Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

cnsbb · CNS software package bulletin board

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 1327
  • Category: Biology
  • Founded: Mar 23, 2001
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 1773 - 1802 of 2225   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#1773 From: "guarnieri_michael" <guarnieri_michael@...>
Date: Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:47 pm
Subject: scatter.lib error in water_pick.inp
guarnieri_mi...
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear All,
I am attempting to refine a structure with BeF3- as a ligand.
Initially I received the error message;

%XRASSOC-ERR: missing SCATter definition for (each of the atoms)

I redefined scatter.lib, and was able to proceed with minimize.inp,
bgroup.inp, and bindividual.inp without error. However, when I
attempted to add water using water_pick.inp, I again encountered the
above error message.

Has anyone encountered this problem before? Any suggestions?
Thanks!
Mike
UCHSC

#1774 From: Robert Sweet <sweet@...>
Date: Tue Jan 6, 2009 3:31 pm
Subject: Reminder: Please apply to the BNL-Biology and NSLS Course on Synchrotron Data Collection
sweet@...
Send Email Send Email
 
We are offering RapiData 2009, the eleventh offering of our popular course:

    Rapid Data Collection and Structure Solving at the NSLS: A Practical
           Course in Macromolecular X-Ray Diffraction Measurement

The course will be held 19-24 April 2009.  Students could be at any level from
advanced undergraduate to full professor.  48 students will be accepted; 24
will bring their own specimens for data collection.  Please read the course
description at http://www.px.nsls.bnl.gov/RapiData2009/. You'll see that many
experts in the field will be available for lectures and tutorials, and you'll
find the application materials at this site.

For the seventh time we will hold a short lecture course on the fundamentals of
crystallography for roughly five hours on Sunday 19 April. The body of the
RapiData course really requires that students have a healthy knowledge of
crystallography.  For potential students who have some experience but are shaky
about fundamentals, this course will help. There will be a small additional fee
for the fundamentals course, to pay for Saturday night accomodations and food
on Sunday morning and noon.

Latin American Scientists: Several scholarships are available, from the
International Union of Crystallography, to pay partial travel and subsistence
costs for Latin-American students and junior faculty.  Please apply for the
course, and then contact R. Sweet (sweet@...) if you are interested in
applying for a scholarship.  In accordance with the standards of the
International Union of Crystallography, we observe the basic policy of
non-discrimination, affirming the right and freedom of scientists to associate
in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as
citizenship, religion, creed, political stance, ethnic origin, race, colour,
language, age, or gender, in accordance with the Statutes of the International
Council for Science.  At this course no barriers will exist beyond the
application procedure that would prevent the participation of bona fide
scientists.

Please apply or send your students to our course,

Alex Soares, Sal Sclafani, and Bob Sweet

=========================================================================
          Robert M. Sweet                 E-Dress: sweet@...
          Group Leader, PXRR: Macromolecular               ^ (that's L
            Crystallography Research Resource at NSLS            not 1)
            http://px.nsls.bnl.gov/
          Biology Dept
          Brookhaven Nat'l Lab.           Phones:
          Upton, NY  11973                631 344 3401  (Office)
          U.S.A.                          631 344 2741  (Facsimile)
=========================================================================

#1775 From: "mita_jhj" <mita_jhj@...>
Date: Wed Jan 7, 2009 8:32 am
Subject: help regarding get_ncs_matrices
mita_jhj
Send Email Send Email
 
hi all,

i am using CNS 1.2. can you please let me know what should be the
input in get_ncs_matrices.inp

i do not get what i need to fill in place of:

segid AAAA and name CA

thanks in advance
jasmita

#1776 From: Daniel Schlieper <daniel@...>
Date: Wed Jan 7, 2009 9:22 am
Subject: Re: help regarding get_ncs_matrices
daniel_schli...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Jasmita,

have a look at http://cns-online.org/v1.21/ -> Tutorial -> Selecting
Atoms.

Best regards, Daniel

--
Daniel Schlieper                     email: daniel.schlieper@...
Biochemie der Pflanzen               phone: +49 211 8115232
Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet          fax  : +49 211 8113569
40225 Duesseldorf, Germany           http://www.biologie.uni-duesseldorf.de

On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, mita_jhj wrote:

> hi all,
>
> i am using CNS 1.2. can you please let me know what should be the
> input in get_ncs_matrices.inp
>
> i do not get what i need to fill in place of:
>
> segid AAAA and name CA
>
> thanks in advance
> jasmita
>
>

#1777 From: "Masaki UNNO" <unno19@...>
Date: Thu Jan 8, 2009 11:56 am
Subject: ERROR in SIRAS
unno19@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi

I am trying determine the phase of a structure by Single Isomorphous
Replacement Anomalous Scattering (SIRAS).
When I use the input file "ir_phase.inp", the following error occurs. What
are the problems?  Could you give me suggestions?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Program version= 1.2 File version= 1.2
  Minimum of     32138 elements =                 2.7500
  Maximum of     32138 elements =                29.7337
  ANOMalous=TRUE {ON}
  Sum of     83129 elements =             25912.0000
  Sum of     83129 elements =                 0.0000
  ERROR: Anomalous form factors (f'') are zero for all
atoms
  associated with LOC f_peak.

      -> Check atom selection for LOC f_peak
      -> Check form factor library.
      -> Are you using an anomalous form factor library?
  %  error encountered: ABORT statement specified.
    (CNS is in mode: SET ABORT=NORMal END)
  *****************************************************
  ABORT mode will terminate program execution.
  *****************************************************
  Program will stop immediately.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Best regards.


-------------------------------------
Masaki Unno, PhD.

