Mike, Thanks for circulating this. Chris Lloyd at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory has been looking at the data and has found variation with a 7 day period...
Give me coordinates and not just GSC name. Then I can check my photometry of this field. Note that NSV11753 is located here (thanks, John), of which I have...
J2000 coords from Guide 8.0 for GSC 3132-1448 are RA 19h 06m 46.60s Dec +44d 01m 46.30s Regards, David ... From: arne To: cvnet-discussion@yahoogroups.com ...
One of the most entertaining CVs in the northern sky, RX And, looks like it may be going into a standstill. After five outbursts in 70 days RX And seems to be...
Bernhard02, as discussed on CVnet in October, should be reported as RSXJ224342. I have been working an a sequence for this star, but am not totally satisfied...
... Title: Dwarf Nova TSS J022216.4+412260 Author: R. Quimby, M. Sellers, P. Mondol (U. Texas) and The Nearby Supernova Factory: P. Antilogus, S. Gilles, R....
I have submitted quite a few CCD measurements of this star of the the last month using the WebObs "CCD batch upload tool" at AAVSO. I used the name RXSJ224342....
Hi Mike, ... Could you clarify which is correct please? I have some C, V and I photometry on this field and could check your sequence if that would be helpful....
To me this just highlights the ridiculous situation we find ourselves in with regard to names/designations for newly discovered variable stars. The sooner...
Hello Mike As John Greaves pointed out on AAVSO chat, its not yet 100% sure that Bernhard02 is identical with the ROSAT source (the ROSAT coords differ...
And what about Z Cam? It looks like it has entered a standstill after rising from quiescence. Is it a rare phenomenon? Has this been seen in other Z Cam's? ...
Hi Elizabeth, This can't be the correct Harvard Designation. The B1900 coordinates are 22h 38m 59.9s +30o 23' 53". So the HD should be 2238+30. ... And is...
I do not see the point at all why a new designation has to be created, as long as a valid catalogue name is available. Just for the fun of it, I checked the...
... CV ... there are ... get any ... objects are left ... That's the 64,000 dollar question Boris. A question we've been asking for a long time now. Gary ... ...
... Hi Boris, I agree a new designation does not have to be created (other than the proper HD number). The cross-ID in the validation file appear to be ...
New variable object at RA 22:43:40.68, DEC +30:55:21.65 There has been much confusion over the name of this object, variously called RXSJ2243+3, Bernhard 02,...
New variable object at RA 22:43:40.68, DEC +30:55:21.65 There has been much confusion over the name of this object, variously called RXSJ2243+3, Bernhard 02,...
I would like to thank all very much for the interest in this object and for suggestions and observations. Jochen Pietz and I have observed this star in many...
All, I have just published my DV Dra light curve and period analysis graphs on my website http://www.peranso.com. Enjoy ! Best regards, Tonny PS : congrats to...
Reverse and standard charts for 1RSX J224342.3+305526 are in the cvnet files section. Photometry is Henden (single night), sequence by B. Sumner. This one...
I don't know what type of star this is, but it is active for sure. My observation on Nov. 20 was <14.7 RXSJ224342 051120.1111 <14.7 SXN Tonight it is quite...
Hi Mike, I had a look at the light curve that Jochen Pietz has on his web page - this does not look like any type of CV I've seen before, certainly not like a...
Boris.Gaensicke@...
Nov 23, 2005 1:35 pm
676
I think we will rename the charts and refer to this object as GSC 2736 1067. Arne Henden has reminded me that: - there is no clear evidence that this star is a...
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the cvnet-discussion group. File : /GSC...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
