It's all about preservation. Do you know how many movies no longer exist? -Warren Agin ... From: "Martin Klingmeyer" <martin@...> To:...
Warren E. Agin
wea@...
Mar 1, 2004 1:47 pm
48257
... I am painfully aware of how many movies do not exist. In fact, I'm involved with the preservation of phonorecords. The population of which is shrinking ...
Martin Klingmeyer
martin@...
Mar 1, 2004 3:08 pm
48258
... Does anyone have the opinion/order, or a pointer to it? I couldn't find anything on PACER for the District of Maryland. But then, there's no doubt my ...
Mike Riddle
mriddle@...
Mar 1, 2004 4:12 pm
48259
FYI - here is a link to the complain filed by verisign in the US district court of central california - enjoy :) ...
Joe Baptista
baptista@...
Mar 2, 2004 1:45 pm
48260
The Post reported yesterday : A U.S. appeals court yesterday struck down key elements of a Federal Communications Commission rule governing local telephone...
Stephen T. Middlebrook
Stephen.Middlebrook@...
Mar 3, 2004 4:21 pm
48261
... From: Stephen T. Middlebrook [mailto:Stephen.Middlebrook@...] Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:21 AM To: CYBERIA-L@... Subject: DC...
Chris Savage
chris.savage@...
Mar 3, 2004 8:15 pm
48262
... Uh - didn't Covad build its' OWN network, instead of relying on unbundling of the ILEC's fiber? ISTR that that was their original business plan, back...
Randall
rvh40@...
Mar 3, 2004 8:44 pm
48263
... From: Randall [mailto:rvh40@...] Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 3:44 PM To: CYBERIA-L@... Subject: Re: DC Circuit strikes down FCC...
Chris Savage
chris.savage@...
Mar 3, 2004 9:00 pm
48264
... We are talking about the Last Mile, which is still a monopoly resource for telcos. It is uneconomic to even begin to think about digging new trenches to...
Carl Oppedahl
carl@...
Mar 3, 2004 9:09 pm
48265
[[I composed this email before Chris responded, hopefully it fills out his comments...]]] The nutshell answer: this case is about Baby Bells and their...
Ethan Ackerman
eackerma@...
Mar 3, 2004 9:23 pm
48266
... No. We have at best a defacto duopoly on the Last Mile. Various upstarts have tried "overbuilding" and you can observe a case of that by putting "RCN...
David Lesher
wb8foz@...
Mar 4, 2004 1:52 pm
48267
This was on CNN last night and the Wash.Post has it again this morning. First reported a few months ago, now an investigation has found "systemic downloading...
Stephen T. Middlebrook
Stephen.Middlebrook@...
Mar 5, 2004 4:03 pm
48268
... I don't know if this is true or not, but I've read that there was no "hacking" involved, that the files were on a shared server and that there were NO (not...
Randall
rvh40@...
Mar 5, 2004 4:15 pm
48269
... According to the reports, the files were stored on a common server with no protection, the Dems had been warned, and had done nothing to move the files to...
Mike Riddle
mriddle@...
Mar 5, 2004 4:24 pm
48270
... I dunno. And would the facts below (the memos were available via "my Network Places" on the committees' network), if true, deter a prosecution? Isn't...
David Bolduc
dbolduc@...
Mar 5, 2004 4:40 pm
48271
... http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040301-115931-9096r.htm ********************************************************************** For Listserv...
Mike Riddle
mriddle@...
Mar 5, 2004 4:44 pm
48272
Doesn't the relevant statute simply prohibit access to a computer "in excess of authorization?" I do not recall anything about requiring the victim to use...
Eric C. Grimm
eric.grimm@...
Mar 5, 2004 4:51 pm
48273
Perhaps the use of the word "hacking" is inappropriate, depending on your definition of the term. But the fact, if true, that the files had no protections on...
Stephen T. Middlebrook
Stephen.Middlebrook@...
Mar 5, 2004 4:53 pm
48274
... Excellent question, but is it in excess of authorization to access a file, from your own workstation, that appears in your own Network Neighborhood folder,...
Mike Riddle
mriddle@...
Mar 5, 2004 5:04 pm
48275
I do not write these statutes -- Congress does. And, yes, I think they wrote it broadly so that it would cover this situation. And, from the news reports, at...
Eric C. Grimm
eric.grimm@...
Mar 5, 2004 5:20 pm
48276
... How should anyone be reasonably expected to know what the level of authorization is for a file serving resource that's been effectively made public? Why is...
Michael S. Fischer
michael@...
Mar 5, 2004 5:24 pm
48277
... from ... folder, from ... parties? That's why we need to see the terms of use. Does it say "you may use this account to access Senator Joe's email and...
Stephen T. Middlebrook
Stephen.Middlebrook@...
Mar 5, 2004 5:28 pm
48278
It seems we're getting down to the nitty-gritty here about CFAA "authorization" and exceeding it. How long until someone can provide a link to the actual...
Ethan Ackerman
eackerma@...
Mar 5, 2004 5:34 pm
48279
... On the contrary, anyone who leaves privileged documents publicly readble on a publicly accessible computer deserves no protection, whether there are ...
Michael S. Fischer
michael@...
Mar 5, 2004 5:35 pm
48280
Eric Grimm asks: <snip> ... <snip> Should we? Possibly. In reality, do we? No more than we can honestly expect Congresscritters to live up to the standard...
David Bolduc
dbolduc@...
Mar 5, 2004 5:49 pm
48281
Date: 05 Mar 2004 12:54:59 -0500 From: Randall <rvh40@...> To: Joe Baptista <baptista@...> Subject: [ATTN JLB MSG] Could you forward this to...
Joe Baptista
baptista@...
Mar 5, 2004 6:18 pm
48282
Just an observation with several pointers. I noticed a cryptic little line in today's NYT article about the Senate Judiciary "memogate," which reminded me of...
Ethan Ackerman
eackerma@...
Mar 5, 2004 6:46 pm
48283
... on ... This is tautology. The docs weren't privileged, they were just private. If the Repubs weren't supposed to be reading other people's disks, then ...
Stephen T. Middlebrook
Stephen.Middlebrook@...
Mar 5, 2004 6:58 pm
48284
Foxnew.com is reporting that the Sergeant-at-Arms suggested that statutes other than just the CFAA may have been violated. ...
Stephen T. Middlebrook
Stephen.Middlebrook@...
Mar 5, 2004 7:08 pm
48285
... What's the functional difference? Private == privileged for the purposes of my argument. ... You're missing the point of my argument. Again, my point is...