Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
cph_theory
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Spring and gravity   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1804 of 9113 |
Spring and Gravity

For Newton, the force of gravity was merely a function of masses and the distance between them. For
Einstein, gravity was caused by a deformation of the space-time continuum. On this basis, he developed a highly complex algebra that merely describes it geometrically. The majority of studies to date explain only the effects of gravity and not its nature.
The unification of gravity with electricity has been a challenge for many great physicists of the last century. Einstein dedicated almost 35 years to the problem without success, while, in 1968, Dirac
suggested that it would not be possible to unify the fundamental forces.
There is now a large body of evidence to suggest a strong connection between - and perhaps a common fundamental origin of - electromagnetism and gravity.*

I do not agree with Dirac. There is a unified force in nature and the key of unification is in reconsider the relationship between force and energy. In fact force and energy are equivalent. Force converts in energy and energy changes in force. And any effort for finding a unified theory without attention to equivalency of force and energy will has no success. In fact many of univesal mysteries will be solve with conversion force and energy. I will begin it with spring and then I explain gravity and effective nuclear charge.

Spring;

Take a look at spring. There is a spring that a side of it connects to wall (Figure1). In formal physics it is explained with conversion of potential energy and kinetic energy. let explain it by according conversion force and energy.

  

Figure1

 A, Spring pushed by hand. In during hand were pushing spring, hand's energy converted to force. In fact a lot of CPH had left hand and arrived to spring. The momenton of these CPH transfered to spring. Hand losed momentum (and enegy), and spring taked momentum and energy. It is like the following example; a wagon has a lot of sands that collides with an emty wagon. Some sands leave first wagon and arrive to emty wagon. .

In position A, F= - kx and its direction is toward the left side and energy is equal zero E=0.

B; force is converting to energy. Spring will return to its equillibrium situation. Object does opposite with spring's movment. Spring's force converts to energy and the amout of force is decreasing and energy is increasing.

C; no force appleid on object, but energy is maximom. Object is moving toward the left side and its energy converts to force.

 

Gravity:

By according CPH Theory, gravity is a follow between objects. For example do consider to earth and moon.
Earth has a gravity field. Gravity field is formed of gravitons that are moving toward the earth and they are interacting with each other. Take a look at earth and moon. There are two fields; one is around the earth and other one is around the moon. When a graviton reaches to earth, other one moves toward the moon and pushing earth toward moon. . Also when a graviton reaches to moon, other one moves toward the earth and pushing moon toward the earth. Intensity of gravity in a plane between earth and moon depends to gravitons are coming and passing of plane. (remember flow and ebb).
So earth (In fact every thing) is bombaring with gravitons.

CPH does carry gravity force. CPH moves with speed Vc in an inretial frame if no external force applied on it. When external force applied on CPH, it take spin and calls graviton.

So, Vc is equal speed (in an inertial frame) of graviton, when it has no spin.
Also, Photon is formed of many of CPH that they have spin and photon has spin too. So, when photon is traveling with speed c, CPH has linear speed c and it has itself spin, and a speed for speed of photon (it is in structure of phton).
So, a quantum energy formed of a lot of cph. Also, cph (graviton) works on cph and produces energy. In the other word, force and energy are equivalent. Force converts to energy and energy changes to force.
Take a look at figure2.
 
 
Figure2;
 
When a photon is moving in space that there is no any gravity effect, it moves on a linear with speed c(head of Figure2). But space is full of gravity. So, photon's path is like the right side of Figure2.
Left side of Figure2 shows a photon is moving in a gravitational field of a massive body.
In point A, photon has speed c, frequencyf and energy E that reaches to point A. Gravity field acts on photon, some gravitons arrive into structure of photon. Photon accelerates toward massive body. Its frequency, energy and speed change.
In point B, photon has frequency f1, energy E1 and speed c1. In during photon is falling, distance between photon and body decreases, until it reaches to point G. In point G Frequency, speed and energy is maximom for that photon. When photon reaches to point F' is same as point F.
and so on. In point A' it is same as point A.
Behavior of photon and gravitational field is same as spring and object. In the left side of Figure2, when a photon is falling, it shifts to blue and gravity force converts ioto energy.
When photon is escaping massive body it shifts to red and energy converts to gravity force.
 

Effective Nuclear Charge

Introduction;

The effective nuclear charge (Z*) is the "pull" that the specific electron "feels" from the nucleus. Of the first time Slater did give a simple rule for calculate the effective nuclear charge on any electron in any atoms in 1930. Clementi and Raimondi did their work on effective nuclear charges in the early 1960s. The results of Clementi's method is diffenrence of Staler's rule. For example Clementi calculated as Sc from a 4s perspective Z*=4.632 , but Staler's Z* is equal 3..

Staler's rule and Clementi's method based on expriments. There is no any analystic method for why and how the strongly of nuclear charge does lose? By according CPH theory force and energy are equivalence. Force converts to energy and energy changes to force. I will give a Mathematical Mode for Effective Nuclear Charge by CPH Theory.