Inst. of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials,
Tohoku University

2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8577, Japan
Tel: +22-217-5117
Fax: +22-217-5118

#1778 From: Laurie Betts <lab117+@...>
Date: Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:37 pm
Subject: Post-doctoral opportunities at University of PIttsburgh - NMR and X-ray Crystallography
lab117+@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Post-doctoral positions in macromolecular crystallography and NMR spectroscopy at the University of Pittsburgh in the Department of Structural Biology. There are several postdoctoral positions available immediately, with opportunities to work in projects related to Metabolic Membrane Proteins and to the Pittsburgh Center for HIV Protein Interactions (http://www2.structbio.pitt.edu/hivppi/site/index.php).  These positions are in the laboratory of Professors Angela M. Gronenborn (NMR/X-ray) and Joanne I. Yeh (Macromolecular X-ray crystallography).

 

The resources for X-ray Crystallography and NMR spectroscopy are outstanding. The X-ray Crystallography Facility includes automated crystallization screening and imaging, two high flux rotating anode generators, two CCD and two image plate detectors, and access to synchrotron time at SER-CAT; additional information can be found at (http://www2.structbio.pitt.edu/hivppi/site/cores_xray.php). The NMR facility (http://www.structbio.pitt.edu/drupal-5/?q=nmr) comprises of a total of six spectrometers dedicated to biological NMR. These include three 600 MHz spectrometers, 700 MHz, 800 MHz and 900 MHz spectrometers. All spectrometers are fully equipped with hardware for all modern multinuclear experiments including triple-axis gradients and the capability for multi-channel pulsing with deuterium decoupling. Cryoprobes have been installed at every field strength.

 

Candidates should have a Ph.D. in structural biology or related fields (Chemistry, Physics, Biochemistry, Biophysics, Molecular Biology); experience in biological NMR or macromolecular crystal structure determination, including protein crystallization, data collection/processing, structure determination and model refinement a plus. Please send your CV and the names and contact information for three references to Ms. Janet Zambotti (NMR) or Dr. Laurie Betts (X-ray crystallography) to the following e-mail address:

 

Janet Zambotti
Assistant to Angela M. Gronenborn
Department of Structural Biology
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
3501 Fifth Avenue, 1047 BST3
Pittsburgh, PA  15260
Telephone – 412/648-9866
Email – zambotti@...

Dr. Laurie Betts
X-ray Facility Manager
Department of Structural Biology
UNiversity of Pittsburgh
3501 Fifth Ave., 1047 BST3
Pittsburgh, PA
412-383-5839


#1779 From: "wgscott@..." <wgscott@...>
Date: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:39 am
Subject: I can no longer calculate phases in CNS
wgscott...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi citizens:

I haven't calculated SIR or MIR phases in CNS since upgrading from 1.1 to 1.2. 
Today I
tried calculating SIRAS phases for a demonstration RNA phasing tutorial I use
for my
research group.

Using CNS 1.1 and one Br RNA derivative, I could calculate beautiful, nearly
perfect 3Å
maps like this:

http://www.chemistry.ucsc.edu/%7Ewgscott/courses/chem200a/xtal_tutorial/map.jpg

Using CNS 1.2 (and then 1.21) the maps are completely uninterpretable.  The
Pattersons
look fine and the Br site is found readily.  But phasing somehow now goes
terribly wrong.

If I instead phase in CCP4's mlphare, and then solvent-flatten in CNS, the maps
look
decent (though not quite as good -- I used to use this to demonstrate solving
with 1
derivative in CNS worked better than with 2 derivatives in mlphare).

Was there a significant change in how (SIRAS or other) phases are calculated
between 1.1
and 1.2.x?  I'm using the new input file but am trying to keep everything else
constant. (I
also used the old one as a control -- same result).

I've been using cns on OS X intel, ppc, and linux, fwiw.

Thanks for any insight or suggestions.

Bill Scott

#1780 From: Xie Jiabao <xie.jiabao@...>
Date: Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:28 am
Subject: Map calculation in cns
xie.jiabao@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear all,

Are test reflections omitted while calculating electron density maps in cns?

Best regards,

Xie


#1781 From: Axel Brunger <brunger@...>
Date: Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:47 am
Subject: Re: Map calculation in cns
brunger@...
Send Email Send Email
 
All reflections (work+test sets) are included in the 
calculation of the map.  However, the sigmaA 
calculation uses the test set. 

Axel Brunger



On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:28 PM, Xie Jiabao wrote:


Dear all,

Are test reflections omitted while calculating electron density maps in cns?

Best regards,

Xie




#1782 From: Ed Pozharski <epozh001@...>
Date: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:19 pm
Subject: Re: Map calculation in cns
pozharski
Send Email Send Email
 
The other parameter you may consider is treatment of missing
reflections.  AFAIK, ccp4 maps substitute Fc for missing data.  True,
these days most people just load the mtz file in coot, but this follows
the same rule since it uses the FWT etc. columns, which are complete.
This may sound like a bad idea (BIAS!), but in fact it's better than
excluding those reflections (what are you doing by this is setting them
to zero - obviously wrong).

Fortunately, CNS has the fill_in parameter, although its default value
is false.  Consider setting it to true (I had one case when it was
absolutely necessary because of ice rings and severe map distortion due
to missing resolution shell).

On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 23:28 -0800, Xie Jiabao wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Are test reflections omitted while calculating electron density maps
> in cns?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Xie
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Edwin Pozharski, PhD, Assistant Professor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
----------------------------------------------
When the Way is forgotten duty and justice appear;
Then knowledge and wisdom are born along with hypocrisy.
When harmonious relationships dissolve then respect and devotion arise;
When a nation falls to chaos then loyalty and patriotism are born.
------------------------------   / Lao Tse /

#1783 From: Axel Brunger <brunger@...>
Date: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:34 pm
Subject: Re: Map calculation in cns
brunger@...
Send Email Send Email
 
All reflections (work+test sets) are included in the 
calculation of the map.  However, the sigmaA 
calculation uses the test set. 

