A few days before the purported "ET Response to 1974 SETI transmission"
crop formation appeared a week ago
http://www.eionews.addr.com/psyops/chilbolton_reply.htm ,
the grand-daddy of all crop circles appeared also in England,

"in about 4 acres of crop. This formation has taken everyone's breath away
and is without a shadow of a doubt, the greatest formation since the crop
circles began! It is the mother of all crop circles, and covers an area of
nearly 700,000 square feet!"

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2001/MilkHill2/milkhill2001a.html

Of course, anyone can understand that some, if not many, crop circles are
fake, but...

To say that ALL crop circles are hoaxes is about as substantiatable as
saying ALL UFO sightings and experiences are hoaxes. In this mega-glyph
Milk Hill case, aside from the complex design, how could such a large --
huge! -- formation be done in the dark, overnight in one night (by how many
"hoaxers"?), let alone without leaving footprints or signs of human
construction.

Hank is whistling dixie on this one! He says "Jack, I am sure its a hoax"
but does not acknowledge/mention even looking at the website. Jack's
"advisory staff" depth?

Jack Sarfatti is excused here because theoretical physicists are usually
neither trained nor qualified to "believe" what they see with their own eyes
:-) --- even if they are able to look without fear of "being wrong" or
that what they see CBTBIVTLOP (Can't Be True Because It Violates The Laws Of
Physics :-)

At least Jack read the evaluation of the "SETI response" formation but
rather than coming to his own conclusions about the raw data itself, he
froths at the obviously lacking interpretations of it in that article and
cries that it CBTBIVTLOP :-)

DCW




"Dr. Jack Sarfatti" <sarfatti@...> wrote in message
news:3B87B7F0.83EB946D@....
> Thanks Hank :-)
>
> Hankskids@... wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 8/24/01 7:50:12 PM, sarfatti@... writes:
> >
> > Jack asks: << I do not have time to read this right now. Is it authentic
or
> > more macroshift?

[above Jack refers to story and images at
http://www.eionews.addr.com/psyops/chilbolton_reply.htm ]

> >
> > >>
> >
> > Jack, I am sure its a hoax. The first crop circles were begun in Bath in
the
> > 1970s. They were, at that time artifacts of an art form known as Earth
Art,
> > with several practicioners, Several examples of mazes and labyrinths
started
> > it out. A wroter and Guru type editor for Thames and Hudson, Initials
JM,
> > with a vast following, took a fancy to pre-Raphaelite paintings, Millet,
etc.
> > Specifically the Gleaners. In the Gleaners one can see haystacks piled
up and
> > peasants cutting straw, etc. Van Gough carried this through even unto
his
> > very last painting and now, this new art form, which, like all good art
> > should be mysterious, Mona Lisa's smile, etc. How do they do it? I do
not
> > know for sure but it all stems from a very small tight knit group who
are
> > trying to send UFO patterns to other humans. It was explained to me once
> > while I was living in Glastonbury. The center of this activity is the
city of
> > Bath. It's a field day for the macroshifters. 10 to 12 per night in
England
> > at one point. Now fewer circles occur, but they are more elaborate. Its
done
> > with templates and steam and special seeds planted the year prior. hh
>
> --
> CREATE, COMMUNICATE, COLLABORATE
> http://stardrive.org
>
>