Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
dead_wood · Dead Wood Ecology & Mgmt Discussion
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Information on impacts of fuelwood harvesting   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #300 of 347 |
Dear colleagues

In Tasmania's native wet eucalypt production forests, there are
currently proposals to increase the harvest volumes ('reduce the
wastage') by harvesting a proportion of what used to be called 'residue'
but which ecologists call coarse woody debris. The aim is to use this
in a wood-fired power station which would feed into the electricity
grid.

Our concerns about this practice will be obvious to members of this
discussion group, but justifying our concerns to those with a more
'utilitarian' vision of forests is proving difficult. What I would like
to know is, are you aware of any research that has looked at this issue
from an ecological perspective in other parts of the world? And if so,
how has it been resolved, or hasn't it?

Our forests have huge natural volumes of CWD, which is why harvesting
some of it is so appealing to the 'utilitarians'. But my feeling is
that the biodiversity associated with CWD here will have evolved
alongside these large volumes, so we can't say that it's OK to take most
of it because there will still be plenty left. Because of the naturally
high volumes of CWD, many of our species are likely to have very low
powers of dispersal, which is why we have proposed prescriptions that
retain CWD on every forestry coupe. The 'utilitarians' would rather
rely on the formal and informal reserve system to ensure the survival of
CWD dependent biodiversity across our forestry landscape: it would make
forestry (and fuelwood harvesting) much simpler.

If you have any views on this that can help us frame ideas for maximum
effect, please let me know.

Thanks

Simon Grove





`'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,

Dr Simon J Grove, Conservation Biologist,
Biology and Conservation Branch,
Division of Forest Research and Development
Forestry Tasmania, GPO Box 207, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Tel. 61 3 6233 8141. Fax 61 3 6233 8292.
Email: simon.grove@....
Web addresses: http://www.forestrytas.com.au/
http://www.warra.com

This transmission is intended solely for the person
or organisation to whom it is addressed.
It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information.
If you have received this transmission in error,
you may not use, copy or distribute it.
Please advise us by return e-mail or by phoning 61 3 62338203
and immediately delete the transmission in its entirety.
We will meet your reasonable expenses of notifying us.
Despite our use of anti-virus software, Forestry Tasmania cannot guarantee
that this transmission is virus-free.




Thu Oct 14, 2004 11:57 pm

taroona25
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #300 of 347 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Dear colleagues In Tasmania's native wet eucalypt production forests, there are currently proposals to increase the harvest volumes ('reduce the wastage') by...
Simon Grove
taroona25
Offline Send Email
Oct 14, 2004
11:57 pm

Dear People involved with trees. Web Site on Logging and TREE BIOLOGY http://www.chesco.com/~treeman/sound Why do people spend a fortune on tree treatments...
John A. Keslick, Jr.
treeman@...
Send Email
Oct 15, 2004
10:35 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help