Axel Brunger



On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:28 PM, Xie Jiabao wrote:


Dear all,

Are test reflections omitted while calculating electron density maps in cns?

Best regards,

Xie




#1784 From: Axel Brunger <brunger@...>
Date: Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:33 pm
Subject: Re: Map calculation in cns
brunger@...
Send Email Send Email
 
All reflections (work+test sets) are included in the 
calculation of the map.  However, the sigmaA 
calculation uses the test set. 

Axel Brunger



On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:28 PM, Xie Jiabao wrote:


Dear all,

Are test reflections omitted while calculating electron density maps in cns?

Best regards,

Xie





Axel T. Brunger
Investigator,  Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Professor of Molecular and Cellular Physiology
Stanford University

Email:  brunger@...      
Phone:  +1 650-736-1031
Fax:    +1 650-745-1463







#1785 From: Robert Sweet <sweet@...>
Date: Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:09 am
Subject: Only two weeks remain to apply for RapiData, the BNL Course on Synchrotron Data Collection and Structure Solving. Many positions remain.
sweet@...
Send Email Send Email
 
The application deadline is 8AM EST Monday 9 February for RapiData 2009,
the eleventh offering of our popular course:

Rapid Data Collection and Structure Solving at the NSLS: A Practical
Course in Macromolecular X-Ray Diffraction Measurement

The course will be held 19-24 April 2009. Students could be at any level from
advanced undergraduate to full professor. 48 students will be accepted; 24
will bring their own specimens for data collection. Please read the course
description at http://www.px.nsls.bnl.gov/RapiData2009/. You'll see that many
experts in the field will be available for lectures and tutorials, and you'll
find the application materials at this site.

For the seventh time we will hold a short lecture course on the fundamentals of
crystallography for roughly five hours on Sunday 19 April. The body of the
RapiData course really requires that students have a healthy knowledge of
crystallography. For potential students who have some experience but are shaky
about fundamentals, this course will help. There will be a small additional fee
for the fundamentals course, to pay for Saturday night accomodations and food
on Sunday morning and noon.

Latin American Scientists: Several scholarships are available, from the
International Union of Crystallography, to pay partial travel and subsistence
costs for Latin-American students and junior faculty. Please apply for the
course, and then contact R. Sweet (sweet@...) if you are interested in
applying for a scholarship. In accordance with the standards of the
International Union of Crystallography, we observe the basic policy of
non-discrimination, affirming the right and freedom of scientists to associate
in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as
citizenship, religion, creed, political stance, ethnic origin, race, colour,
language, age, or gender, in accordance with the Statutes of the International
Council for Science. At this course no barriers will exist beyond the
application procedure that would prevent the participation of bona fide
scientists.

Please apply or send your students to our course,

Alex Soares, Sal Sclafani, and Bob Sweet

=========================================================================
Robert M. Sweet E-Dress:              sweet@...
Group Leader, PXRR: Macromolecular            ^ (that's L
Crystallography Research Resource at NSLS          not 1)
http://px.nsls.bnl.gov/
Biology Dept
Brookhaven Nat'l Lab.           Phones:
Upton, NY 11973                    631 344 3401 (Office)
U.S.A.                             631 344 2741 (Facsimile)
=========================================================================

#1786 From: Craig Smith <boilerine@...>
Date: Sat Jan 24, 2009 11:21 pm
Subject: installing CNS on Dell Power Edge SC420; compiler problem
boilerine
Send Email Send Email
 
I'm trying to install CNS on a Dell 2.8GHz Pentium 4 HT Poweredge SC420
2 GB Unbuntu 8.10 Intrepid ibex.  I downloaded cns_solve_1.21 and moveed
it to my /usr/local/xtal/ directory.  I changed CNS_SOLVE to
'usr/local/xtal/cns_solve_env.' Then I typed 'make install' and get the
following error:

craig-desktop:/usr/local/xtal/cns_solve_1.21> make install
Installation directory: /usr/local/xtal/cns_solve_1.21/intel-i686-linux
copying files in instlib directory linux to intel-i686-linux
0read.me
arch_env
machine_c.c
machine_f.f
Makefile.header.1.ifort
Makefile.header.2.gfortran
Makefile.header.3.pgf95
Makefile.header.4.ifort_mp
Using Makefile template for compiler: gfortran
removing old source files
linking source files to intel-i686-linux/source
linking machine_f.f to source directory
linking machine_c.c to source directory
linking generic fft file to source directory
making Makefile in source directory
testing Fortran and C compilers
compiling: gcc -O -DCNS_ARCH_TYPE_LINUX
C compiler passes test
compiling: gfortran -w -O3 -malign-double -funroll-loops -ffast-math
linking: gfortran -w
Segmentation fault
***** ERROR: problem with Fortran compiler *****
make[3]: *** [fortran-test] Error 2
make[2]: *** [compiler-test] Error 2
make[1]: *** [compiler-test] Error 2
compiler problems - stopping installation
please check compilers before retrying installation
make: *** [install] Error 1

So it looks like I have a problem with my gfortran compiler but I don't
know how to proceed

#1787 From: Axel Brunger <brunger@...>
Date: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:24 pm
Subject: bug fix version of CNS 1.21
brunger@...
Send Email Send Email
 
A bug fix version of CNS 1.21 is available for download at http://cns-online.org/download/.
I made changes in the following files:

 modules/xtal/scaleftarget (also in http://cns-online.org/v1.21/ -> Modules )
 modules/xtal/scaleftarget2 (also in http://cns-online.org/v1.21/ -> Modules)

to fix the problem that BIll Scott reported.  The problem was related to scaling
between native and derivative data that only occurred for certain spacegroups 
in some circumstances.

