Here's an even more basic question. But I've been on vacation and just deleted the 600+ (no kidding) spams that accumulated over the 7 days I was gone, so I...
Chris Savage
chris.savage@...
Jan 2, 2004 10:09 pm
48026
1. There has to be a contract pursuant to which the service was provided. It is either written, oral, or implied by conduct. 2. If written, what does it...
Chris Savage
chris.savage@...
Jan 2, 2004 10:14 pm
48027
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=528&e=6&u=/ap/20031231/ap_on_hi_te/web_innovator_knighthood Queen to Knight Early Web Innovator AP Wed Dec 31,...
Randall
rvh40@...
Jan 3, 2004 7:34 am
48028
... Yes, that was a California thing (and it was spelled "ADLT"), and CAN-SPAM has some requirement vaguely like it which will be largely ignored. The closest...
Bill Stewart
bill.stewart@...
Jan 3, 2004 10:05 am
48029
... From: Bill Stewart [mailto:bill.stewart@...] Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 5:04 AM To: CYBERIA-L@... Subject: Re: CAN-SPAM...
Chris Savage
chris.savage@...
Jan 3, 2004 11:51 am
48030
[Apparently the new owners of Linux Gazette are having some issues with the people who remember it as it once was}: ====== http://lwn.net/Articles/63383/ From:...
Randall
rvh40@...
Jan 4, 2004 1:51 am
48031
... Many of the state anti-spam laws had labeling provisions, some of which conflicted with other states' provisions. E.g. "ADV:" vs. "ADV-" and "ADLT" vs. ...
Ray Everett-Church
lists@...
Jan 4, 2004 5:25 am
48032
[First sent to Johnmacsgroup]: ==== http://www.governing.com/articles/11talk.htm Addressing URLs The feds are asking cities and counties to change their .gov...
Randall
rvh40@...
Jan 4, 2004 8:02 am
48033
... From: Ray Everett-Church [mailto:lists@...] Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 12:25 AM To: CYBERIA-L@... Subject: Re: CAN-SPAM...
Chris Savage
chris.savage@...
Jan 4, 2004 10:50 am
48034
... There is already the ".us" hierarchy of domain names, and it has been around for as long as ".gov" has been around. And the ".us" hierarchy already had...
Carl Oppedahl
carl@...
Jan 4, 2004 2:29 pm
48035
[...] Many of the state anti-spam laws had labeling provisions, some of which conflicted with other states' provisions. E.g. "ADV:" vs. "ADV-" and "ADLT" vs. ...
Ethan Ackerman
eackerma@...
Jan 4, 2004 4:51 pm
48036
... From: Ethan Ackerman [mailto:eackerma@...] Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 11:52 AM To: CYBERIA-L@... Subject: Re: CAN-SPAM...
Chris Savage
chris.savage@...
Jan 4, 2004 10:42 pm
48037
... The .US domain was "transferred" and the new .US manager NeuStar has been changing the "rules." Many state and local governments are transitioning out of...
Sean Donelan
sean@...
Jan 5, 2004 1:27 am
48038
... But still, what a horrible botch. Jon Postel would have hated it. Replacing "city.milwaukee.wi.us" with "city.milwaukee.wi.gov" or even...
Bill Stewart
bill.stewart@...
Jan 5, 2004 8:10 am
48039
Oh well, then, it's in print, and by god even HRH said so so then it's final. This Sir Tim - he made 2 UNIX text files connect to each other?, for certain...
GC Koch
gckoch@...
Jan 5, 2004 10:54 pm
48040
Does anyone have any experience in drafting and executing a document management policy (especially as it pertains to email). I know that cases such as Zubulake...
Mark Milone
milone@...
Jan 6, 2004 2:23 pm
48041
There's a book called "E-Mail Rules" by Flynn & Kahn, published by Legato Systems, Inc. Legato sells email management software that supposedly helps implement...
John Noble
jnoble@...
Jan 6, 2004 8:37 pm
48042
If gov't standards are of any help, you can check out the National Archives. They have something going on called the Electronic Records Management Initiative....
Stephen T. Middlebrook
Stephen.Middlebrook@...
Jan 6, 2004 9:12 pm
48043
Hi, I find it most distasteful that in the 21st Century someone can be put to death while suffering a mental illness, in the Western world, it could only...
daftjack
daftjack@...
Jan 7, 2004 1:24 pm
48044
... management policy (especially as it pertains to email). There are (of course) consultants who do this. See http://www.rii-llc.com/ ...
Jacobs, John M ESQ TL...
John.Jacobs@...
Jan 7, 2004 2:01 pm
48045
Back of the envelop math I found 16 SPAMs in my Yahoo account this morning 8 were not in compliance with the SPAM Act 8 were in compliance with the SPAM Act By...
Robert Cannon
rcannon101@...
Jan 7, 2004 3:25 pm
48046
... According to a US Postal Service database, the address is used by a "Commercial Mail Receiving Agency". It appears to be a Mail Box Etc office. ...
Sean Donelan
sean@...
Jan 7, 2004 5:06 pm
48047
Would this be considered a Trap&Trace under the wiretap statutues? Or something else, such as sending a certified letter or FedEx package asking for a...
Sean Donelan
sean@...
Jan 7, 2004 5:38 pm
48048
The Post had an article yesterday noting that spam appears to be flowing with its usual vigor. Brightmail says 60% of the mail it filters is spam. Postini...
Stephen T. Middlebrook
Stephen.Middlebrook@...
Jan 7, 2004 5:59 pm
48049
... As I understand it, it wouldn't literally be a "trap and trace," since those terms relate specifically to telephone numbers a subject dials and/or that...
Chris Savage
chris.savage@...
Jan 7, 2004 6:50 pm
48050
... I am told that the primary purpose of the Jan 1, 2004 effective date was to preempt the California Spam law. Otherwise, people have had barely enuf time to...
Robert Cannon
rcannon101@...
Jan 7, 2004 7:33 pm
48051
... But if the FBI or other gov't agency asked Best Buy to send the email with the web bug or equivalent, then isn't Best Buy acting as the FBI's agent? If BB...
Stephen T. Middlebrook
Stephen.Middlebrook@...
Jan 7, 2004 8:29 pm
48052
... up. Also, it seems relevant to me that one of the parties to the communications (in this case, Best Buy) fully consented to it.<<<< ... with the web bug...
Chris Savage
chris.savage@...
Jan 7, 2004 8:41 pm
48053
... Possibly (probably??) not see U.S. v. Jarrett 338 F.3d 339 (2003), http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/024953.P.pdf (FBI used Israeli hacker to nab...
Mike Oliver
me@...
Jan 7, 2004 8:51 pm
48054
... But this is a little disengenious isn't it? I mean this isn't really about one party to a communication releasing the contents of that communication to a...