Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
cosy-notecomputing · CoSy eXtremeComputing Environment
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: Programmers reactions to K : Raving Sane   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #16 of 33 |
John Gibbons wrote:

> Hmmm, it seemed like such an innocuous post when I first sent it out.

But very Religious .

> The IT department on the other hand :-(
>
> On the project side, our development budget was 25% of the annual
> maintenance budget of a competing mainframe system (and about 1.5% of their
> development budget). They run on one of the largest mainframe systems in the
> southern hemisphere, we run on a $10000 Compaq PC. They give monthly
> reports, we give live data online with greater functionality and information
> content. We are totally distributed and can scale on a worldwide basis.
>
> In contrast to David Ness, I don't believe that most corporate IT decisions
> are made on the basis of rational analysis. ...
>
> Developing with K/Kdb requires far fewer programmers than with conventional
> languages, and there are fewer lines of code to maintain. As a result the
> systems are more flexible and responsive to change than conventional
> systems, strangely enough this solves yet another outstanding commercial
> computing problem.
> The simplest answer is to pay the developers a large
> sum of money to stay (a large $number multiplied by a small number of K
> programmers is the same as a small $number multiplied by a large number of
> COBOL/C++ programmers) . You will in all probability get a significant cost
> saving.

Reminds me of when in 1976 at the Optical SocOfAmer Psychophysics conference ,
an elder I cited in my paper for having brought ( 1-D ) signal detection
theory into Psych Dept consciousness told me that what I had just presented
couldn`t be done for another generation -
- and damned if they didn`t about succeed .

I see the great challenge for Libertarians to succeed , is to explain how
commodities are alocated when there is so much less work " to go around " -
- when the irrational paperwork backed by Government guns ( to paraphrase
Greenspan ) is gone .

These are people`s whole lives we`re talking about .

--
--- BobArmstrong -- http://CoSy.com -- 212-285-1864 ---

LIBERTARIAN for US Congress (NY-8) : http://www.boba-in-y2k.org
> > > 143 Days to the Election < < <

" You`ll miss 100% of all the shots you don`t take "
Wayne Gretzky , Bloomberg quote of the day |000503

Next Weekly Politics,Pizza&Brew @ 42 PeckSlip : Thu 0622 => 18:30

CHAT , any time I`m online , BobA :
http://www.asylumnet.org/cgi-bin/webchat.cgi?BobA-in-Y2K
MAILGROUP : Keep up to date on events , add your feedback .
http://www.egroups.com/group/boba-in-y2k/
COMMENTARY AND EVENTS
http://cosy.com/home.htm#ThisWeek Updtd : 000610

** I reserve the right to post all communications I receive or
generate to CoSy website for further reflection .



Sat Jun 17, 2000 6:21 pm

bob@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #16 of 33 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

... But very Religious . ... Reminds me of when in 1976 at the Optical SocOfAmer Psychophysics conference , an elder I cited in my paper for having brought (...
bob@...
Send Email
Jun 17, 2000
6:21 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help