Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
dead_wood · Dead Wood Ecology & Mgmt Discussion
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
What do we mean by CWD?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #246 of 347 |
RE: [dead_wood] What do we mean by CWD?

There are 2 issues associated with a minimum standard. One is what we
measure and one is how we report it.

If we all measure the same then there is no problem understanding what each
of reports. However, we measure for different objectives, with different
budgets, and with different organizational histories. Thus, it is important
that how we measured is properly identified. This is usually well documented
in the methodology of a publication. However, the results are reported
separately from the methodology and in comparisons between different
studies/inventories the specifics in the methods may be overlooked. As such
as a standard practice, I suggest that we always include the minimum
diameter limit in the unit e.g., 200 cubic metres (>7.5 cm dia.) when we
report area based total dead wood volume. And if our measurements enable, we
should report at other minimum diameters to enable comparison for others.


Cheers

Jeff

Jeff Stone
Timber Supply Analyst
Kamloops Forest Region, Ministry of Forests
515 Columbia Street
Kamloops, British Columbia V2C 2T7 Canada

Telephone: 250-828-4171  Fax: 250-828-4154 
Email: jeff.stone@...

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Grove [mailto:simon.grove@...]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 8:52 PM
To: dead_wood@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [dead_wood] What do we mean by CWD?


Dear deadwoodologists

I'm sometimes asked by colleagues what exactly I mean by coarse woody
debris, especially by people looking to pick holes in estimates of CWD
volumes. I have to explain that what I mean by CWD may not correspond with
what others mean, and hence our figures are not always entirely comparable.
With all the upsurge of interest in dead wood (e.g. for carbon accounting
and for biodiversity), isn't it about time we standardised on our
definitions? I appreciate that we all put the data to different uses, but
are our uses so different that we can't standardise?

Maybe this is old news, and standards may have been developed and adopted.
But if so, what are they, and where are they laid down? Two key
discrepancies come to mind: whether or not CWD includes standing dead wood;
and what is the minimum diameter below which CWD becomes fine woody debris?
Some people use 7.5 cm, others 10 cm, others 15 cm; others use inches which
almost (but don't quite) correspond to these cm definitions. Likewise ha or
acres. Personally, I have tended to exclude standing dead wood and have
specified a minimum diameter of 7.5 cm. However, the lower the minimum
diameter, the more work involved in working out volumes per unit area, and
the law of diminishing returns applies since smaller diameter material
generally contributes little to overall volumes.

If readers feel that we still lack standards and that it would be worth
developing some, I'd be pleased to see some discussion through this list.
If support was strong enough, we could perhaps consider setting up a
web-page that allows people to vote on alternatives, and could invite
members of related lists (e.g. forestry, carbon accounting, bryology,
entomology, mycology) to vote too.

Any comments?

Simon Grove


`'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,

Dr Simon J Grove, Biology and Conservation Branch,
Division of Forest Research and Development
Forestry Tasmania, GPO Box 207, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Tel. 61 3 6233 8141. Fax 61 3 6233 8292.
Email: simon.grove@....
Web address: http://forestrytas.com.au/



This transmission is intended solely for the person or organisation to whom
it is addressed.
It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information.
If you have received this transmission in error, you may not use, copy or
distribute it.
Please advise us by return e-mail or by phoning 61 3 62338117 and
immediately delete the transmission in its entirety.
We will meet your reasonable expenses of notifying us.
Despite our use of anti-virus software, Forestry Tasmania cannot guarantee
that this transmission is virus-free.



Information about the Dead Wood Ecology and Management Discussion List can
be found at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dead_wood. From this web site you
can post messages, subscribe/unsubscribe, change how you receive posted
messages, view archived messages, see who are the members, and view and post
to a calendar of events, a listing of dead wood web site links, and a
listing of recent literature.

Post message: dead_wood@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: dead_wood-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: dead_wood-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: dead_wood-owner@yahoogroups.com




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Thu May 30, 2002 3:50 pm

jeffnstone
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #246 of 347 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Dear deadwoodologists I'm sometimes asked by colleagues what exactly I mean by coarse woody debris, especially by people looking to pick holes in estimates of...
Simon Grove
taroona25
Offline Send Email
May 28, 2002
4:00 am

Simon, I agree, it would be great to have standards. There are some in British Columbia, Canada, I believe. I'll try to dig them up - or maybe someone over...
Daniel Koechli
dkochli
Online Now Send Email
May 28, 2002
6:25 am

To answer Daniel Koechli - in British Columbia CWD is defined as being > 7.5 cm in diameter and as we measure to the nearest 0.1 cm, a piece has to be 7.6 cm...
Parminter, John V FOR...
john.parminter@...
Send Email
May 29, 2002
12:25 am

There are 2 issues associated with a minimum standard. One is what we measure and one is how we report it. If we all measure the same then there is no problem...
Stone, Jeff N FOR:EX
jeffnstone
Offline Send Email
May 30, 2002
3:50 pm

Most interesting, John! I had no idea that fire was the reason to start CWD inventories. Is that the reason why CWD includes generally only downed (& more or...
Daniel Koechli
dkochli
Online Now Send Email
May 31, 2002
8:57 am

Fire behaviour researchers were measuring "woody fuel" before it became more generally known as Coarse Woody Debris. The fact that we still call it "debris"...
Parminter, John V FOR...
john.parminter@...
Send Email
Jun 3, 2002
6:28 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help