Here, ideas and information, regarding cataclysmic variables are exchanged between professional and amateur astronomers, educators and students, variable star organizations and individuals from around the world.
CVnet-discussion will be tightly focused and concentrate on cataclysmic variables only. Questions and comments regarding general astronomy, gamma-ray bursts, photometry, eclipsing binaries, LPVs, politics, etc., will be directed by the moderators to appropriate non-CVnet lists, where they can be addressed properly and won’t take up CVnet bandwidth.
Visit the AAVSO CV Section website at: https://sites.google.com/site/aavsocvsection/
Since most of the stars in this sequence are reddened, I've revised it to exclude the known variables and suspects, and replaced the bluer stars with new 12th
I just checked ASAS3 and the 123 star is asas variable 190346+1629.9and the 129 star looks like it's a variable also. Richard Campbell CMP ... [Non-text
The shape of the light curve of this cataclysmic variable is changing rapidly. Observations made last night (through some clouds, alas) show that the "hump"
... Quite honestly, Mike, I don't see the 12.3 as looking particularly off from its listed magnitude value. On the other hand, the 12.3 and 12.6 are almost
The culprit is the 123 comp, which is not only red (B-V= 1.9 over three nights) it is a variable and not part of the sequence!! This is an error propagated by