I am thinking about allowing coexistence of 1.2 and 2.0 libraries for the next release. This will insure that we continue to support 1.2 providers while new providers needing 2.0 features can also install and run on the same system. Does anyone see problems with this or have any suggestions other then separate naming conventions? I am thinking we will have to build/install 2.0 as dat2.conf, libdat2.so, libdapl2.so, and the development package as /usr/include/dat2/include.

comments?

Thanks,

-arlin