Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
concatenative · Discuss the concatenative variety of computer languages: Joy, Forth, Postscript

Group Information

? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Stay up to speed on the latest Groups news and updates, visit the Groups blog today!

Home

 

Activity within 7 days:

Description

The best introduction to this subject is at the Joy homepage.

In short, concatenative languages behave in a way which looks imperative (like C or Perl), but can be reasoned about in a functional manner (like ML or Haskell).

These languages are only beginning to be studied, although Forth had a heyday in the 80s, and Postscript is notable for being the most commonly metaprogrammed language in existance (a trait which I believe is not a coincidence).

Most Recent Messages

  (View All)
(Group by Topic)
Advanced
   Start Topic
Re: rewriting + second order vs. higher order expressivity
... Such an approach is the only way I can think of to solve the problem. Unfortunately, such an approach is also impossible (or, at least, requires far too
Posted - Thu Jun 19, 2008 3:25 pm
John Nowak
john@...
Send Email Send Email
Re: rewriting + second order vs. higher order expressivity
... Well, you've got my sympathy... That's an unfortunate dilemma. It looks like this model of a first-order language works very poorly with concatenativity.
Posted - Thu Jun 19, 2008 1:27 pm
William Tanksley, Jr
wtanksle
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: rewriting + second order vs. higher order expressivity
Slava has given an interesting example that has made me rethink getting rid of the n-ary 'map' functional: Given an array like {1, f, f, f, 2, f, f, 3, 4, f},
Posted - Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:49 am
John Nowak
john@...
Send Email Send Email
rewriting + second order vs. higher order expressivity
I've recently been considering a concatenative language variant without first-class functions. In such a language, you'd have a clear hierarchy with objects at
Posted - Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:50 am
John Nowak
john@...
Send Email Send Email
Re: syntax preference question
... Ah, I knew I didn't explain that properly (well, at all really). Let me recap briefly so I can be sure I've covered it. Factor has a family cleave
Posted - Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:07 pm
John Nowak
john@...
Send Email Send Email
Add concatenative to your personalized My Yahoo! page Add to My Yahoo! XML What's This?

Message History

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 17 49 209 89 55 16
2007 69 32 59 47 72 26 40 13 42 5 64 81
2006 16 14 10 11 30 63 53 12 29 49 59 28
2005 23 93 145 49 19 11 41 90 84 24 2 10
2004 21 3 1 42 70 54 25 36 41 81 49 27
2003 37 46 63 17 92 59 85 29 1 16 24
2002 40 18 37 70 6 22 17 26 5 13 11 24
2001 2 1 29 35 81 33 23 41 33 38 23 76
2000 172 188 65 51 44 4 1 11
What is Yahoo! Answers?

Yahoo! Answers, a new Yahoo! community, is a question and answer exchange where the world gathers to share what they know...and make each other's day. People can ask questions on any topic, and help others out by answering their questions.

What is Yahoo! Answers?

Yahoo! Answers, a new Yahoo! community, is a question and answer exchange where the world gathers to share what they know...and make each other's day. People can ask questions on any topic, and help others out by answering their questions.

Questions in Computers & Internet > Programming & Design

  • Questions are currently unavailable.

Want to help answer other questions? Go to Yahoo! Answers

Group Email Addresses


Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help