Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
dcproof · DC Proof Users' Group
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1 - 30 of 165   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1
Effective: 2004-02-15 New Beta release with the following updates: 1. Added Alt-key shortcuts for menus 2. Reorganized Logic menu 3. Revised User Manual -...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Feb 16, 2004
10:05 pm
2
One user has written to me to suggest: "A big feature could be to allow any propositional calculus lemma to be used as new axioms. Eg. The tutorial proves...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2004
4:21 pm
3
Effective: 2004-03-03 New Beta release for DC Proof 1.0 with the following updates: 1. Added industry standard Ctrl-key shortcuts for Undo, Redo, Cut, Copy,...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2004
4:22 pm
4
One reader at a math newsgroup suggested: I would suggest to use the COMMON quantifiers (Ax) and (Ex) instead of the extremely uncommon and rather...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2004
5:17 pm
5
Question received by e-mail today: How stable and safe do you think the current version is? My reply: Quite stable. Today's release had only minor changes, as...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2004
4:12 am
6
See the DC Proof 1.0, Beta Test Status Report at http://www.dcproof.com/StatusReport.htm Dan...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2004
2:47 pm
7
I received this question a few days ago: I have a question on DCProof; is there a way to make definitions (for example, define how will a predicate or a...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2004
11:06 pm
8
Effective: 2004-03-07 New Beta release for DC Proof 1.0 with the following updates: 1. Fixed error message in the Premise Rule that pointed to the wrong line...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2004
7:25 pm
9
... one ... This approach isn't convenient for the developments I am intending to use. Let me give you an example: I want to prove (or check out) all the...
Rafael Pe%ffaloza
rpenalozan
Offline Send Email
Mar 11, 2004
5:08 pm
10
... be ... the ... click ... old ... copy ... to ... leave ... intending ... have ... this ... copy ... In this particular case, I do have the defintion of 0...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 11, 2004
5:29 pm
11
Effective: 2004-03-11 New Beta release for DC Proof 1.0 with the following update: 1. Fixed error in Find form that did not properly process special character,...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 12, 2004
5:25 am
12
If you downloaded DC Proof yesterday, you may have the wrong version -- one that still contains a bug in Find form. To ensure you have the correct version,...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 13, 2004
1:43 pm
13
Effective: March 17, 2004 4:30PM EST New beta release including: 1. Change to enable use of Copy and Find functions at any point in processing, the only...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 17, 2004
9:49 pm
14
The definition of 0 was just a simple example. I am dealing right now with Bayesian Networks. I know that DCProof isn't intended for this kind of applications,...
Rafael Pe%ffaloza
rpenalozan
Offline Send Email
Mar 18, 2004
10:13 pm
15
Raphael, Would you please give me an example of a formal defintion that you have found to be problematic. Is it a question of notation? Dan ... now ... kind ...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 18, 2004
11:20 pm
16
... now ... kind ... of ... you, ... [snip] Definitions such as I provide for group theory -- with modifications if desired -- can easily be put in a file,...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 19, 2004
5:26 am
17
Maybe I'm not making myself clear enough. Forget about group theory and 0, and suppose I have a new operator, which is no more than a closed funcion, I want to...
Rafael Pe%ffaloza
rpenalozan
Offline Send Email
Mar 19, 2004
9:40 pm
18
I have a new petition or suggestion on improvement. Suppose I want to prove that a<b => b>a Given your definitions of '<' and '>', there is a point in the...
Rafael Pe%ffaloza
rpenalozan
Offline Send Email
Mar 19, 2004
9:40 pm
19
... different ... absolute ... GIVING ... I understood that the group theoretic 0 was just an example. I mentioned it again only to show that it could be...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 19, 2004
10:12 pm
20
The Set Operations option on the Set menu does not work at all. There may sometimes be a problem parsing the set intersection (&&) and set union (||) operators...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 19, 2004
11:03 pm
21
Effective: March 20, 2004 1:45 AM New beta release including fix of bugs in Set Operations option of Sets menu, and other modules that did not recognize set...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 20, 2004
6:59 am
22
... proof ... Yes. Use the Symmetry option of the Sets menu. Dan Homepage: http://www.dcproof.com...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 20, 2004
7:04 am
23
Substitution should also work: DC Proof 1.0 - Subst Test 1 x=y Premise 2 x=x Substitute, 1, 1 3 y=x Substitute, 1, 2 4 x=y => y=x Conclusion, 1 5 ALL(y):[x=y...
Mark Hurd
markehurd
Offline Send Email
Mar 20, 2004
3:19 pm
24
How can I use XOR or an equivalent function in DCProof? I could not find it. An equivalent can be written as A XOR B = [A | B ] & ~ [ A & B ] One could use...
michaelg_lew
mglewis@...
Send Email
Mar 23, 2004
10:40 pm
25
Mike, You cannot define your own logical operators in DC Proof. You can, however, define symmetric difference -- the set theoretic equivalent of XOR. To get an...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 24, 2004
12:19 am
26
Dan might have a different point of view in this case, but he mostly chooses to implement features corresponding to basic teaching of logic as he observes,...
Mark Hurd
markehurd
Offline Send Email
Mar 24, 2004
4:15 am
27
Currently the Cases rule corresponds to: [P | Q] & [[P => R] & [Q => R]] => R However this can be generalised to: [P | Q] & [[P => R] & [Q => S]] => R | S And...
Mark Hurd
markehurd
Offline Send Email
Mar 24, 2004
4:16 am
28
Here are the promised definitions of symmetric difference (delta) as promised: www.dcproof.com/delta.proof (DC Proof format) www.dcproof.com/delta.html...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 24, 2004
4:24 am
29
I will implement an XOR operator. Any suggestions for notation? I don't want to use "XOR" or "xor" because these are currently interpreted as a proposition and...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 24, 2004
4:58 am
30
... And interesting possibility, but does this really come up that often? I'm sure there are hundreds of PC theorems I could implement. For pedagogical...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 24, 2004
5:18 am
Messages 1 - 30 of 165   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help