Mathematical Mode;

By according Theory of CPH, when a force works on an object/particle, when W (work) is positive, force converts to energy and when W<o, energy changes to force.

Suppose an atom with Z proton is at stationary state, its Nuclear Charge Fz and Effective Nuclear Charge on an electron is Fz*. In during Fz reaches to electron, its works on other electrons is W, so Fw converts to energy E=W and electron feels the effective nuclear charge equal Fz* that given by;

Fz*=Fz - Fw

Group each electron like this:

(1s)(2s,2p)(3s,3p)(3d)(4s,4p)(4d)(4f)(5s,5p)(5d)(5f)...

Electrons to the right of the electron you have chosen do not contribute.

Examples;

Suppose two objects A and B absorb each other. By according CPH Theory a force particle leaves A and pulls it toward B, when force particle reaches to B, another leaves B and pulls it toward A and so on. In the following examples please attend that electrons are moving in their orbits, but Fz (nuclear charge) moves faster than electrons.

Hydrogen;

Hydrogen atom contains one proton and one electron in 1s, so Fw=o and Fz=Fz*. Because there is no any other electron in hydrogen atom and Fw=0. Clementi supposed Fz*=1

Hellium;

Hellium contains two protons and two electrons in 1s. Fz=2 from two protons moves toward electron1. Electron2 has electric charge and magnetic field. So, Fz acts on electron2. But direction of Fz is toward the electron1. So, electron2 does change direction of Fz. It deppends to distance between electrons in this orbit. Suppose this effect is nothing.

But, Fz works on electron2, energy of electron2 increses and Fz loses a part of its strong. So, the effective nuclear charge Fz* on electron1 given by;

Fz*=Fz - Fw

Energy of electron2 increases equal E=W. It leaves its orbit. But electric force leaves it toward nuclear and pulls electron2 toward nuclear. Also, electric force of electron1 acts on it. Then electron2 comes back to its orbit and loses energy E, and E converts to electric force equal Fw. Then Fw does add to Fz* that is coming back of electron1 and Fz=Fz*+Fw reaches to nuclear. So, nuclear feels that effective force of electron1 is equal Fz.

The effective nuclear charge Fz* on electron2 is same as electron1. By according Clementi calculate Fz*=1.688

Lithium;

Lithium has 3 protons and 3 electrons, two electrons are in 1s and one electron is in 2s.

For 1s;

Fz=3 from 3 protons moves toward electron1 in 1s orbit . This case is same as Helliu, but radius of 1s orbits is smaller than in Hellium and distance between electrons is less than Hellium's orbit. So deviation direction of Fz is less than in Hellium. It shows the effect of deviation direction for Fz is less than Hellium. By according Clementi's calculate Fz*=2.691. Do compare with Hellium that Fz*=1.688.

For 2s;

There is one eletron in orbit 2s in Lithium. So, this electron feels Fz* that is coming of over the orbit 1s. Fz=3 leaves nuclear toward it. Fz works on two electrons in orbit 1s.

Fz loses Fw1 for act on electron1, and Fw2 for act on electron2. So, when Fz reaches to orbit 1s, It comes up to F'z=Fz - (Fw1+Fw2).

In during F'z is passing of orbit 1s, it works on the sum of electron1 and electron2. Suppose this work is equal Fw3.

So, Fw=Fw1+Fw2+Fw3 and Fz*=Fz-Fw reaches to electron in orbit 2s. By according Clementi's calculation Fz*=1.279.

When Fz* reaches to electron electron, then an other electric force particle equal Fz* leaves it toward nuclear. When it reaches to orbit 1s works on it. In during Fz* is passing of orbit 1s, energy E=W converts to force Fw and Fz=Fz*+Fw reaches to nuclear.

Summary;

For calculation the effective nuclear charge Fz* on any electron in any atoms, we must calculate Fw. W is the sum of works that Fz acts on electrons and orbits (or suborbits) befor Fz reaches to it.

For example; For Na from a 3s,

Na has 11 protons and 11 electrons, so;

A. 2 electrons in 1s, Fw1

B. an orbit n1, Fw2

C. 6 electrons in 2p, Fw3

D. a suborbit 2p, Fw4

E. 2 electrons in 2s, Fw5

F. an orbit n2, Fw6

So, Fw=Fw1+Fw2+Fw3+Fw4+Fw5+Fw6,

and Fz*=Fz-Fw

 

Sincerely

Hossein Javadi

 

 


Wed May 26, 2004 12:40 pm

amir_javadi4
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Attachment
1.jpg
Type:
image/jpeg
Attachment
2.jpg
Type:
image/jpeg
Forward
Message #1804 of 9113 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Spring and Gravity For Newton, the force of gravity was merely a function of masses and the distance between them. For Einstein, gravity was caused by a...
Hossein Javadi
amir_javadi4
Offline Send Email
May 26, 2004
2:08 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help