I agree with Ellen here. If the consumer is not really intended to use the DAT_EP_ADDRESS then it doesn't belong in the API. It will just cause confusion. ...
The current definition of dat_evd_post_se fails to state what the return will be when the event cannot be posted because the queue is full. Unless there is an...
I think we are missing on important requirement, backwards compatability between versions. If an application writes to the version 1.0 uDAPL spec it should...
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the dat-discussions group. File : /uDAPL...
dat-discussions@yahoo...
Apr 2, 2002 5:59 pm
868
No one can argue with the merit of backwards compatibility, but one can question its implementation. Does this mean the consumer and the provider should...
... I just assumed the last one was so obvious that we didn't need to state it. ;-) Seriously, my assumption was that a method once defined would remain valid...
At a minimum minor revisions must be backwards compatible. We will not be willing to recode between each minor revision. I think we also need to make an effort...
... That makes sense to me. My convention has always been that a minor revision implies 100% source code compatibility -- except of course for any code that...
The complete UDAPL 0.6 document has been uploaded to the file section. Well as "complete" as a document can be when the real definition of "0.6" is "everything...
(See attached file: access_api.pdf)(See attached file: ib_access_api.zip) Jerry Rogich IBM Microelectronics Server Business Line Architecture 281 Winter St,...
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the dat-discussions group. File :...
dat-discussions@yahoo...
Apr 4, 2002 9:22 pm
876
This is the kDAPL document that is cleaned up by a tech writer. I had not added technical clarifications suggested after the ratification of kDAPL-0.995. I...
Dear Collaborative, This wednesday our conf. call coinside with the Spring IBTA Solution conference which is attended by many of us. In order to avoid loosing...
Same here. Thank You, Marc V. Shelley Business Relations/Sr. Product Manager Emulex Corp. - IP Storage Networking Group (978) 779-7346 (office) (978) 376-6635...
Here is the list of attendees I have so far for the face to face meeting. If you are not on this list and plan to attend please let me know. Please be sure to...
Dear DAT Collaborative, you are all invited to the discussions on IBTA and RDMA Transport APIs jointly hosted by DAT Collaborative and The Open Group ICSC. ...
Hi Heidi, I will dial-in. Thanks, Som. +--------------------------------+ ... +--------------------------------+ ... meeting. ... Please ... have if...
Due to the timing conflict with joint DAT/ICSC API presentations and IBTA conference we will cancel this week conf. call. For the next week agenda we will...
Caitlin's proposal makes sense to me. In addition, I think for minor revisions that the group needs to be careful about the amount of incompatibility that is...
Perhaps I was getting a little too far ahead in trying to state some sort of bug-fix policy on the last call. As Ellen says there are many shades of gray....
Ladies and Gents, Enclosed, is the current version of the uDAPL reqs. It includes all the agreements reached at the last several conf. calls and cleanup donw...
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the dat-discussions group. File :...
dat-discussions@yahoo...
Apr 9, 2002 1:22 am
892
This is version 0.7 of the uDAPL document. It includes: all kDAPL cleanup, updated requiments, full APIs. Please, check carefully, all the areas of the...