  I'm going to try windows Cindex on it to see how well it runs.  I'm
thinking it might at least be a good transition.

kennyhassman wrote:
>
>
> I'm at the crossroads of needing a new computer and find the new
> Mac with the 27" monitor very appealing. I have only ever used
> Windows-based computers. My questions are aimed at those using Macs
> and even more at those who either were Windows-based PC users and made
> the switch and/or those who use both meaning you have different
> computers-one with Windows and one Mac.
>

I haven't used the Windows version, but -- no macros on the Mac. A
long-standing sore point even though I fully support the work Fran and
Peter do, and they do a great job on both platforms.

-Larry

On Nov 21, 2009, at 11:47 AM, kennyhassman wrote:

> <snip>
> Also how about using Cindex for Mac - for those who have used both
> Cdx for Mac and Cdx for Windows-how do they compare?
>
> Thank you!!
>
> Ken
>

I'm at the crossroads of needing a new computer and find the new
Mac with the 27" monitor very appealing. I have only ever used Windows-based
computers. My questions are aimed at those using Macs and even more at those who
either were Windows-based PC users and made the switch and/or those who use both
meaning you have different computers-one with Windows and one Mac.

Does anyone here have a Mac on which they run Parallels with a
Windows operating system and then use Cindex and/or Word on it?
If so what is your experience with the performance. I'm interested to know if
adding a level of the computer's interactivity (by adding Parallels and a
different operating system) has an effect on the performance of the Mac - does
it slow the system down.

Also how about using Cindex for Mac - for those who have used both Cdx for Mac
and Cdx for Windows-how do they compare?

Thank you!!

Ken

Spot on.

-Larry Harrison

On Nov 21, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Carolyn Weaver wrote:

> I'm going to step in as moderator here and declare this thread off-
> topic for
> this list, unless it applies specifically to the use of Cindex.  It's
> currently being addressed on at least 3 other lists, so let's keep
> this one
> a turkey-free zone, in the spirit of Thanksgiving.
>
> Carolyn Weaver
> CindexUsers moderator
>

I'm going to step in as moderator here and declare this thread off-topic for
this list, unless it applies specifically to the use of Cindex.  It's
currently being addressed on at least 3 other lists, so let's keep this one
a turkey-free zone, in the spirit of Thanksgiving.

Carolyn Weaver
CindexUsers moderator

Actually, I've never deleted a user dictionary -- just started a new one
under a different name.

Carolyn Weaver

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew White" <matt@...>
To: <cindexusers@yahoogroups.com>; "Frances S. Lennie"
<flennie@...>
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 10:07 PM
Subject: [cindexusers] user dictionary, mac version?


> This happened to me with Cindex for Windows.
> My user dictionary is "full" and Cindex crashes whenever I try to add a
> new term.
> In Windows, the solution was to delete it.
> 1) Is this the solution in Mac?
> 2) If so, how do I find it?
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> You can review and change your settings for this group at :
> http://www.egroups.com/group/cindexusersYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

I would not vote for Sarah Palin if you held a gun to my head. I also
would not call the very funny Slate parody an index.

The ASI has (unfortunately & unprofessionally to many indexers) given
Sarah and her publisher their first Golden Turkey award. Supposed to
publicze the need for indexes. So for has gotten lots of play on
Index-L. A supporter posted on the Daily Kos. Otherwise the shocking
headline news that indexers feel dissed when a best-seller doesn't have
an index has been stiffed in the media.

Tiny Fey's spot-on imitation of Palin has scooped the ASI's statement
about its award.

As a former publicist, I think ASI will only get negative publicity from
this unprofessional move.

gursnuff wrote:
>>From Slate: Sarah Palin didn't put an index in her book. So we made one for
her
>
> http://www.slate.com/id/2235917/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> You can review and change your settings for this group at :
> http://www.egroups.com/group/cindexusersYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


--
Best,
Pam Rider
Trying to walk cheerfully on the Earth

From Slate: Sarah Palin didn't put an index in her book. So we made one for her

http://www.slate.com/id/2235917/

This happened to me with Cindex for Windows.
My user dictionary is "full" and Cindex crashes whenever I try to add a
new term.
In Windows, the solution was to delete it.
1) Is this the solution in Mac?
2) If so, how do I find it?

