Having just looked through recently reported magnitudes for C/2006 P1
appearing on the ICQ website and elsewhere, I think a word of caution
is in order. The range in reported magnitudes is becoming
extraordinarily large and some infer very dramatic day-to-day
increases taking place over the last couple of days.
Under normal circumstances, one would not expect the comet's apparent
magnitude at this time to be increasing by more than a few tenths of
a magnitude per day and, in fact, it should be just about leveling
off with perihelion only two days away. Likewise, any forward-
scattering effects should probably not yet have become very apparent,
so I have to wonder if perhaps some observers are not simply getting
a bit carried away. Admittedly, I haven't seen the comet myself since
Monday but based on very long experience in observing comets, I find
it difficult to accept some of what I'm seeing reported.
Since C/2006 P1 offers the almost unique opportunity to document a
possible forward-scattering event, observers need to make every
effort to report m1 values of the greatest possible accuracy, even
given the difficult circumstances under which the comet must be
observed. Simply going by "impression" or by adjusting magnitude for
extinction factors amounting to 4 and 5 magnitudes, make such
brightness estimates of little scientific value.
Dear all, I will be on business travel between Wednesday 05:00 UT and Thursday 22:00 UT. During this time I will only be occasionally able to approve moderated...
... Maik, I still have not seen the comet, though I have come so close [I have been in Seattle, Washington, USA for the American Astronomical Society meeting...
Hi Brian, ... well, bad luck this morning: When I started from home at 5 a.m. the sky cleared but I had to be at 9 a.m. at the place of the ISO meeting (where ...
Maik, Can't you arrange some urgent business in Australia? Regards, Jim Gifford. _____ From: comets-ml@yahoogroups.com [mailto:comets-ml@yahoogroups.com] On ...
Having just looked through recently reported magnitudes for C/2006 P1 appearing on the ICQ website and elsewhere, I think a word of caution is in order. The...
Hi Jon. I can to say that yesterday I saw the comet clearly to naked eyes despite weather condition was not good since the two previous evenings. Seem really...
Dear John, I have to agree with Toni here: the fact that several observers are currently reporting the obvious visibility of this comet in broad daylight,...
There is indeed always that possibility....also there are many, many experienced observers reporting and imaging brightness increases in this comet. John 's...
Before this degenerates into an "Yes it is, No it isn't" situation, let me offer something of a guide to the visibility of comet-like objects in the daytime,...
... Useful guidelines. I've just come in from searching for P1 with a set of "Oberwerk-style" 45 degree 25x100 binoculars, alt-az tripod-mounted, without...
... John, the problem here is that the nice table you posted is based solely on visual impressions, i.e. very subjective, according to experience of the...
... Possible science aside, why do we need more than that? Greg -- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)...
... Hi Greg, no problem from me: I was not the one blaming against the data scatter of current visual observations... Cheers, Giovanni ... Passa a Infostrada....
Amen.....just as it has been for decades. There are going to be errors in reports and scattering of estimates. Clay ... Dr. P. Clay Sherrod Arkansas Sky...
Jim, ... I wish I could! But since the company I work for has an agent in Australia I guess the prospects are not so good.. ;) Well, at least I had Hyakutake...