The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog
Yahoo! Groups Tips
Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.
|
Description
|
The CONLANG list is devoted to the discussion of "constructed" or
"artifical" languages for general communication. It is essentially
concerned with creative linbguistics and not such formal languages such
as programming languages or mathematical notation, except as they may
relate to a proposal for a mthod of communication. Since many constructed
languages have a fictional background, this description is complicated by
not being anle to use possibly descriptive terms such as "human language"
which would be descriptive, if it were not prejudicial to the Alien
conlangs.
The reasons for constructing languages cover a wide range of reasons,
from proposals to enhance international communication, to the creation of
more logical languages to enhance thinking or specialized forms of
communication, to exploring linguistic theory through model-building, as
background for fictional creation, as art for art's sake, and just for
fun.
SHORT AUXLANG DESCRIPTION, AND WHY THERE ARE TWO LISTS
The AUXLANG list is devoted to discussions of the merits and practicality
of particular International Auxiliary Languages -- languages intended to
enhance international communication. Since this topic inspires great
devotion and frequently also inspires high volumes of debate about the
merits and drawbacks of particular languages like Esperanto, the
discussion especially of the political, and strategic questions of IALs
has been moved to AUXLANG. Auxiliary languages are not banned from the
more general discussion on CONLANG, but the discussion's significance
should extend beyond the IAL community. For example, a discussion of
ergative case marking applied to Esperanto might be interesting to the
general community -- a lengthy discussion of the merits and disadvantages
of having case markings in an IAL would not be.
FLAMING
As current listowner for both lists, I would appreciate i
|
Messages in this group are sent from a remote email list:conlang@egroups.com
Re: Too simple to be derived?
... Okay -- maybe "poorly" or "ignorantly" done would serve better. I'm not saying it's wrong, just that, as with all human endeavours, it can be done better.
Posted - Sat May 18, 2013 3:11 pm
|
Padraic Brown
elemtilas@...
Send Email
|
Re: No = zero ?
... In general I think 'nothing39; is more more often, and more sensibly, associated with 'zero' than the mere negation is. Many European languages derive their
Posted - Sat May 18, 2013 8:08 am
|
BPJ
bpj@...
Send Email
|
Morpheme Classification
SSM3 is coming along. What's not coming along very well is a coherent grammatical description. For example, I have several prefixes described as cases, which
Posted - Sat May 18, 2013 4:48 am
|
neo gu
qiihoskeh@...
Send Email
|
Re: No = zero ?
... To that end, Géarthnuns has the ordinal word "vlézöfíb" (I believe I've mentioned this in list antiquity). It covers things that are perceived as
Posted - Sat May 18, 2013 4:11 am
|
Douglas Koller
douglaskoller@...
Send Email
|
Re: No = zero ?
... But, does "zero" always have to mean the mathematical concept of zero. I would argue that "zero" used as a quantifier could very well have the same
Posted - Sat May 18, 2013 3:00 am
|
George Corley
gacorley@...
Send Email
|
Add conlang to your personalized My Yahoo! page What's This?
|
Message History
|
|
Post message:
conlang@egroups.com
|