Yes, sorry--I have it straight now.
Laurie
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Naomi Linzer
   To: cindexusers@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 12:17 PM
   Subject: Re: [cindexusers] New email



   You need to do this at yahoogroups.com

   On 11/20/09 8:41 AM, "Laurie Winship" <lauriearw@...> wrote:

   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   > Hello,
   >
   > Please change my email contact from lauriearw@...
   > <mailto:lauriearw%40earthlink.net> to lauriearw@...
   > <mailto:lauriearw%40gmail.com>
   >
   > Thanks, Laurie Winship
   >
   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






------------------------------------------------------------------------------



   No virus found in this incoming message.
   Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
   Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.74/2515 - Release Date: 11/20/09
08:02:00


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

You need to do this at yahoogroups.com


On 11/20/09 8:41 AM, "Laurie Winship" <lauriearw@...> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Please change my email contact from lauriearw@...
> <mailto:lauriearw%40earthlink.net>  to lauriearw@...
> <mailto:lauriearw%40gmail.com>
>
> Thanks, Laurie Winship
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hello,

Please change my email contact from lauriearw@... to
lauriearw@...

Thanks, Laurie Winship

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Duhhhhhh.  Couldn't see the forest for the trees!

Thanks for the quick response,
Mary

What are you putting in the FIND field? Will 3.2. work so you can find all
entries with 3.2.?


On 11/18/09 12:56 PM, "harperindexing" <mharper@...>
wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
> Hello all,
> I'm using section numbers with periods in them as locators. When I try to
> "Find" a span of them I only get the entries with that exact page span and not
> all the other entries with any of the locators in between.
>
> Page span example:
> 3.2.-3.2.5.
>
> So I get the two entries with that span as a locator, but the entries with
> 3.2.3, 3.2.4 etc. don't show up in the Find grouping.
>
> I've tried it with All and Page in the FIELD box.
> I've tried Evaluate References and Pattern as well.
>
> Is there some other setting I can use to make this work?
>
> Thanks in advance for any assistance.
> Mary
>
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hello all,
I'm using section numbers with periods in them as locators. When I try to "Find"
a span of them I only get the entries with that exact page span and not all the
other entries with any of the locators in between.

Page span example:
3.2.-3.2.5.

So I get the two entries with that span as a locator, but the entries with
3.2.3, 3.2.4 etc. don't show up in the Find grouping.

I've tried it with All and Page in the FIELD box.
I've tried Evaluate References and Pattern as well.

Is there some other setting I can use to make this work?

Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Mary

Now if I can just remember to go to the archives when I face this probalem
next year!

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Naomi Linzer <jnlinzer@...>wrote:

>
>
> Glad you got some good help...and thanks for letting us know the fix. Naomi
>
>
> On 11/17/09 8:04 PM, "kennyhassman"
<kennyhassman@...<kennyhassman%40yahoo.com>>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Naomi, there is a lot of other formatting that has been used also
> regarding
> > the volume designators, bolding of designators, suppressing some of the
> > bolding, etc. plus Frances sent me a few patterns to use to help with
> some
> > Search and Replace issues. Still, I am also surprised that this easy fix
> > worked but I'm sitting here staring at the nearly done index and all is
> well!
> >
> > Ken
> >
> > --- In cindexusers@yahoogroups.com <cindexusers%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:
> cindexusers%40yahoogroups.com <cindexusers%2540yahoogroups.com>> ,
>
> > Naomi Linzer <jnlinzer@...> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Is there another step?
> >> >
> >> > I get this:
> >> >
> >> > testing, 1:55; 1:60; 2:75; 2:77­78; 3:45; 3:55­56
> >> >
> >> > And not this:
> >> >
> >> > testing, 1:55, 1:60; 2:75, 2:77­78; 3:45, 3:55­56
> >> >
> >> >
> >>> > >Turns out to have been a totally easy fix.
> >> >
> >>> > >Document > Reference syntax > Separator > ;
> >> >
> >> > KH
> >> >
> >> > --- In cindexusers@yahoogroups.com
<cindexusers%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:
> cindexusers%40yahoogroups.com <cindexusers%2540yahoogroups.com>> ,
>
> >> "kennyhassman" <kennyhassman@> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > If someone really knows how to convert a final comma at the end of
> >>> > > a string of locators for one volume to a semi-colon before the
> volume
> >>> number
> >> > changes please get back to me asap, I would greatly appreciate it.
> This is
> >> worth
> >> > a $25 amazon.com gift certificate to me!
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Here is what I need to happen.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > From this:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > abolition
> >>> > > ...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598, 2:46, 299, 3:52
> >>> > >
> >>> > > to this:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > abolition
> >>> > > ...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598; 2:46, 299; 3:52
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Glad you got some good help...and thanks for letting us know the fix. Naomi