You may just replace the two files in your version of CNS 1.21 or replace
the entire version.  The binaries have been compiled with the latest ifort
compiler versions on linux, and on mac OS X 10.5.6.

Axel Brunger


On Jan 20, 2009, at 4:39 PM, wgscott@... wrote:

Hi citizens:

I haven't calculated SIR or MIR phases in CNS since upgrading from 1.1 to 1.2. Today I 
tried calculating SIRAS phases for a demonstration RNA phasing tutorial I use for my 
research group.

Using CNS 1.1 and one Br RNA derivative, I could calculate beautiful, nearly perfect 3Å 
maps like this:

http://www.chemistry.ucsc.edu/%7Ewgscott/courses/chem200a/xtal_tutorial/map.jpg

Using CNS 1.2 (and then 1.21) the maps are completely uninterpretable. The Pattersons 
look fine and the Br site is found readily. But phasing somehow now goes terribly wrong.

If I instead phase in CCP4's mlphare, and then solvent-flatten in CNS, the maps look 
decent (though not quite as good -- I used to use this to demonstrate solving with 1
derivative in CNS worked better than with 2 derivatives in mlphare).

Was there a significant change in how (SIRAS or other) phases are calculated between 1.1 
and 1.2.x? I'm using the new input file but am trying to keep everything else constant. (I 
also used the old one as a control -- same result).

I've been using cns on OS X intel, ppc, and linux, fwiw.

Thanks for any insight or suggestions.

Bill Scott


.
 

Axel T. Brunger
Investigator,  Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Professor of Molecular and Cellular Physiology
Stanford University

Email:  brunger@...      
Phone:  +1 650-736-1031
Fax:    +1 650-745-1463







#1788 From: Axel Brunger <brunger@...>
Date: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:44 am
Subject: Re: installing CNS on Dell Power Edge SC420; compiler problem
brunger@...
Send Email Send Email
 


Begin forwarded message:

From: Craig Smith <boilerine@...>
Date: January 25, 2009 7:23:13 PM PST
To: Axel Brunger <brunger@...>
Subject: Re: [cnsbb] installing CNS on Dell Power Edge SC420; compiler problem

I just downloaded the pre-compiled binaries and they seem to work.  Thanks

Craig

On Jan 25, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Axel Brunger wrote:

Are the pre-compiled binaries working on your linux system by 
any chance?  Just download the precompiled mac-linux
file and don't run the "Install" command.  Just edit the cns_solve_env
to set the correct path.

Axel Brunger

On Jan 24, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Craig Smith wrote:

I'm trying to install CNS on a Dell 2.8GHz Pentium 4 HT Poweredge SC420
2 GB Unbuntu 8.10 Intrepid ibex. I downloaded cns_solve_1.21 and moveed
it to my /usr/local/xtal/ directory. I changed CNS_SOLVE to
'usr/local/xtal/cns_solve_env.' Then I typed 'make install' and get the
following error:

craig-desktop:/usr/local/xtal/cns_solve_1.21> make install
Installation directory: /usr/local/xtal/cns_solve_1.21/intel-i686-linux
copying files in instlib directory linux to intel-i686-linux
0read.me
arch_env
machine_c.c
machine_f.f
Makefile.header.1.ifort
Makefile.header.2.gfortran
Makefile.header.3.pgf95
Makefile.header.4.ifort_mp
Using Makefile template for compiler: gfortran
removing old source files
linking source files to intel-i686-linux/source
linking machine_f.f to source directory
linking machine_c.c to source directory
linking generic fft file to source directory
making Makefile in source directory
testing Fortran and C compilers
compiling: gcc -O -DCNS_ARCH_TYPE_LINUX 
C compiler passes test
compiling: gfortran -w -O3 -malign-double -funroll-loops -ffast-math 
linking: gfortran -w 
Segmentation fault
***** ERROR: problem with Fortran compiler *****
make[3]: *** [fortran-test] Error 2
make[2]: *** [compiler-test] Error 2
make[1]: *** [compiler-test] Error 2
compiler problems - stopping installation
please check compilers before retrying installation
make: *** [install] Error 1

So it looks like I have a problem with my gfortran compiler but I don't
know how to proceed


Axel T. Brunger
Investigator,  Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Professor of Molecular and Cellular Physiology
Stanford University

Email:  brunger@...      
Phone:  +1 650-736-1031
Fax:    +1 650-745-1463








Axel T. Brunger
Investigator,  Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Professor of Molecular and Cellular Physiology
Stanford University

Email:  brunger@...      
Phone:  +1 650-736-1031
Fax:    +1 650-745-1463







#1789 From: Laurie Betts <lab117+@...>
Date: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:28 pm
Subject: installation problem
lab117+@...
Send Email Send Email
 
I am trying to install cns version 1.1 (don't ask) on a 64-bit Linux
(AMD) machine running CENTOS.  When I downloaded
the general tar file and then tried to run make install (after source
the cns_solve_env) got the following

sed: -e expression #1, char 11: Invalid range end
the architecture of the machine is unknown - CNS_ARCH=unknown-x86_64-
Linux

What else do I need to do?

THanks


Laurie Betts
University of Pittsburgh
X-ray Crystallography Facility Manager
Department of Structural Biology
3501 Fifth Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
412-383-5839
lab117@...

