Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
commercialspaceplace · Commercial Space Place - Commercial Space Forum
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1724 - 1726 of 1726   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#1726 From: Jim Davidson <planetaryjim@...>
Date: Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:37 am
Subject: "waiting for hardware"
planetaryjim
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
> "List of Private Spaceflight Companies"
> Wikipedia

Also waiting for licenses.  None of the space lines have
certificates of air worthiness, or licenses to launch
passengers.

The Russians, of course, don't mind launching passengers
for Space Adventures, anyway.

#1725 From: markreiff
Date: Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:13 am
Subject: Wikipedia List of Private Spaceflight Companies
markreiff
Offline Offline
 
FYI,

"List of Private Spaceflight Companies"
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_private_spaceflight_companies

: This page is a list of non-governmental entities that currently offer
: – or are planning to offer – equipment and services geared towards
: spaceflight, both robotic and human spaceflight.

Mark Reiff

#1724 From: markreiff
Date: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:41 pm
Subject: Commercial Spaceflight: All Systems Go
markreiff
Offline Offline
 
FYI,

"Commercial Spaceflight: All Systems Go - NASA should push the
frontiers. The private sector can handle the business of low Earth
orbit"
Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107204574475091646686368.html

: The following is by astronauts Buzz Aldrin, Ken Bowersox, Jake
: Garn, Robert Gibson, Hank Hartsfield, John Herrington, Byron
: Lichtenberg, John Lounge, Rick Searfoss, Norman Thagard, Kathryn
: Thornton, Jim Voss and Charles Walker:

: As crew members who have flown aboard spacecraft such as America's
: Space Shuttle and the International Space Station, we know that
: exploring space is a worthwhile and challenging endeavor. Increased
: use of public-private partnerships—where commercial companies
: assume a larger role in developing the systems to be used for space
: transportation—is one promising path to strengthen our nation's
: space exploration programs. Public-private partnerships can
: leverage the agility and efficiency of the commercial sector while
: maintaining access to the skilled workers, technologies and
: facilities only available in the government.

: The best place to exercise and grow these space-exploration
: partnerships is in low Earth orbit, where humans have the most
: experience and where economic incentives exist to make space travel
: routine. While it's completely appropriate for NASA to continue
: developing systems and the new technologies necessary to take crews
: farther out into our solar system, we believe that the commercial
: sector is fully capable of safely handling the critical task of
: low-Earth-orbit human transportation.

: So we firmly support the findings of the Augustine Committee, a
: presidential blue ribbon panel that has endorsed commercial human
: spaceflight. Sally Ride, one of America's most well-known
: astronauts and a member of the committee, put it best when she
: said, "We would like to be able to get NASA out of the business of
: getting people to low Earth orbit."

: We wholeheartedly agree. NASA should put its unique resources into
: pushing back the final frontier and not in repaving the
: earth-to-orbit road it cleared a half century ago. Commercial human
: spaceflight is not competitive with NASA. It is complementary.
: Indeed, a strong partnership between NASA and the commercial sector
: is nothing new. NASA already relies on commercial rockets to launch
: multibillion-dollar science payloads and NASA is well along in its
: plans to turn over space station cargo resupply duties to the
: private sector. The time has come for NASA to build on these
: successes and embrace commercial crew transportation as well.

: As astronauts, we know that safety is important. We are fully
: confident that the commercial spaceflight sector can provide a
: level of safety equal to that offered by the venerable Russian
: Soyuz system, which has flown safely for the last 38 years, and
: exceeding that of the Space Shuttle. Commercial transportation
: systems using boosters such as the Atlas V, Taurus II, or Falcon 9
: will have the advantage of multiple unmanned flights to build a
: track record of safe operations prior to carrying humans. These
: vehicles are already set to fly over 40 flights to orbit in the
: next four years.

: Commercial human spaceflight will also benefit America's economic
: competitiveness. The aerospace industry has long been one of the
: few American industries with a positive trade surplus.
: Strengthening this industry through investment in commercial
: development will improve the ability of the American aerospace
: industry to compete with foreign companies. This will result in
: more dollars spent on aerospace here in America, and more in
: hi-tech aerospace jobs.

: We enthusiastically endorse this robust vision for the future of
: human spaceflight—a vision in which NASA is free to concentrate on
: the challenges of exploration beyond low Earth orbit while private
: commerce enables increased activity in Earth orbit. We strongly
: agree with the Augustine Committee's endorsement of commercial
: human spaceflight, and we encourage the White House and Congress to
: embrace this positive vision for our nation's future in space.

Mark Reiff

Messages 1724 - 1726 of 1726   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help