Hi all, Whether consumer is expecting DTO completion events to be returned by the provider in the order of their postings ? OR in other way, Should provider...
Yogeshwar, Correct. For each EP all local completions are in the order posted. But local completion does NOT guarantee remote completion. For that the ordering...
Final IB draft. ________________________________ From: dat-discussions@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dat-discussions@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kanevsky, Arkady ...
We will have a DAT Collaborative conference call this Friday August 18, 12:00-1:00pm EDT (9:00am-10:00am PDT). Moderator: Arkady Kanevsky Phone: 888-827-8686 ...
Arlin, For 2.2.5.2 the description for DAT_COMPLETION_BARRIER_FENCE_FLAG should also have atomic barrier fence mentioned analogous to the DTO completion falg ...
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the dat-discussions group. File :...
dat-discussions@yahoo...
Aug 18, 2006 5:00 pm
4028
Arkady, You wanted me to clarify the following comment in the IB extensions atomic usage section. I think we have a couple of issues based on the current...
I would like to finish up the final draft so please comment on below... ________________________________ From: Davis, Arlin R Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006...
... below... ... For send/receive we are very clear that the ULP MUST provide its own flow control, and that any flow control at the transport layer is not...
Clearly, current DAT CM states that underlying transport will do what it must do. And we recommend that ULP, if interested, can exchange whatever info it wants...
We will have a DAT Collaborative conference call this Friday August 25, 12:00-1:00pm EDT (9:00am-10:00am PDT). Moderator: Arkady Kanevsky Phone: 888-827-8686 ...
Arkady, Sorry, I could not make the meeting today. Intel votes yes for both IB and IW extensions. Thanks, -arlin ________________________________ From:...
As I am incorporating errata 111 resolution into the spec I have several questions. 1. Is it safe to define DAT_FD to be DAT_INT? Do we really need this or can...
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the dat-discussions group. File :...
dat-discussions@yahoo...
Sep 1, 2006 12:56 am
4041
We will have a DAT Collaborative conference call this Friday Sept 1, 12:00-1:00pm EDT (9:00am-10:00am PDT). Moderator: Arkady Kanevsky Phone: 888-827-8686 ...
Per 9/1 DAT meeting. Here is the proposed model for FD in uDAPL. The CNO FD will be a read FD. When poll or select call return, user can "read" FD which will...
Group, currently all header files includes in the Appendices of the spec includes the follow text: * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND *...
With the addition of FD instead of OS_WAIT_PROXY_AGENT CNO parameters need to change. One way is to just add FD to the list of CNO param. It does not quit...
Hi all, In uDAPL 1.2 header files, there is no definition of DAT_HANDLE_TYPE_SRQ in dat_handle_type structure. So if dat_get_handle_type() is called with a ...
Yogeshwar, not sure which version of the header file you are looking at. The original headers (in 1.2 spec) where missing some defintions. So the updated...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
