Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
dcproof · DC Proof Users' Group
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 136 - 165 of 165   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
136
... Corrected last line of "Field Axioms" (line 1)to include proviso that ~a=0. Thanks to Mark Hurd for pointing this out this error. Dan...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Feb 21, 2006
5:47 am
137
Effective Immediately New Release of DC Proof 1.0 Dated 2006-02-22 Includes: 1. Fixed bug in Subset Rule that would sometimes insert brackets improperly....
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2006
3:34 pm
138
Effective Immediately New Release of DC Proof 1.0 includes: 1. Warning on Premise Rule that lists existential variables (those introduced by Existential...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 6, 2006
10:49 pm
139
Addendum ... mode. ... Also... 6. Reorganized Samples directory. New files include axioms and properties of the real numbers. Dan...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 6, 2006
10:59 pm
140
Effectively Immediately New release of DC Proof 1.0 dated 2006-03-10 includes: 1. In insert mode, after Undoing a change, cursor now properly reset at insert...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 10, 2006
4:25 pm
141
Effective Immediately New Release of DC Proof 1.0 dated 2006-03-20 includes: 1. Added Reset button to Substitution Form. 2. When closing a Premise Block...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Mar 21, 2006
5:09 am
142
Effective Immediately New release of DC Proof 1.0 dated 2006-05-26 Includes: 1. Improved warning message for the Premise Rule indicating any relevant...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
May 26, 2006
8:42 pm
143
Effective Immedidately New Release of DC Proof 1.0 dated 2006-08-14 includes: 1. Minor changes to Tutorial in User Documentation. No changes to functionality. ...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Aug 14, 2006
5:56 pm
144
Hi list, looking at the proof regarding addition of natural numbers, it was stated that the subset rule had been used-- in particular the set s being...
Thomas Heye
thomas_heye
Offline Send Email
Sep 7, 2006
2:25 pm
145
Thomas, Thanks for bringing this to my attention! The proof in question (at the DC Proof website) was written with an old version of DC Proof. Currently,...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Sep 7, 2006
3:05 pm
146
Here is the required proof: http://www.dcproof.com/AddFunctionNEW.proof Dan ... (at ... empty! ... Subset ... was ... set s ... the ... I'm...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Sep 14, 2006
2:49 pm
147
Hi Dan, here's a fragment of a proof. Applying the uspec/espec rule to line 94, I get the warning: "x will depend on: x1, x2, y1, y2." Note that none of these...
Thomas Heye
thomas_heye
Offline Send Email
Sep 14, 2006
8:28 pm
148
Hi Thomas, You will get that message sometimes when you do Existential Specification. It is for informational purposes only to help you understand warnings...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Sep 15, 2006
3:04 am
149
Hi folks, I'd like to prove for all natural numbers a,b that a +a=b+b implies a=b. My ideas so far: Having shown that a<b, a=b, b<a are mutually exclusive, it...
Thomas Heye
thomas_heye
Offline Send Email
Sep 15, 2006
7:09 pm
150
Hi Thomas, Heading in the direction you've suggested: x<y =>x+x<y+x =>x+y<y+y x+y=y+x =>x+x<y+y This requires a<b=>a+c<b+c, a+b=b+a, a<b & b<c => a<c And if...
Mark Hurd
markehurd
Offline Send Email
Sep 16, 2006
4:51 pm
151
Hi list, there's something odd about substitution: Suppose you have r=c+a+b and x=a+b then substituting x in the 1st equation is impossible; whereas it works...
Thomas Heye
thomas_heye
Offline Send Email
Sep 18, 2006
12:40 pm
152
Hi Thomas, The usual order precedence for algebraic operators is built into DC Proof. In this case r=c+a+b is interpreted as r=(c+a)+b, the left- most +...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Sep 18, 2006
1:24 pm
153
Effectively immediately New release of DC Proof 1.0 includes: 1. Change to User Reference Guide. Added note to section on Substitution Rule: "Please note that...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Sep 18, 2006
8:37 pm
154
Hi Dan, I hope these proofs are of interest to you :-). The 'details' of the proof are contained in 6 separate files: - 'addcancelable_short' extends...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Sep 25, 2006
3:30 am
155
Hi, recently I noticed that 'delete all references' also deletes statements even if they don't reference the line being deleted. (How) can I prevent that? I...
Thomas Heye
thomas_heye
Offline Send Email
Oct 8, 2006
8:55 pm
156
... (How) ... thought ... I ... proof ... In addition to all direct references to a selected line of proof, the Delete All References command will also delete...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2006
4:00 am
157
Hi Dan, here's the 'commutativity' proof of the add function-- I'm not quite sure if 'symmetric function' is the correct term for it. Regards, Thomas [Download...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Oct 10, 2006
1:27 pm
158
Hi Dan, here's what I proved so far in constructing the add function. By the way, I think it's remarkable that the function used in the construction is...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Oct 10, 2006
1:29 pm
159
... for ... definition ... Thomas, I like your straightfoward construction of the add function(lines 18 - 27). It is much superior to the one I posted here...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Oct 11, 2006
4:51 am
160
Hi Dan, ... Thanks for the flowers ;-). But in fact it's your construction of Sep. 13. The main reason for removing the condition "(a,b,c) e n3" was to ease...
Thomas Heye
thomas_heye
Offline Send Email
Oct 15, 2006
10:12 pm
161
... (lines ... Sep. ... to ... [snip] My proof of Sep 13 was based on a construction of the set of functions of two variables mapping NxN -> N, and then taking...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Oct 16, 2006
1:45 pm
162
Effective Immediately New Release of DC Proof, dated 2006-10-24 Includes: 1. Fixed bug in Universal Generalization module that would, on rare occasions, result...
Dan Christensen
dchris1953
Offline Send Email
Oct 24, 2006
8:06 pm
163
Dear members, I have been working on possible enhancements to DC Proof that I hope will make it easier to create recursive definitions of sets and functions....
dcproof1
Offline Send Email
Apr 30, 2007
2:32 am
164
Dear members, I have included three new, very brief proofs illustrating a set theoretic interpretation of the classical syllogism in the latest version of the...
dcproof1
Offline Send Email
Sep 29, 2007
5:39 am
165
(I have tried to send this twice already without apparent success. Apologizing in advance for any duplication.) Below are the correct URL's for the proofs...
Dan Christensen
dcproof1
Offline Send Email
Sep 29, 2007
6:13 pm
Messages 136 - 165 of 165   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help