#1790 From: Robert Sweet <sweet@...>
Date: Mon Feb 2, 2009 11:14 am
Subject: Barely one week remains to apply for RapiData, the BNL Course on Synchrotron Data Collection and Structure Solving.
sweet@...
Send Email Send Email
 
The application deadline is 8AM EST Monday 9 February for RapiData 2009,
the eleventh offering of our popular course:

Rapid Data Collection and Structure Solving at the NSLS: A Practical
Course in Macromolecular X-Ray Diffraction Measurement

The course will be held 19-24 April 2009. Students could be at any level
from advanced undergraduate to full professor. 48 students will be
accepted; 24 will bring their own specimens for data collection. Please
read the course description at http://www.px.nsls.bnl.gov/RapiData2009/.
You'll see that many experts in the field will be available for lectures
and tutorials, and you'll find the application materials at this site.

For the seventh time we will hold a short lecture course on the fundamentals of
crystallography for roughly five hours on Sunday 19 April. The body of the
RapiData course really requires that students have a healthy knowledge of
crystallography. For potential students who have some experience but are shaky
about fundamentals, this course will help. There will be a small additional fee
for the fundamentals course, to pay for Saturday night accomodations and food
on Sunday morning and noon.

Latin American Scientists: Several scholarships are available, from the
International Union of Crystallography, to pay partial travel and subsistence
costs for Latin-American students and junior faculty. Please apply for the
course, and then contact R. Sweet (sweet@...) if you are interested in
applying for a scholarship. In accordance with the standards of the
International Union of Crystallography, we observe the basic policy of
non-discrimination, affirming the right and freedom of scientists to associate
in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as
citizenship, religion, creed, political stance, ethnic origin, race, colour,
language, age, or gender, in accordance with the Statutes of the International
Council for Science. At this course no barriers will exist beyond the
application procedure that would prevent the participation of bona fide
scientists.

Please apply or send your students to our course,

Alex Soares, Sal Sclafani, and Bob Sweet

=========================================================================
Robert M. Sweet E-Dress:              sweet@...
Group Leader, PXRR: Macromolecular            ^ (that's L
Crystallography Research Resource at NSLS          not 1)
http://px.nsls.bnl.gov/
Biology Dept
Brookhaven Nat'l Lab.           Phones:
Upton, NY 11973                    631 344 3401 (Office)
U.S.A.                             631 344 2741 (Facsimile)
=========================================================================

#1791 From: "lawsond94" <lawsond94@...>
Date: Thu Feb 5, 2009 10:32 am
Subject: energy mimimization of Mg2+ bound to protein
lawsond94
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear cnsbb,

I am trying to energy minimize a structure to which I have manually
added a Mg2+ ion (I have ensured that the Mg has a 2+ charge). I have
successfully run generate.inp and minimize.inp (with wa=0), but most
of the resultant distances between the Mg2+ and it's neighbours (3
Asps and 3 waters) are too long (2.4 - 2.9 Ang). I was wondering if I
could specifically restrain these distances, but I am struggling to
find an example of how to do it.

Any help much appreciated.

Dave Lawson

-------------------------------

Dr. David M. Lawson
Biological Chemistry Dept.,
John Innes Centre,
Norwich,
NR4 7UH, UK.
Tel: +44-(0)1603-450725
Fax: +44-(0)1603-450018
Email: david.lawson@...
Web: http://www.jic.bbsrc.ac.uk/staff/david-lawson/index.htm

#1792 From: "Mark A. White" <white@...>
Date: Thu Feb 5, 2009 8:09 pm
Subject: Re: energy mimimization of Mg2+ bound to protein
white@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Dave,

CNS has the ability to apply several types of distance restraints.  NMR spectroscopists use the known hydrogen bonding geometry to restrain their NMR models. Crystallographers can also use the same CNS formalism to add Hydrogen bond or other bond distance restraints.  Here is an example file generated using PMB (http://xray.utmb.edu/PMB).

The important question is, do you really want to restrain this distance if the electron density  is telling you something different from what you expect to see.

The bond restraints are placed in a DEF file, read in by the minimize.inp script.  The individual bond restraints are given by the assign command, for each pair of atoms:
assign (segid A and resid  314 and name N) (segid A and resid  310 and name O) 2.90  0.4  0.7
ASSIGN ( "FIRST ATOM SELECTION") ( "SECOND ATOM SELECTION") "BOND_DISTANCE"  "Potential lower sigma" "Potential upper sigma"

The Potential upper and lower sigma values give the asymmetric width of the bi-harmonic potential, and approximate the valley of the Lenard-Jones potential.  The strength of the bond restraint is given in the DEF file header by the "scale hres" parameter.  You will probably just want to specify your bond-pair and the BOND_DISTANCE. To make the bond distance more stringent, increase the "SCALE HRES" factor to ~1000, and/or reduce the bond sigma values.

pmb_hbonds.def
{# THIS FILE IS AUTOGENERATED BY PMB_HONDS -DO NOT EDIT  #}
{# Enter additional bond restraints in PMB_MY_HBONDS.INP #}
{# This file is called in PMB_PARAM.INP - Comment out    #}
{# The PMB_HBOND line to remove restraints               #}

flags include noe end
{# NOE HBOND PARAMETERS #}
noe
   nres=1000
   class hres
   ceiling=1000
   averaging hres cent

   {* potential hres softsquare
   sqconstant hres 1.
   sqexponent hres 2 *}

   potential hres biharmonic
   scale hres 75
end
{# NOE HBOND LIST #}
NOE
set message=off echo=off end
assign (segid A and resid  314 and name N) (segid A and resid  310 and name O) 2.90  0.4  0.7 !#PDB 2.79   126    17
assign (segid R and resid  164 and name N) (segid R and resid  160 and name O) 2.90  0.4  0.7 !#PDB 2.89   143     0

