Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

conlang · Constructed Languages

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Home

 

Activity within 7 days:

Description

The CONLANG list is devoted to the discussion of "constructed" or

"artifical" languages for general communication. It is essentially

concerned with creative linbguistics and not such formal languages such

as programming languages or mathematical notation, except as they may

relate to a proposal for a mthod of communication. Since many constructed

languages have a fictional background, this description is complicated by

not being anle to use possibly descriptive terms such as "human language"

which would be descriptive, if it were not prejudicial to the Alien

conlangs.



The reasons for constructing languages cover a wide range of reasons,

from proposals to enhance international communication, to the creation of

more logical languages to enhance thinking or specialized forms of

communication, to exploring linguistic theory through model-building, as

background for fictional creation, as art for art's sake, and just for

fun.



SHORT AUXLANG DESCRIPTION, AND WHY THERE ARE TWO LISTS



The AUXLANG list is devoted to discussions of the merits and practicality

of particular International Auxiliary Languages -- languages intended to

enhance international communication. Since this topic inspires great

devotion and frequently also inspires high volumes of debate about the

merits and drawbacks of particular languages like Esperanto, the

discussion especially of the political, and strategic questions of IALs

has been moved to AUXLANG. Auxiliary languages are not banned from the

more general discussion on CONLANG, but the discussion's significance

should extend beyond the IAL community. For example, a discussion of

ergative case marking applied to Esperanto might be interesting to the

general community -- a lengthy discussion of the merits and disadvantages

of having case markings in an IAL would not be.



FLAMING



As current listowner for both lists, I would appreciate i

Most Recent Messages

  (View All)

Messages in this group are sent from a remote email list:conlang@egroups.com

Re: Too simple to be derived?
... Okay -- maybe "poorly" or "ignorantly" done would serve better. I'm not saying it's wrong, just that, as with all human endeavours, it can be done better.
Posted - Sat May 18, 2013 3:11 pm
Padraic Brown
elemtilas@...
Send Email Send Email
Re: No = zero ?
... In general I think 'nothing' is more more often, and more sensibly, associated with 'zero' than the mere negation is. Many European languages derive their
Posted - Sat May 18, 2013 8:08 am
BPJ
bpj@...
Send Email Send Email
Morpheme Classification
SSM3 is coming along. What's not coming along very well is a coherent grammatical description. For example, I have several prefixes described as cases, which
Posted - Sat May 18, 2013 4:48 am
neo gu
qiihoskeh@...
Send Email Send Email
Re: No = zero ?
... To that end, Géarthnuns has the ordinal word "vlézöfíb" (I believe I've mentioned this in list antiquity). It covers things that are perceived as
Posted - Sat May 18, 2013 4:11 am
Douglas Koller
douglaskoller@...
Send Email Send Email
Re: No = zero ?
... But, does "zero" always have to mean the mathematical concept of zero. I would argue that "zero" used as a quantifier could very well have the same
Posted - Sat May 18, 2013 3:00 am
George Corley
gacorley@...
Send Email Send Email
Add conlang to your personalized My Yahoo! page Add to My Yahoo! XML What's This?

Message History


Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help