Skip to search.
cmmi_process_improvement · CMMi Process Improvement

Group Information

  • Members: 2647
  • Category: Development
  • Founded: Jun 21, 2002
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 7966 - 7995 of 19254   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
7966 Agnihotri, Suyash IN ...
suyash_agnih... Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2007
3:19 pm
Hi Sal What is R in your formula? Where is A used? Do you mean following? Productivity index = Planned value - (earned value - actual value) / planned value ...
7967 Nicolae Giurescu
n_giurescu Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2007
3:19 pm
Yes, of course! … provided the content is relevant. You do not need to put them under CM system, as you most likely don’t need the whole functionality...
7968 sandrobsiqueira Offline Send Email Feb 1, 2007
3:19 pm
Hi All! I'm a SQA Analyst working in a small TI company (70 people). We are implementing CMMI2 (more specifically REQM SP 1.4). I'd like request a suggest...
7969 registerqa Offline Send Email Feb 1, 2007
3:19 pm
hi What details can be covered , within a progress report for a Support project , which has no defined WBS , no total effort estimation , no risks as project...
7970 Megan Brown
meganole25 Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2007
3:21 pm
The Case of the Missing Fingerprint <http://www.stickyminds.com/BetterSoftware/magazine.asp?fn=cifea> February 2007- Better Software Magazine Feature Article ...
7971 Jeff Dalton
jrd200x Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2007
6:40 pm
Sandro, REQM SP1.4 specifically refers to maintaining bi-directional traceability between requirements. So it stands to reason that this type of practice ...
7972 hoppenheimer@...
heatheroppen... Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2007
6:41 pm
I agree with Pat (1 more LA out of 420...) Whether or not email is acceptable direct evidence depends on the business context - how it is used, for what...
7973 Jeff Dalton
jrd200x Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2007
6:41 pm
Juan, I’m going with Pat on this one. But let me also add some clarification and put forth another premise.. Is this even the right question? The SCAMPI...
7974 Bruno, Salvatore R
sr_bruno94583 Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2007
6:42 pm
Suyash, Sorry about the typo: The Productivity Index = [ P - (R - A)] / P x 100 % Where P = Planned hours (or BCWS) R = Result hours (or BCWP) A = Actual...
7975 Melih Sindel
sindelmel Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2007
6:43 pm
Bruno, When the values below are applied to your equation: "The Productivity Index = [ P – (R – E)] / P x 100 %" we get: = [8-(11-11)]/100 = [8-0]/100 = 8%...
7976 Suzanne Zampella
sbzampella Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2007
1:11 am
make me one more lead appraiser "yes" with the previous caveats. I need to be able to tell what it was. I strongly recommend that the important emails me...
7977 Rama R
ramaprb Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2007
3:06 am
Hi Melih, Request your clarification for the Schedule Performance Index: SPI = EV/PV = 8/11 = about 0.75 or about 75% mentioned in your mail. I think it should...
7978 Quy Hoang Sy
hsquy@... Send Email
Feb 2, 2007
3:07 am
Hi Sal 1. Could you please describe how to collect “Actual hours” and “Result hours” per each task? It seems to me that “Actual hours” is the same...
7979 P, Saravanakumaran
ps_kumaran Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2007
4:27 am
Hi all I am interested in participating or be part of an active discussion forum for understanding best practices of Support and Maintenance projects or...
7980 chalapathi jammala
jkanni Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2007
11:52 pm
Hi, If my organisation is already a ISO certified or six sigma certified one, can i go directly to high maturity levels in CMMI like level 4&5 instead of level...
7981 zuljamia Offline Send Email Feb 2, 2007
11:52 pm
We are ISO 9001:2000 certified. We want to go for CMMI Ver 1.2 Level 4. Is it possible? Some say we need to go for level 3 and then only 4. regards Zul Jami...
7982 Carmen Marin
carmenita_marin Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2007
11:55 pm
In addition to what Jeff has already said before, would be that a criteria for breaking-down the requirements is to have, in the end, testable and veriafiable...
7983 Melih Sindel
sindelmel Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2007
11:55 pm
Yes you are right: I've been dealing with these stuff on and off for last 20 years, yet Bruno managed to confuse me with his parameter names and his equation:)...
7984 preeti yadav
preeti9679 Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2007
11:55 pm
Hi All, Can anybody help me in understanding 1. How is effort calculated, after calculating size of a software in Function points ? 2.what is the...
7985 Bruno, Salvatore R
sr_bruno94583 Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2007
11:59 pm
Hello Quy, All information is collected through a time reporting system. Therefore, "Actual hours" is the number of hours people actual worked doing the task...
7986 Soowan Lee
soowanlee Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2007
4:55 pm
Hello Zul, Your organization can be appraised at any target level. It's not required to be at ML3 for going for ML4 although it is more logical to move one...
7987 registerqa Offline Send Email Feb 3, 2007
4:56 pm
hi Can any one help that WHAT can/should be captured in progress reports for support projects as they have NO total effort estimation / WBS / schdule etc..... ...
7988 mikepinto1 Offline Send Email Feb 3, 2007
5:00 pm
Hello Kanni, SEI-CMMI is very specific and rightfully so, " one cannot skip maturity levels" Hence, you gruop will have to go through SCAMPI A for levels 2 ...
7989 Neil Potter
neilspotter Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2007
12:42 am
Hi mike This is not true. It is recommended that one assess at the early levels to make improvement incremental. But it is not required. You can assess L5 on ...
7990 Nicolae Giurescu
n_giurescu Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2007
12:43 am
Hello Mike, You cannot skip levels in your process improvement effort, but you do not need a SCAMPI A for each level though. With version 1.2 it seems that is...
7991 Jeffrey Dalton
jrd200x Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2007
12:43 am
Michael, Actually, the CMMI is very specific that "Maturity levels SHOULD not be skipped." This by definition means they can be, although I would not...
7992 Larry Fellows
deepblue948 Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2007
12:43 am
Michael, You are correct that Kanni's organization would need to verify they are fulfilling the goals of the ML2 and ML3 process areas as well as the ML 4 ...
7993 chalapathi jammala
jkanni Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2007
1:47 pm
HI Jeff, I mean to say that we will not skip the level 2 & 3 in reaching level 5 but in one short 1-2 years of time we want to reach level 5 . We will...
7994 Neil Potter
neilspotter Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2007
1:57 pm
Hi chalapathi It is not necessary to appraise at a lower level first. You can start appraising whenever you like. It just adds risk when you scope the...
7995 Larry Fellows
deepblue948 Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2007
2:41 pm
I fully agree with Neil. My earlier advice to check progress using some technique other than a SCAMPI A will help to mitigate the risk but not eliminate it. ...
Messages 7966 - 7995 of 19254   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help