Physicists are increasingly beginning to include aspects of Complex QM in their
work. This is a copy of one email I have made:

Hello Dr. Mohsen Kermanshahi,
I am happy to see that you understand the in mportance of complex numbers in QM
and also
their potential.
I have been putting the case for my Complex Qm forward since 1999. It is amazing
that
QM mathematicians fail to see the potential that we do.

You are correvt when you state:

"Although, the mathematics of complex numbers is highly developed, the physical
interpretation of the complex system is subject to debate.
The concept of complex numbers opens our eyes to the combination of the
qualitative and
quantitative characteristics of the elements. In reality, this combination is
the through
meaning of any element. Quantitative aspect alone does not convey the whole
entity.

The book in front of you is not just its size or the number of pages, words or
letters.
It is much more than that.
In this model, I take the lead and intuition from the concept of complex numbers
system
and enter consciousness as the imaginary and effective element in the physical
world.
I further examine if this extra factor have the ability to take theoretical
physics out of
the current dead-end and can offer solutions to existing paradoxes.
I hypothesize that; zero is the center and media for the universe and
represents an
entity here in after we call singularity. In following chapters we also examine
the
similarities between the singularity and consciousness. In addition, I take zero
as a
separate entity because in it, the value of space-time elements is zero.
Zero affects elements of space-time and whole existence revolves around it (unit
circle
concept). Furthermore, zero exists at any point at any domain and field. This
assumption
defies the concept of continuity and suggests that every physical element in our
universe
is discrete. "

In fact you seem to be developing different aspacts of the same work when you
mention
taking zero as a separate entity. That does raise some possibilities.
I believe that my work is more mathematically based while yours involves a
spiritual
connection. I view complex space as real and valid and SHOW how this can be
which I
suppose is a more rationistic approach.

If you would like to provide a link to my yahoo group it is at:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/complexquantummechanics

I hope you will take a look and perhaps post a message there. I will add a link
to

http://www.universaltheory.org/index.html

for you.
Yours sincerely,
Alex Ross