{# USER DEFINED BONDS FROM PMB_MY_HBONDS.INP #}

set message=on echo=on end
END


In minimize.inp:

1) Add the input filename to the "EDIT THIS" section at the top
{PMB_HBOND===>} pmb_hbond_infile="pmb_hbonds.def";

2) Read in the DEF file in the body of minimize.inp (before "do (store9=0) (all)")

if ( &BLANK%pmb_hbond_infile = false ) then
     @&pmb_hbond_infile
end if


Best regards,

Mark


On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 04:32 -0600, lawsond94 wrote:
Dear cnsbb,

I am trying to energy minimize a structure to which I have manually
added a Mg2+ ion (I have ensured that the Mg has a 2+ charge). I have
successfully run generate.inp and minimize.inp (with wa=0), but most
of the resultant distances between the Mg2+ and it's neighbours (3
Asps and 3 waters) are too long (2.4 - 2.9 Ang). I was wondering if I
could specifically restrain these distances, but I am struggling to
find an example of how to do it.

Any help much appreciated.

Dave Lawson

-------------------------------

Dr. David M. Lawson
Biological Chemistry Dept.,
John Innes Centre,
Norwich,
NR4 7UH, UK.
Tel: +44-(0)1603-450725
Fax: +44-(0)1603-450018
Email: david.lawson@bbsrc.ac.uk
Web: http://www.jic.bbsrc.ac.uk/staff/david-lawson/index.htm






Yours sincerely,

Mark A. White, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor, Dept. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
Manager, Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics X-ray Crystallography Laboratory,
Basic Science Building, Room 6.660 C
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, TX 77555-0647
Tel. (409) 747-4747
Cell. (409) 539-9138
Fax. (409) 747-4745
mailto://white@...
http://xray.utmb.edu
http://xray.utmb.edu/~white




#1793 From: "vgloyd" <vgloyd@...>
Date: Fri Feb 6, 2009 11:45 pm
Subject: naming glutamine and arginine
vgloyd
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi all,
I am new to this group, so sorry if I am repeating somethings. I
cannot figure out how to name glutamine He21 and He22 (IUPAC) so CNS
will recognize the atom. Same problem with arginine Hh11/12/21/22. I
have tried # and * and get nowhere.
I would appreciate any help.
Thanks,
Vicki

#1794 From: "Mark A. White" <white@...>
Date: Mon Feb 9, 2009 3:41 pm
Subject: Re: naming glutamine and arginine
white@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Vicki,

Look in the $CNS_TOPPAR/protein-allhdg.top  or which ever topology file you are sourcing in your CNS input file.  You seem to be using ALL Hydrogens, so here the the RESIDUE entry from that file.  Be careful with the PDB column alignment, although COOT or O or Xtalview should produce the correct alignment.


Good luck,

Mark

$CNS_TOPPAR/protein-allhdg.top
residue ARG
  group
    atom N    type=NH1  charge=-0.36 end
    atom HN   type=H    charge= 0.26 end
    atom CA   type=CH1E   charge= 0.00 end
    atom HA   type=HA   charge= 0.10 end
    atom CB   type=CH2E   charge=-0.20 end
    atom HB1  type=HA   charge= 0.10 end
    atom HB2  type=HA   charge= 0.10 end
    atom CG   type=CH2E   charge=-0.20 end
    atom HG1  type=HA   charge= 0.10 end
    atom HG2  type=HA   charge= 0.10 end
    atom CD   type=CH2E   charge=-0.10 end
    atom HD1  type=HA   charge= 0.15 end
    atom HD2  type=HA   charge= 0.15 end
    atom NE   type=NH1  charge=-0.60 end
    atom HE   type=H    charge= 0.40 end
    atom CZ   type=C    charge= 0.60 end
    atom NH1  type=NC2  charge=-0.60 end
    atom HH11 type=HC   charge= 0.40 end
    atom HH12 type=HC   charge= 0.40 end
    atom NH2   type=NC2 charge=-0.60 end
    atom HH21  type=HC  charge= 0.40 end
    atom HH22  type=HC  charge= 0.40 end
    atom C     type=C   charge= 0.48 end
    atom O     type=O   charge=-0.48 end





On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:45 -0600, vgloyd wrote:
Hi all,
I am new to this group, so sorry if I am repeating somethings. I
cannot figure out how to name glutamine He21 and He22 (IUPAC) so CNS
will recognize the atom. Same problem with arginine Hh11/12/21/22. I
have tried # and * and get nowhere.
I would appreciate any help.
Thanks,
Vicki





Yours sincerely,

Mark A. White, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor, Dept. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
Manager, Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics X-ray Crystallography Laboratory,
Basic Science Building, Room 6.660 C
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, TX 77555-0647
Tel. (409) 747-4747
Cell. (409) 539-9138
Fax. (409) 747-4745
mailto://white@...
http://xray.utmb.edu
http://xray.utmb.edu/~white



#1795 From: Tiancen Hu <tony_cns@...>
Date: Thu Mar 5, 2009 5:56 am
Subject: CNS1.1 on OS X 10.5.6
htc2001_cn
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear all,

Could someone advise me how to install CNS1.1 on Mac (intel) OS X
10.5.6? I searched the CNSBB archive and downloaded a version from
Logan Donaldson, but the binary could not work.

I wanted to install CNS1.1 because COOT can convert the two
coefficient files generated by model_map.inp into MTZ file. But these
two files are not produced by CNS1.2. Is there any way to fulfill the
same function using CNS1.2?

Thanks in advance!

