Sorry for the slow response, everyone involved in drafting DAPL now have other projects taking first priority. So we don't' jump on questions as quickly as we...
Sorry for the slow response, everyone involved in drafting DAPL now have other projects taking first priority. So we don't' jump on questions as quickly as we...
hello, Can we interpret through the u-DAPL specification , whether completion flag values that are used at the time of posting can be ORed or not. (i.e. can...
Eva
evam@...
Sep 10, 2008 6:20 am
4162
No spec issues. Just use "right" library names in dat.conf file. Thanks, Arkady Kanevsky email: arkady@... Network Appliance Inc....
http://www.datcollaborative.org/implement.html <http://www.datcollaborative.org/implement.html> has been updated. Maintenance and Development Linux and...
My understanding is that the RFC just allows the coexistence of different libraries but the consumers are still responsible of handling the difference between...
Then I do not see any problem with multiple libraries. How do you handle the change of signatures between 1.2 and 2.0 in redirection table? Thanks, Arkady...
I am actually thinking about sticking with one dat.conf. For example, OFED would change to look like the following: # # DAT 1.2 and 2.0 configuration file # #...
I think allowing co-existence is very important. Otherwise, commercial software will not be able to gracefully transition from 1.2 to 2.0 over time. --Bill ...
Magro, Bill
bill.magro@...
Sep 17, 2007 10:24 pm
4153
I am thinking about allowing coexistence of 1.2 and 2.0 libraries for the next release. This will insure that we continue to support 1.2 providers while new...
... I not familiar enough with Windows conventions to give you an answer. Perhaps Arlin or someone on dat-discussions has an opinion. james p.s. In the future,...
I have encountered a problem with the DAT 2.0 header files from OFED 1.2 on SLES 10 when using the GNU C++ compiler. The following "program" compiles as a C...
Jimmy Hill
jimmy.hill@...
Jul 11, 2007 10:01 pm
4147
Yes, I send him a pointer to Arlin's git. Arkady Kanevsky email: arkady@... Network Appliance Inc. phone:...
Hello, I am trying to run dat conformance tests. But I am facing some problems. While running dctest, i am getting segmentation fault. I just want to know...
Arlin, 1 & 3. Why did you get rid of DAT_EXTENSIONS? I thought we agreed that we will support the non-extension version of DAT-2.0 on default. Changing order...
You can ignore the tabs/space changes. Just make sure the other 3 changes are ok. dat.h, udat_config.h and udat.h 1. diff -Naur ./dat/include/dat/dat.h ...
Arlin, Many many thanks for integrating DAT-2.0 in. Great job. Some of the changes looks like just extra tabs and spaces. So there have no impact on the spec. ...
Here is a patch against the published DAT 2.0 headers to align with the OFA build. There are a few changes required for extension support query so please...
A new uDAPL branch based on the new DAT 2.0 specification that is ready for testing on openfabrics.org. This version requires OFED 1.2 verbs and rdmacm...
Ok, having sparked the discussion, I'd better have some answers for some of the more problematic questions - if not immediately, then in the near future. On...
... My hunch is that the receiver without a buffer would have to NACK the packet (if it anticipated that it would soon have a buffer) and drop-out of the group...
Caitlin, I had not looked at this partial multicast case. For Send case, what is the semantic when a buffer is not posted by one of the receivers? A group...
The openib_scm provider was a temporary stop gap while we were waiting for the OpenFabrics rdma_cm interfaces to be developed. This provider is no longer...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
