Yes, Cloudy has changed a lot since the c06.02 release! There is almost a whole year of development in between... These stable versions I pointed you to do not...
Hi Folks, I must be blind, I didn't suceed to find the way to print-out the filling factor at each step of a simulation. This is needed to compute the line...
Hi Christophe, I guess there is nothing wrong with your eyesight after all... :-) A quick grep through the code suggests that we indeed do not punch the ...
... Fine! ... It could be fine then to add a new column (last position to not perturb existing parsers) in the punch physical conditions output. Tanks a lot...
About the filling factor, would it be posible to give its value in an external routine, the fabden.c for exemple? Then it could be easy to have FF following...
... the filling factor is defined in the file zone_startend.c around line 57 - 59. the source there defines it in terms of the radius with the optional power....
Dear cloudy-users! Has any-one ever made a raymond-smith spectrum? I have trouble finding some more elaborate examples of cloudy code on the internet. For...
You can print all the possible lines available using a command in Hazy. You can find total line flux (luminosity) in the output file if it strong enough. The...
Hi, I want to output the intensities of various recombination lines, but I'm not sure of who's whos in the list... For exemple, here are the OII lines observed...
Hi Christophe, I have to admit that the line list in Cloudy can be confusing, usually the best source of information is the Cloudy source itself. In general ...
Thanks a lot Peter, ... Fine, that's what Moore call the V2 multiplet, and actually it is predicted very close to the observation. ... Ok, that's also the V2...
... I am not aware of a paper specifically discussing the use of Cloudy in this context, but there is literature on the infamous t^2 problem which would be...
... The recombination data are taken from these original papers: 110 permitted recombination lines of C, N, O (Pequignot, Petitjean, & Boisson, 1991, A&A, 251,...
Can you share any information about the release date of the next version of Cloudy? I see in your revision history that your target was January '07. Thanks! ...
Greetings, The next major release of Cloudy, 07.02.00, is posted on the web site http://www.nublado.org Volume 1 of Hazy has also been revised and is part of...
Hi, my work consists of modelling a sample of Planetary Nebulae, I also need the prediction for the radio continuum flux. 1. Which version of Cloudy do I have...
Hello, I have been trying to reproduce Pequignot et al. 2001 CLOUDY values for the thin x-ray model. The conversion that I am using for the x-ray ionization...
... these are the sims agn_lex00_*.in in the test suite / auto directory. the atomic data have changed since the 2000 meeting. dielectronic recombination...
Greetings ... you should always use the current stable version. This year it is version C07.02 ... it predicts the full spectrum. I would look at the quick...
Hi, I'm not able to access the ftp site where the file stars.tar.gz is located. I'm still using the old Cloudy, c06_02, so I'm following the instructions on...
Dear Valentina, There must have been some mishap in the upgrade to version c07_02 of the code. We have replaced the old stellar atmosphere files. The correct...
Hello, I have a question regarding density law and filling factor. I would like to combine the two in my Cloudy calculations, does it make a physical sense? In...
... Hi Ania You are right that combining the two can be done on an empirical basis. The code will treat the microphysics and radiative transfer correctly. ...
Just a caution here. If the radio emission from a Cloudy PN model is optically thin then the code calculates it properly. However at high enough densities or...
Hi Kevin, This is a well known problem. The bottom line is that you can get the correct answer for optically thick conditions only by using exact radiative...