On 11/17/09 8:04 PM, "kennyhassman" <kennyhassman@...> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
>
> Naomi, there is a lot of other formatting that has been used also regarding
> the volume designators, bolding of designators, suppressing some of the
> bolding, etc. plus Frances sent me a few patterns to use to help with some
> Search and Replace issues. Still, I am also surprised that this easy fix
> worked but I'm sitting here staring at the nearly done index and all is well!
>
> Ken
>
> --- In cindexusers@yahoogroups.com <mailto:cindexusers%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> Naomi Linzer <jnlinzer@...> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Is there another step?
>> >
>> > I get this:
>> >
>> > testing, 1:55; 1:60; 2:75; 2:77­78; 3:45; 3:55­56
>> >
>> > And not this:
>> >
>> > testing, 1:55, 1:60; 2:75, 2:77­78; 3:45, 3:55­56
>> >
>> >
>>> > >Turns out to have been a totally easy fix.
>> >
>>> > >Document > Reference syntax > Separator > ;
>> >
>> > KH
>> >
>> > --- In cindexusers@yahoogroups.com <mailto:cindexusers%40yahoogroups.com> ,
>> "kennyhassman" <kennyhassman@> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > If someone really knows how to convert a final comma at the end of
>>> > > a string of locators for one volume to a semi-colon before the volume
>>> number
>> > changes please get back to me asap, I would greatly appreciate it. This is
>> worth
>> > a $25 amazon.com gift certificate to me!
>>> > >
>>> > > Here is what I need to happen.
>>> > >
>>> > > From this:
>>> > >
>>> > > abolition
>>> > > ...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598, 2:46, 299, 3:52
>>> > >
>>> > > to this:
>>> > >
>>> > > abolition
>>> > > ...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598; 2:46, 299; 3:52
>> >
>
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Naomi, there is a lot of other formatting that has been used also regarding the
volume designators, bolding of designators, suppressing some of the bolding,
etc. plus Frances sent me a few patterns to use to help with some Search and
Replace issues. Still, I am also surprised that this easy fix worked but I'm
sitting here staring at the nearly done index and all is well!

Ken



--- In cindexusers@yahoogroups.com, Naomi Linzer <jnlinzer@...> wrote:
>
>
> Is there another step?
>
> I get this:
>
> testing, 1:55; 1:60; 2:75; 2:77­78; 3:45; 3:55­56
>
> And not this:
>
> testing, 1:55, 1:60; 2:75, 2:77­78; 3:45, 3:55­56
>
>
> >Turns out to have been a totally easy fix.
>
> >Document > Reference syntax > Separator > ;
>
> KH
>
> --- In cindexusers@yahoogroups.com, "kennyhassman" <kennyhassman@> wrote:
> >
> > If someone really knows how to convert a final comma at the end of
> > a string of locators for one volume to a semi-colon before the volume number
> changes please get back to me asap, I would greatly appreciate it. This is
worth
> a $25 amazon.com gift certificate to me!
> >
> > Here is what I need to happen.
> >
> > From this:
> >
> > abolition
> > ...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598, 2:46, 299, 3:52
> >
> > to this:
> >
> > abolition
> > ...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598; 2:46, 299; 3:52
>

