Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
comets-ml · Comets Mailing List
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Moderator's absence   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #11264 of 16102 |
A word of caution to P1 observers

Having just looked through recently reported magnitudes for C/2006 P1
appearing on the ICQ website and elsewhere, I think a word of caution
is in order. The range in reported magnitudes is becoming
extraordinarily large and some infer very dramatic day-to-day
increases taking place over the last couple of days.

Under normal circumstances, one would not expect the comet's apparent
magnitude at this time to be increasing by more than a few tenths of
a magnitude per day and, in fact, it should be just about leveling
off with perihelion only two days away. Likewise, any forward-
scattering effects should probably not yet have become very apparent,
so I have to wonder if perhaps some observers are not simply getting
a bit carried away. Admittedly, I haven't seen the comet myself since
Monday but based on very long experience in observing comets, I find
it difficult to accept some of what I'm seeing reported.

Since C/2006 P1 offers the almost unique opportunity to document a
possible forward-scattering event, observers need to make every
effort to report m1 values of the greatest possible accuracy, even
given the difficult circumstances under which the comet must be
observed. Simply going by "impression" or by adjusting magnitude for
extinction factors amounting to 4 and 5 magnitudes, make such
brightness estimates of little scientific value.

JBortle




Wed Jan 10, 2007 1:10 pm

cnj999
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #11264 of 16102 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Dear all, I will be on business travel between Wednesday 05:00 UT and Thursday 22:00 UT. During this time I will only be occasionally able to approve moderated...
Maik Meyer
maiki666
Offline Send Email
Jan 9, 2007
7:46 pm

... Maik, I still have not seen the comet, though I have come so close [I have been in Seattle, Washington, USA for the American Astronomical Society meeting...
Brian Cudnik
brian_cudnik
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2007
5:36 am

Hi Brian, ... well, bad luck this morning: When I started from home at 5 a.m. the sky cleared but I had to be at 9 a.m. at the place of the ISO meeting (where ...
Maik Meyer
maiki666
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2007
8:09 am

Maik, Can't you arrange some urgent business in Australia? Regards, Jim Gifford. _____ From: comets-ml@yahoogroups.com [mailto:comets-ml@yahoogroups.com] On ...
JS & EJ Gifford
jsg388
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2007
10:54 am

Having just looked through recently reported magnitudes for C/2006 P1 appearing on the ICQ website and elsewhere, I think a word of caution is in order. The...
cnj999
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2007
1:12 pm

Hi Jon. I can to say that yesterday I saw the comet clearly to naked eyes despite weather condition was not good since the two previous evenings. Seem really...
Toni Scarmato
toniscarmato...
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2007
1:32 pm

Dear John, I have to agree with Toni here: the fact that several observers are currently reporting the obvious visibility of this comet in broad daylight,...
gvnn64@...
gvnn64
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2007
2:29 pm

There is indeed always that possibility....also there are many, many experienced observers reporting and imaging brightness increases in this comet. John 's...
P. Clay Sherrod
drclay2002
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2007
2:44 pm

Before this degenerates into an "Yes it is, No it isn't" situation, let me offer something of a guide to the visibility of comet-like objects in the daytime,...
cnj999
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2007
3:33 pm

... Useful guidelines. I've just come in from searching for P1 with a set of "Oberwerk-style" 45 degree 25x100 binoculars, alt-az tripod-mounted, without...
David Nicholls
dcnicholls
Offline Send Email
Jan 11, 2007
5:19 am

... John, the problem here is that the nice table you posted is based solely on visual impressions, i.e. very subjective, according to experience of the...
gvnn64@...
gvnn64
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2007
4:14 pm

... Possible science aside, why do we need more than that? Greg -- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)...
Greg Crinklaw
theskyhound
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2007
4:50 pm

... Hi Greg, no problem from me: I was not the one blaming against the data scatter of current visual observations... Cheers, Giovanni ... Passa a Infostrada....
gvnn64@...
gvnn64
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2007
5:09 pm

Amen.....just as it has been for decades. There are going to be errors in reports and scattering of estimates. Clay ... Dr. P. Clay Sherrod Arkansas Sky...
P. Clay Sherrod
drclay2002
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2007
6:37 pm

Jim, ... I wish I could! But since the company I work for has an agent in Australia I guess the prospects are not so good.. ;) Well, at least I had Hyakutake...
Maik Meyer
maiki666
Offline Send Email
Jan 11, 2007
5:01 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help