Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
cyberia-l
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Fax vs Scanned Signatures   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #50576 of 50593 |
Re: Fax vs Scanned Signatures

But using the UETA or E-sign, we can accept scanned signatures through e-mail.
It's not even a close question.

There are even a couple of court decisions out there suggesting that if someone
says "I agree" during a digitally recorded conversation, it can be a valid
signature under the UETA.

Prior to the UETA and E-sign and similar statutes, it wasn't the fax of the
signature that was considered valid, but the original signature presumably still
at the other end of the faxing process. If the person in possession of the
original signature refused to produce the document or shredded it, the fax could
be used as evidence that the original signature had, in fact, existed. For many
purposes this was perfectly acceptable. Of course, the same concept will apply
to a scan of a real signature.

Regards,

- Warren Agin
_____________________________________
Warren E. Agin
Swiggart & Agin, LLC
197 Portland Street
Boston, MA 02114
617.742.0110 x203 fax 617.723.2830
direct: 617.517.3203
WEA@...
http://www.swiggartagin.com
_____________________________________

For more information about Swiggart & Agin, LLC, please visit
http://www.swiggartagin.com. for topical legal information, please visit
www.lawtrove.com.

----- Original Message -----
From: Drew Lehman
To: CYBERIA-L@...
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:44 AM
Subject: Fax vs Scanned Signatures


These ia an interesting article by Bruce Schneier about why we accept
faxed signatures through unsecured pots lines and why we can't accept
scanned signatures through email.

"Aren't fax signatures the weirdest thing? It's trivial to cut and paste
-- with real scissors and glue -- anyone's signature onto a document so
that it'll look real when faxed. There is so little security in fax
signatures that it's mind-boggling that anyone accepts them. Yet people
do, all the time. I've signed book contracts, credit card
authorizations, nondisclosure..."

http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/06/fax_signatures.html

Slashdot post - http://it.slashdot.org/it/08/06/03/1317221.shtml


**********************************************************************
For Listserv Instructions, see http://www.lawlists.net/cyberia
Off-Topic threads: http://www.lawlists.net/mailman/listinfo/cyberia-ot
Need more help? Send mail to: Cyberia-L-Request@...
**********************************************************************


**********************************************************************
For Listserv Instructions, see http://www.lawlists.net/cyberia
Off-Topic threads: http://www.lawlists.net/mailman/listinfo/cyberia-ot
Need more help? Send mail to: Cyberia-L-Request@...
**********************************************************************



Tue Jun 3, 2008 9:06 pm

wea@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #50576 of 50593 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

These ia an interesting article by Bruce Schneier about why we accept faxed signatures through unsecured pots lines and why we can't accept scanned signatures...
Drew Lehman
dlehman@...
Send Email
Jun 3, 2008
3:22 pm

But using the UETA or E-sign, we can accept scanned signatures through e-mail. It's not even a close question. There are even a couple of court decisions out...
Warren E. Agin
wea@...
Send Email
Jun 3, 2008
9:44 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help