In a dust storm, scientists find the first direct evidence of electrical discharge on Mars
Web edition
:
Monday, June 22nd, 2009

Text Size

Electrical dustLightning
has been detected for the first time on Mars, and it may look something
like this artist’s illustration. Bits of debris in a dust devil rub
against one another and then discharge, causing a faint glow like the
one at the bottom of the image.University of Michigan Scientists
say they have seen the first direct evidence of lightning on Mars, in
the form of electrical discharges during a Martian dust storm.
The
finding has implications for human travel to the Red Planet and for
studying possible origins of life on Mars, the authors say in a paper
to appear in Geophysical Research Letters.
It has been
thought that lightning might be possible on Mars. Bits of dust rubbing
against each other in one of the planet’s famous dust devils could
charge up the particles the same way that running on a carpet charges
up socks. All that charge could then be discharged in a zap, either as
lightning or a shock.
But catching Martian lightning in the act
was difficult: The lightning bursts were too small to distinguish from
the energy emanating from the planet itself. And the dust storms
themselves obscured the faint glow that might have been visible from
just above the red planet.
To “see” the lightning, researchers
from the University of Michigan and colleagues used a new detector that
can distinguish microwave radiation emanating from natural objects like
dirt and rocks from a burst of lightning. Radiation from natural
objects, including Martian rocks, is relatively constant; radiation
from lightning displays changes in the distribution of frequencies of
light.
Using a 34-meter-diameter radio telescope in the
California desert, for about five hours a day for 12 days between May
22 and June 16, 2006, the researchers found no signs of the variable
radiation, except during a period of two or three hours. At that time a
Martian dust storm was on the side of Mars facing the scientists’
detector. “Every time we moved off Mars the [signal] went away. Then we
moved it back and it came back again,” says Christopher Ruf of the
University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, one of the study’s authors.
Lightning
as an explanation for the results makes sense, says geophysicist Phil
Christensen of Arizona State University in Tempe. “I can’t think of a
better explanation,” he says. “They found it to be in a dust storm, and
that’s exactly where you’d expect it.”
Lightning on Mars is
probably fainter and more diffuse than the lightning commonly observed
on Earth, says Nilton Renno, another author of the study. “The
atmosphere [on Mars] is much less dense,” he says. Instead of forks of
lightning, Martian lightning bursts would cover a wider area and would
have a “faint glow” like the light in a neon tube.