Okay...never mind. Naomi


On 11/17/09 2:05 PM, "Connie Binder" <flagday_1960@...> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
> It looks like you have your page references the way you want them within
> volumes, so you just have to change the separator between volumes.
>
> From the top menu, choose Document > Reference Syntax
> In the Reference Syntax dialog box, type a semi-colon into the Separator box
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Connie Binder
>
> --- On Tue, 11/17/09, kennyhassman <kennyhassman@...
> <mailto:kennyhassman%40yahoo.com> > wrote:
>
> From: kennyhassman <kennyhassman@... <mailto:kennyhassman%40yahoo.com> >
> Subject: [cindexusers] final comma to semi-colon in VOLUMES
> To: cindexusers@yahoogroups.com <mailto:cindexusers%40yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Tuesday, November 17, 2009, 2:24 PM
>
>  
>
> If someone really knows how to convert a final comma at the end of
>
> a string of locators for one volume to a semi-colon before the volume number
> changes please get back to me asap, I would greatly appreciate it. This is
> worth a $25 amazon.com gift certificate to me!
>
> Here is what I need to happen.
>
> From this:
>
> abolition
>
> ...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598, 2:46, 299, 3:52
>
> to this:
>
> abolition
>
> ...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598; 2:46, 299; 3:52
>
> Thank you. This index is due on Friday and I need to get this handled.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Ken
>
> .
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Is there another step?

I get this:

testing, 1:55; 1:60; 2:75; 2:77­78; 3:45; 3:55­56

And not this:

testing, 1:55, 1:60; 2:75, 2:77­78; 3:45, 3:55­56


>Turns out to have been a totally easy fix.

>Document > Reference syntax > Separator > ;

KH

--- In cindexusers@yahoogroups.com, "kennyhassman" <kennyhassman@...> wrote:
>
> If someone really knows how to convert a final comma at the end of
> a string of locators for one volume to a semi-colon before the volume number
changes please get back to me asap, I would greatly appreciate it. This is worth
a $25 amazon.com gift certificate to me!
>
> Here is what I need to happen.
>
> From this:
>
> abolition
> ...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598, 2:46, 299, 3:52
>
> to this:
>
> abolition
> ...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598; 2:46, 299; 3:52

Turns out to have been a totally easy fix.

Document > Reference syntax > Separator > ;

KH

--- In cindexusers@yahoogroups.com, "kennyhassman" <kennyhassman@...> wrote:
>
> If someone really knows how to convert a final comma at the end of
> a string of locators for one volume to a semi-colon before the volume number
changes please get back to me asap, I would greatly appreciate it. This is worth
a $25 amazon.com gift certificate to me!
>
> Here is what I need to happen.
>
> From this:
>
> abolition
> ...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598, 2:46, 299, 3:52
>
> to this:
>
> abolition
> ...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598; 2:46, 299; 3:52
>
> Thank you. This index is due on Friday and I need to get this handled.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Ken
>

It looks like you have your page references the way you want them within
volumes, so you just have to change the separator between volumes.

From the top menu, choose Document > Reference Syntax
In the Reference Syntax dialog box, type a semi-colon into the Separator box

Hope this helps!

Connie Binder

--- On Tue, 11/17/09, kennyhassman <kennyhassman@...> wrote:

From: kennyhassman <kennyhassman@...>
Subject: [cindexusers] final comma to semi-colon in VOLUMES
To: cindexusers@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, November 17, 2009, 2:24 PM







 









       If someone really knows how to convert a final comma at the end of

a string of locators for one volume to a semi-colon before the volume number
changes please get back to me asap, I would greatly appreciate it. This is worth
a $25 amazon.com gift certificate to me!



Here is what I need to happen.



From this:



abolition

...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598, 2:46, 299, 3:52



to this:



abolition

...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598; 2:46, 299; 3:52



Thank you. This index is due on Friday and I need to get this handled.



Thank you!



Ken























   .





















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

If someone really knows how to convert a final comma at the end of
a string of locators for one volume to a semi-colon before the volume number
changes please get back to me asap, I would greatly appreciate it. This is worth
a $25 amazon.com gift certificate to me!

Here is what I need to happen.

From this:

abolition
...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598, 2:46, 299, 3:52

to this:

abolition
...of nuclear weapons, 1:67, 233-234, 598; 2:46, 299; 3:52

Thank you. This index is due on Friday and I need to get this handled.

Thank you!

Ken