Tiancen
Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica
Chinese Academy of Sciences

#1796 From: jbauer6@...
Date: Thu Mar 5, 2009 7:40 am
Subject: issues with compiling cns 1.21 using gfortran 4.3
jbauer6...
Send Email Send Email
 
For those who are having difficulty compiling cns v. 1.21 under Linux using gfortran 4.3 (fortran compiler fails test):

The problem seems to be the -malign-double switch. The documentation for gcc says that binary files compiled with this switch may not be compatible with those compiled without it (and probably won't link). Mine wasn't and it's quite possible that others also were not.. Here are three possible solutions:

1. Use the binary if you can (probably the best solution)
2. Drop the -malign-double switch. You can do this by editing

$CNS_SOLVE/instlib/machine/supported/linux/arch_env

and commenting out lines 27-30:

#
# set -malign-double flag on intel-based machines
#
#setenv CNS_MALIGN_I86 ""
#if ( $CNS_ARCH =~ *-i[3456789]86-* ) then
#  setenv CNS_MALIGN_I86 "-malign-double"
#endif
#

Then run make install and things should work, hopefully. This will solve the compiler test problem on i686 processors, but not x64 ones.

3. Or you could re-compile the gfortran libraries using the -malign-double switch. I haven't bothered to do this, so I don't know how well it would work out.

-malign-double is supposed to give a small performance boost on Pentium processors at the expense of using more memory. Removing it may make CNS run more slowly, but probably won't affect anything else. After dropping this switch, CNS successfully compiled and linked. My installation passed all of the tests, but did run more slowly (on an older and slower computer with a rather small amount of memory) than Dr. Brunger's.

Hope this helps,

Jacob Bauer



#1797 From: "nathan.thomsen" <thomsend@...>
Date: Mon Mar 2, 2009 6:12 pm
Subject: problems with composite omit maps
nathan.thomsen
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi everyone, this is my first post on the CNS bulletin board.  Thanks in advance
for any help!

I am currently having a problem with composite omit maps in cns version 1.2.  I
have
previously used these with much success on different structures.  My current
structure is in
spacegroup P1.  The maps that CNS gives me contain "normal" looking regions as
well as
regions of dramatically reduced and spotty density.  The problem areas have
density similar
to the solvent regions.  These regions appear to be separated by straight lines
that look
something like unit cell edges/angles.  I have edited the cns .inp file to make
the map over
my pdb as well as over my asymmetric unit and the same thing happens in either
case.  I also
converted the map coefficients into a format readable by coot using sftools and
the same
thing happened.  This leads me to believe that the error is not in how the map
is
drawn/calculated but is something more fundamental.  I have checked and
rechecked my .inp
files and downloaded and edited new .inp files from the cns website, but the
same thing
happens every time.  Any ideas?

Thanks!

Nathan Thomsen
Graduate Student
UC Berkeley

#1798 From: Boaz Shaanan <bshaanan@...>
Date: Thu Mar 5, 2009 1:39 pm
Subject: Re: issues with compiling cns 1.21 using gfortran 4.3
boaz_shaanan
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi,

The best solution (it's Axel's advice) is to use the intel compiler. It worked like a charm for me.
            Boaz
----- Original Message -----
From: jbauer6@...
Date: Thursday, March 5, 2009 9:46
Subject: [cnsbb] issues with compiling cns 1.21 using gfortran 4.3
To: cnsbb@yahoogroups.com

> For those who are having difficulty compiling cns v. 1.21 under
> Linux using gfortran 4.3 (fortran compiler fails test):
>
> The problem seems to be the -malign-double switch. The
> documentation for gcc says that binary files compiled with this
> switch may not be compatible with those compiled without it (and
> probably won't link). Mine wasn't and it's quite possible that
> others also were not. Here are three possible solutions:
>
> 1. Use the binary if you can (probably the best solution)
> 2. Drop the -malign-double switch. You can do this by editing
>
> $CNS_SOLVE/instlib/machine/supported/linux/arch_env
>
> and commenting out lines 27-30:
>
> #
> # set -malign-double flag on intel-based machines
> #
> #setenv CNS_MALIGN_I86 ""
> #if ( $CNS_ARCH =~ *-i[3456789]86-* ) then
> #  setenv CNS_MALIGN_I86 "-malign-double"
> #endif
> #
>
> Then run make install and things should work, hopefully. This
> will solve the compiler test problem on i686 processors, but not
> x64 ones.
>
> 3. Or you could re-compile the gfortran libraries using the -
> malign-double switch. I haven't bothered to do this, so I don't
> know how well it would work out.
>
> -malign-double is supposed to give a small performance boost on
> Pentium processors at the expense of using more memory. Removing
> it may make CNS run more slowly, but probably won't affect
> anything else. After dropping this switch, CNS successfully
> compiled and linked. My installation passed all of the tests,
> but did run more slowly (on an older and slower computer with a
> rather small amount of memory) than Dr. Brunger's.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Jacob Bauer
>
>
>
>
>      

Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.
Dept. of Life Sciences
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Beer-Sheva 84105
Israel
Phone: 972-8-647-2220 ; Fax: 646-1710
Skype: boaz.shaanan

‎

#1799 From: Ed Pozharski <epozh001@...>
Date: Thu Mar 5, 2009 3:16 pm
Subject: Re: issues with compiling cns 1.21 using gfortran 4.3
pozharski
Send Email Send Email
 
Except that ifort costs $900 (academic price is $360, and academic use
does *not* qualify for non-commercial software development).  You can
get around it once by using an evaluation copy, but it only works for 30
days, so one will be out of luck when the next version of CNS is
released.

