Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
comis · Multizone Infiltration Modelling
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
SV: [comis] Link height of vertical duct   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #290 of 862 |
Dear yun,
- duct_1 looks OK.  You will nevertheless get a ***CER***NOTE mentioning duct_1's vertical 3m shaft.
- duct_2 should have Height_to = 11 m.
- crack_1 is OK if you intend to model a vertical leakage pathway from room1 (2 m above the floor in room1) to room2 (2 m above the floor in room2).
- A definition of Height_from and Height_to is given on pages 98-100 of the COMIS 3.1 User's Guide, and in the bubble help-text in COMISexcel.
- Below is a description of Height_from, Height_to, and Own_height_factor, based on the help-text in COMISexcel:
 
Height_from and Height_to are simply the height of each end of the link above the reference plane of the two connected zones.
 
Thus, Height_from and Height_to are the same unless:
- the two connected zones have different reference plane heights (e.g. a crack in outer wall of a 2nd floor room),
- or when the link has a vertical component (e.g. vertical shaft).
 
e.g. For an outside window:
Height_from would be the height between the external node reference plane (i.e. ground level) and the window, and
Height_to would be the height difference between the window and the inside zone reference plane (i.e. floor level).
 
Own_height_factor has a misleading name; it is in fact only relevant for slanted windows/doors (e.g. in a pitched roof).  In COMISexcel, the name has been corrected to Window_tilt_factor. However, even for links that are not tilted windows/doors this column SHOULD NOT BE EMPTY, even though it is not relevant.  Type for example "d" for default, or "1"The Own_height_factor (Window_tilt_factor) is the SIN of the tilt angle of the window's facade relative to horizontal, e.g.
 
e.g.
Vertical wall (SIN 90°)  :  Tilt_factor = 1.0  (default)
45° roof (SIN 45°)  :  Tilt_factor = 0.71
Flat roof (SIN 0°)  :  Tilt_factor = 0.0
 
Kind regards,
Peter
 
-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: comisyun [mailto:comisyun@...]
Sendt: 12. desember 2003 02:38
Til: comis@yahoogroups.com
Emne: [comis] Link height of vertical duct


Dear COMIS users

I am struggling with understanding the definition about link height
of vertical duct.

For example,
There are three rooms (H:3, D:5, W:5) in a row vertically.
Therefore the reference heights of room1, room2, room3 are 0, 3,
6m respectively.
I want to install 2 ducts like the followings;
duct1 : any diameter, length:3m, linking the ceiling of room1
and floor of room3.
duct2 : any diameter, length:2m, projected from the ceiling of
room3 like a stack

Then, what values are desirable for the description of each duct?
That is, "Height from", "Height to", "Own height factor".

If I entered <Height from :3, Height to :0, Own height factor:1>
for duct1
and <Height from :3, Height to :2, Own height factor:1> for
duct2 then the error messages were shown from cof file like the
followings.

***CER*** NOTE ***
&-NET-LINks:  LinkID=duct_2  Type=DSduct_2  FROM(zone room3)=9.
m TO(zone ext_HS_1)=2.m  deltaH=-7.m.  ZoneHeight+LinkHeight is
different for sides FROM & TO, like a vertical shaft.  Is this
OK ?
-----------------------------------------------------------

***CER*** NOTE ***
&-NET-LINks:  LinkID=crack_1  Type=CRcrack_1  FROM(zone room1)=
2.m  TO(zone room2)=5.m  deltaH=3.m.  ZoneHeight+LinkHeight is
different for sides FROM & TO, like a vertical shaft.  Is this
OK ?

Is this OK really?  I am not sure because there is no
description about it in the User`s guide.  Please teach me..


Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:08 am

peter_g_schild
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #290 of 862 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Dear yun, - duct_1 looks OK. You will nevertheless get a ***CER***NOTE mentioning duct_1's vertical 3m shaft. - duct_2 should have Height_to = 11 m. - crack_1...
Peter G. Schild
peter_g_schild
Offline Send Email
Dec 12, 2003
9:08 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help