Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
cyberia-l
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Legal outsourcing and US government surveillance - blows attorney-cl   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #50570 of 50593 |
Re: Legal outsourcing and US government surveillance - blows attorney-client privilege?

Every day, here in Washington D.C., scores of privileged legal
documents are turned over to unidentified, twenty-something bicycle
messengers-- never mind the hundreds of plain text fax transmissions,
and thousands of privileged documents that are dropped in a mailbox--
without anyone ever suggesting that the insecure delivery mode might
compromise the privilege. The unencrypted digital transmission,
overseas or domestic, is less insecure than any of those delivery
options.

In all the cases I can remember seeing on this issue, the only way I
recall anyone ever losing the privilege was by accidentally turning a
privileged document over to the other side-- and even then, courts
struggle to undergird the privilege by finding that mistakes happen
despite due care.

There's a vast difference between what one /should do/ to maintain
confidentiality /in fact/, and what one /must do/ to preserve the
privilege /as a matter of law/. Kevin arguably describes what a
careful lawyer should do, but not a court in the country would
require it.

John Noble

At 4:14 PM -0400 5/28/08, Kevin T. Neely wrote:
>On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 03:56:15PM -0400, Carol Shepherd wrote:
>> Looking for opinions on the intersection of attorney-client privilege
>> and government monitoring of commercial communications between US firms
>> and offshore service providers. A DC law firm has sued the government
>
>
>(without reading the article, well, I skimmed it *very* briefly) Is
>the firm either 1) not encrypting the data end-to-end or 2) claiming
>the government can/does break the encryption to read and analyze the
>data? I believe a law firm has a duty to use reasonable means to
>protect the attorney-client priv and to not encrypt the data with
>strong encryption would, IMHO, constitute a breach of that duty.
>
>I am going to include the phone conversations between lead attys in
>the US and the reviewers in India as something that ought to be
>encrypted.
>
>K
>
>--
>In Vino Veritas
>http://astroturfgarden.com
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>For Listserv Instructions, see http://www.lawlists.net/cyberia
>Off-Topic threads: http://www.lawlists.net/mailman/listinfo/cyberia-ot
>Need more help? Send mail to: Cyberia-L-Request@...
>**********************************************************************


**********************************************************************
For Listserv Instructions, see http://www.lawlists.net/cyberia
Off-Topic threads: http://www.lawlists.net/mailman/listinfo/cyberia-ot
Need more help? Send mail to: Cyberia-L-Request@...
**********************************************************************



Wed May 28, 2008 10:16 pm

jfnbl@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #50570 of 50593 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Looking for opinions on the intersection of attorney-client privilege and government monitoring of commercial communications between US firms and offshore...
Carol Shepherd
arborlaw@...
Send Email
May 28, 2008
8:21 pm

... (without reading the article, well, I skimmed it *very* briefly) Is the firm either 1) not encrypting the data end-to-end or 2) claiming the government...
Kevin T. Neely
ktneely@...
Send Email
May 28, 2008
8:53 pm

Every day, here in Washington D.C., scores of privileged legal documents are turned over to unidentified, twenty-something bicycle messengers-- never mind the...
jfn
jfnbl@...
Send Email
May 28, 2008
10:44 pm

... I don't think it necessarily waives the evidentiary privilege - but it certainly infringes upon attorney-client confidentiality, which is a related but...
Greg Broiles
gbroiles@...
Send Email
May 28, 2008
10:48 pm

From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@...> Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 18:34 Subject: Re: [CYBERIA] Legal outsourcing and US government surveillance - blows...
Randall Webmail
rvh40@...
Send Email
May 29, 2008
2:47 am

I'm actually teaching attorney-client privilege this week in professional responsibility. A good analogy is that there are bar opinions saying that the...
Peter Swire
peter@...
Send Email
May 29, 2008
5:48 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help