Since we do not have any urgent matter, I would like to cancel this week call. Several companies have a shutdown this week. If you think there is some urgent...
On the yesterday conf. call I gave myself an action item. The issue is the proposed it_ep_accept sync error when accepting/responding EP IRD < requesting EP...
We will have a DAT Collaborative conference call this Wednesday July 9, 1:00-2:00pm EDT (10:00am-11:00am PDT). Moderator: Arkady Kanevsky Phone: 888-827-8686 ...
Let me attempt to paraphrase the problem to see if I'm understanding the issue. DAT requires that the passive-side consumer only accept with an endpoint that...
... While not addressed yet, the IT implementation will only be able to generate such an error when the responding IRD is *known* to be less than the...
... The passive-side ULP was supposed to ensure that the QPs were configured compatibly. If it failed to do so then the peers are not truly communicating....
... The active and passive ULPs do not agree on whether the establishment handshake is 2-way or 3-way? How does that not qualify as a major design error? What...
The question is on what layer there is an agreement. DAT states it is 2-way on DAT layer. So ULP is 2-way only. On a transport layer below it still can be...
Below is the updated list of task to complete RI. All of the items from the last posting are on the list but some of them are marked as (done) with time needed...
I would like to propose adding one more flag value for EVD create for SEVD. The flag value is a bit map of what "notifications" SEVD should support for the ...
It would work if IT Impl follows the advice we state. That is arm for solicited wait and arm for all if Notify_flag is posted. But how is DAT Provider finds it...
Nice catch. I will fix the page 94 by replacing DAT_EVENT_TYPE_SOFTWARE with DAT_SOFTWARE_EVENT. For tracking purposes it is errata82. Arkady Arkady Kanevsky...
Steve, be careful. Since local DAT EVD is configured for Notification events and not for Solicited Wait ones DAT implementation will ignore them. IT...
Hi, DAT_PROVIDER_ATTR has a member "evd_stream_merging_supported" (udat_vendor_specific.h: line 85) which is a two dimensional array of type DAT_UINT32 *. When...
I have got a lot of feedback from Reference Implementation team, vendors and conformance team on the header files. Below is the list of requested changes. ...
We will have a DAT Collaborative conference call this Wednesday July 16, 1:00-2:00pm EDT (10:00am-11:00am PDT). Moderator: Arkady Kanevsky Phone: 888-827-8686 ...
One more potential header change: Qlen and timeout from signed to unsigned. Arkady This problem suggests to me that the DAT_TIMEOUT type should be unsigned....
At the next conf. call we will take a vote on: 1. Generating an errata for DAT-1.1 spec to fix the header files. There will not be next DAT spec version, nor...
Randy, I will file the errata for it. But the bottom line - this is Transport specific. For IB it is. For iWARP it is not. But it is still worse stating it for...
... A transport neutral application will assume that it is responsible for knowing how many Send and RDMA Read Credits it has, and not exceeding that limit. ...
We will have a DAT Collaborative conference call this Wednesday July 23, 1:00-2:00pm EDT (10:00am-11:00am PDT). Moderator: Arkady Kanevsky Phone: 888-827-8686 ...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