It would be nice if Intel would give ifort away for free (after all,
they are not a software company and how much is fortran used these days
anyway), but they don't.  By the way, does gfortran compilation work on
amd machines?  I guess amd binaries will then run on intel processors,
but will be similarly slower compared to ifort version.

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 13:39 +0000, Boaz Shaanan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The best solution (it's Axel's advice) is to use the intel compiler.
> It worked like a charm for me.
>             Boaz
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: jbauer6@...
> Date: Thursday, March 5, 2009 9:46
> Subject: [cnsbb] issues with compiling cns 1.21 using gfortran 4.3
> To: cnsbb@yahoogroups.com
>
> > For those who are having difficulty compiling cns v. 1.21 under
> > Linux using gfortran 4.3 (fortran compiler fails test):
> >
> > The problem seems to be the -malign-double switch. The
> > documentation for gcc says that binary files compiled with this
> > switch may not be compatible with those compiled without it (and
> > probably won't link). Mine wasn't and it's quite possible that
> > others also were not. Here are three possible solutions:
> >
> > 1. Use the binary if you can (probably the best solution)
> > 2. Drop the -malign-double switch. You can do this by editing
> >
> > $CNS_SOLVE/instlib/machine/supported/linux/arch_env
> >
> > and commenting out lines 27-30:
> >
> > #
> > # set -malign-double flag on intel-based machines
> > #
> > #setenv CNS_MALIGN_I86 ""
> > #if ( $CNS_ARCH =~ *-i[3456789]86-* ) then
> > #  setenv CNS_MALIGN_I86 "-malign-double"
> > #endif
> > #
> >
> > Then run make install and things should work, hopefully. This
> > will solve the compiler test problem on i686 processors, but not
> > x64 ones.
> >
> > 3. Or you could re-compile the gfortran libraries using the -
> > malign-double switch. I haven't bothered to do this, so I don't
> > know how well it would work out.
> >
> > -malign-double is supposed to give a small performance boost on
> > Pentium processors at the expense of using more memory. Removing
> > it may make CNS run more slowly, but probably won't affect
> > anything else. After dropping this switch, CNS successfully
> > compiled and linked. My installation passed all of the tests,
> > but did run more slowly (on an older and slower computer with a
> > rather small amount of memory) than Dr. Brunger's.
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> >
> > Jacob Bauer
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.
> Dept. of Life Sciences
> Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
> Beer-Sheva 84105
> Israel
> Phone: 972-8-647-2220 ; Fax: 646-1710
> Skype: boaz.shaanan
>
> ‎
>
>
>
--
Edwin Pozharski, PhD, Assistant Professor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
----------------------------------------------
When the Way is forgotten duty and justice appear;
Then knowledge and wisdom are born along with hypocrisy.
When harmonious relationships dissolve then respect and devotion arise;
When a nation falls to chaos then loyalty and patriotism are born.
------------------------------   / Lao Tse /

#1800 From: Axel Brunger <brunger@...>
Date: Thu Mar 5, 2009 3:59 pm
Subject: Re: issues with compiling cns 1.21 using gfortran 4.3
brunger@...
Send Email Send Email
 
I suggest you use the pre-compiled binaries from the CNS download site,
version 1.21.  No compilation is needed.  

Axel Brunger

On Mar 4, 2009, at 11:40 PM, jbauer6@... wrote:


For those who are having difficulty compiling cns v. 1.21 under Linux using gfortran 4.3 (fortran compiler fails test): 

The problem seems to be the -malign-double switch. The documentation for gcc says that binary files compiled with this switch may not be compatible with those compiled without it (and probably won't link). Mine wasn't and it's quite possible that others also were not.. Here are three possible solutions:

1. Use the binary if you can (probably the best solution)
2. Drop the -malign-double switch. You can do this by editing

$CNS_SOLVE/instlib/machine/supported/linux/arch_env

and commenting out lines 27-30:

#
# set -malign-double flag on intel-based machines
#
#setenv CNS_MALIGN_I86 ""
#if ( $CNS_ARCH =~ *-i[3456789]86-* ) then
#  setenv CNS_MALIGN_I86 "-malign-double"
#endif
#

Then run make install and things should work, hopefully. This will solve the compiler test problem on i686 processors, but not x64 ones.

3. Or you could re-compile the gfortran libraries using the -malign-double switch. I haven't bothered to do this, so I don't know how well it would work out.

-malign-double is supposed to give a small performance boost on Pentium processors at the expense of using more memory. Removing it may make CNS run more slowly, but probably won't affect anything else. After dropping this switch, CNS successfully compiled and linked. My installation passed all of the tests, but did run more slowly (on an older and slower computer with a rather small amount of memory) than Dr. Brunger's.

Hope this helps,

Jacob Bauer




Axel T. Brunger
Investigator,  Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Professor of Molecular and Cellular Physiology
Stanford University

Email:  brunger@...      
Phone:  +1 650-736-1031
Fax:    +1 650-745-1463







#1801 From: "simonekosol" <simonekosol@...>
Date: Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:28 am
Subject: problems with NMR carbonshift syntax
simonekosol
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi everyone,
I tried to use alpha and beta carbon shifts for structure calculation with cns
1.1, but it seems the syntax of my file is incorrect. I already looked it up in
the syntax manual on the cns homepage but it still doesn't work. Maybe someone
can give me an example how the syntax should look like?
Thanks a lot!
Simone

#1802 From: "Konstantin Berlin" <kberlin@...>
Date: Fri Apr 3, 2009 2:47 pm
Subject: CNS on GPU
cberlin
Send Email Send Email
 
Has anyone looked at the possibility of paralleling CNS for a GPU (NVIDIA CUDA
specifically)?

Messages 1773 - 1802 of 2225   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help