Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
dead_wood · Dead Wood Ecology & Mgmt Discussion
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
What do we mean by CWD?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #242 of 347 |
Dear deadwoodologists

I'm sometimes asked by colleagues what exactly I mean by coarse woody debris,
especially by people looking to pick holes in estimates of CWD volumes. I have
to explain that what I mean by CWD may not correspond with what others mean, and
hence our figures are not always entirely comparable. With all the upsurge of
interest in dead wood (e.g. for carbon accounting and for biodiversity), isn't
it about time we standardised on our definitions? I appreciate that we all put
the data to different uses, but are our uses so different that we can't
standardise?

Maybe this is old news, and standards may have been developed and adopted. But
if so, what are they, and where are they laid down? Two key discrepancies come
to mind: whether or not CWD includes standing dead wood; and what is the minimum
diameter below which CWD becomes fine woody debris? Some people use 7.5 cm,
others 10 cm, others 15 cm; others use inches which almost (but don't quite)
correspond to these cm definitions. Likewise ha or acres. Personally, I have
tended to exclude standing dead wood and have specified a minimum diameter of
7.5 cm. However, the lower the minimum diameter, the more work involved in
working out volumes per unit area, and the law of diminishing returns applies
since smaller diameter material generally contributes little to overall volumes.

If readers feel that we still lack standards and that it would be worth
developing some, I'd be pleased to see some discussion through this list. If
support was strong enough, we could perhaps consider setting up a web-page that
allows people to vote on alternatives, and could invite members of related lists
(e.g. forestry, carbon accounting, bryology, entomology, mycology) to vote too.

Any comments?

Simon Grove


`'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,

Dr Simon J Grove, Biology and Conservation Branch,
Division of Forest Research and Development
Forestry Tasmania, GPO Box 207, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Tel. 61 3 6233 8141. Fax 61 3 6233 8292.
Email: simon.grove@....
Web address: http://forestrytas.com.au/



This transmission is intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it
is addressed.
It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information.
If you have received this transmission in error, you may not use, copy or
distribute it.
Please advise us by return e-mail or by phoning 61 3 62338117 and immediately
delete the transmission in its entirety.
We will meet your reasonable expenses of notifying us.
Despite our use of anti-virus software, Forestry Tasmania cannot guarantee that
this transmission is virus-free.




Tue May 28, 2002 3:51 am

taroona25
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #242 of 347 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Dear deadwoodologists I'm sometimes asked by colleagues what exactly I mean by coarse woody debris, especially by people looking to pick holes in estimates of...
Simon Grove
taroona25
Offline Send Email
May 28, 2002
4:00 am

Simon, I agree, it would be great to have standards. There are some in British Columbia, Canada, I believe. I'll try to dig them up - or maybe someone over...
Daniel Koechli
dkochli
Offline Send Email
May 28, 2002
6:25 am

To answer Daniel Koechli - in British Columbia CWD is defined as being > 7.5 cm in diameter and as we measure to the nearest 0.1 cm, a piece has to be 7.6 cm...
Parminter, John V FOR...
john.parminter@...
Send Email
May 29, 2002
12:25 am

There are 2 issues associated with a minimum standard. One is what we measure and one is how we report it. If we all measure the same then there is no problem...
Stone, Jeff N FOR:EX
jeffnstone
Offline Send Email
May 30, 2002
3:50 pm

Most interesting, John! I had no idea that fire was the reason to start CWD inventories. Is that the reason why CWD includes generally only downed (& more or...
Daniel Koechli
dkochli
Offline Send Email
May 31, 2002
8:57 am

Fire behaviour researchers were measuring "woody fuel" before it became more generally known as Coarse Woody Debris. The fact that we still call it "debris"...
Parminter, John V FOR...
john.parminter@...
Send Email
Jun 3, 2002
6:28 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help